Skip to content

Sussex Police Arrest Two Over Dignitas Claims

August 18, 2013

A man and a woman have been arrested over claims they could be planning to take a vulnerable pensioner to end his life at Switzerland’s Dignitas centre.

They have been questioned on suspicion of encouraging or assisting a suicide.

Officers have asked for an assessment of the “vulnerable” 71-year-old man’s mental capacity to determine how able he is to make his own decisions.

Sussex Police said the man, 25 and the woman, 65, both from the Chichester area, had been bailed until October.

The force said officers would be carrying out further inquiries.

‘Scrutiny of motives’

In a statement, a police spokesman said: “Police have been made aware of suggestions that a man and a woman from West Sussex could be planning to take a vulnerable pensioner to the Dignitas clinic in Switzerland so that he can end his life.”

He said it was an offence to encourage or assist suicide under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009.

  Fresh guidelines were made after a case brought by Debbie Purdy

Officers were investigating whether any crime had been committed or was likely to be committed if they did not take action, he added.

In 2010, Director of Public Prosecutions Keir Starmer QC clarified the legal position on assisted suicide.

Fresh guidelines placed closer scrutiny on suspects’ motives, and whether they had acted “wholly compassionately” and not for financial reasons.

However, Mr Starmer made it clear the advice did not represent a change in the law and did not cover so-called mercy killings.

The 2010 guidelines were the result of a case brought by Debbie Purdy, a terminally ill woman, who in 2009 won a ruling from the Law Lords requiring the director of public prosecutions to set out whether her husband would be committing an offence if he accompanied her to Dignitas to end her life.

In 2012, MPs backed the guidelines.

‘Suicide tourism’

Assisting suicide remains a criminal offence in England Wales, punishable by up to 14 years in prison, but individual circumstances in each case are now more likely to be taken into account.

  In 2011 Zurich voters rejected a ban on foreigners travelling to Switzerland to die

Over the past 14 years, Dignitas has helped more than 1,000 people to die with about 150 Britons choosing to die at its facility in Zurich.

In Switzerland, assisted suicide is legal as long as the helper does not personally benefit from the death.

The Swiss government has tried to reduce what has been referred to as “suicide tourism”.

But the majority of voters in Zurich have backed assisted dying and also the practice of foreigners travelling to the country to end their lives.

In a poll in May 2011, about 85% of voters in Zurich rejected a call to end legalised assisted suicide, and 78% rejected a call to ban foreigners from travelling to Switzerland to end their life.

One Comment leave one →
  1. Nick's avatar
    Nick permalink
    August 18, 2013 5:26 pm

    This topic is a bit of a blow for IDS and David Cameron i would have thought as their policy is to make life hell for the sick and disabled and any deaths to be good thing to keep the welfare bill down

    the law states that anyone encouraging or assisting a suicide will receive a prison sentence ?

    The DWP fall just short of encouraging or assisting a suicide however by stopping a persons benefit and leaving them to starve to death or to commit suicide by the situation
    that they find themselves is ok ?

    personally i would say you were guilty encouraging or assisting a suicide and that by stopping a persons benefit by saying they were fit for work but weren’t and they committed suicide the DWP would have a case to answer ?

    IE you put undue pressure on a ill or disabled person who had died and by knowingly you could foresee the outcome and thereby you are guilty of this persons death by encouraging or assisting a suicide

    maybe someone here who has a better standing of English and in the ways the law stands and the use of the words encouraging or assisting and it’s in interpretation of the law regarding encouraging or assisting a suicide

    well whatever by the many deaths the DWP have caused i would say who needs to go to Switzerland when you can stay here and die on their watch or am i reading this in the wrong context ?

    Like

What are you thinking?