Skip to content

An Open Letter To Michael Gove

May 9, 2014

I’ve just come across this on Facebook. I know and love several teachers, which is why I am sharing it.

This is first and foremost shared as a tribute to Gareth Utting and to all special teachers who make a difference.

But, this being a disability blog, I feel I must explain the very small disability link in this post.

That is that I know there are disabled teachers in England. The NUT has a special group and seat for them. There must also be many teachers who are parent or family carers of disabled children.

I have to wonder- how many of them are facing this level of pressure? We haven’t heard their stories, but through sharing this letter, hopefully we can stop them having stories like this one to tell.

29th April 2014

Dear Mr Gove,

I am writing to inform you of the death of Mr Gareth Utting, a teacher of English at a secondary school in Shropshire.

Gareth died at the age of 37 of a massive heart attack. There were a few contributory factors to his death, but looming large was the word ‘stress’. He leaves me a widow with three children, aged fourteen, four and one.

This is not the angry rant of a bereaved person. I haven’t got anywhere near angry yet. I am still reeling with shock and wondering if there was anything I could have done to prevent my husband’s death. When these thoughts beset me, I keep coming back to the fact that I should have done more to help him get out of teaching. And how can that be right, to think that? I love teaching. In the few weeks since Gareth died, I have heard and read so many tributes from his students that attest to the positive impact that a good teacher can make. I should be proud that my husband was a teacher. But right at this moment, I’m not. I’m sorry that he was. Because if he had a different job, he might still be with us.

I don’t pretend to know the ins and outs of the changes that have hit teachers in the last few years. I qualified as a teacher myself but have been at home raising our young children, so have not been directly involved. But I can tell you what I see around me.

Teachers like Gareth have changed.

Their hopes for the young people in their care have not changed. Neither has their willingness to go the extra mile to help those young people to succeed. But the work-load that they struggle under and the pressures that are applied to them from above have greatly increased. If this led to better education for our children, then I would be supporting these changes. But I don’t see better education. I see good teachers breaking under the load. I see good teachers embittered and weary. I see good teachers leaving the profession. I see good teachers never even entering the profession, for fear of what lies ahead. I see pupils indoctrinated with achievement targets, who are afraid to veer from the curriculum in case it affects their next assessment; pupils for whom ‘knowledge’ is defined by a pass mark and their position within a cohort.

Within this atmosphere, my husband struggled to help his pupils in every way he could. The comments that they have left on social media reflect a teacher-pupil relationship that was honest, helpful and mutually respectful. He taught them English, and they did well at it. But he also taught them about life, and love, and self-esteem. But he did this in spite of, not because of, the current state of the education system.

Gareth is at peace now. But I have some difficult choices to make.

Do I return to a profession that takes so high a toll? When my four-year-old son says he wants to be a teacher, do I smile or try to talk him out of it? When I see Gareth’s colleagues, do I congratulate them for being so amazing, or encourage them to explore other career options?

Mr Gove, I don’t envy you your job. I don’t know the best way to achieve a high standard of education for all pupils, everywhere. But I do know this: People don’t become teachers to be slackers, for the pension or for the name badge.

Here’s an interesting theory of mine that I was discussing recently with my husband. If you took away all external inspection and supervision, all targets and reviews, if teachers were left to themselves to teach what they wanted to teach, the way they wanted to teach it, what do you think would happen?

This is what I think: Every teacher that I know cares deeply about their subject and their students. They would teach marvellously. They would share knowledge and encourage each other. They would deal with problems (including less-than-perfect pupils and teachers) with the professionalism that they possess in spades.

Of course we cannot remove all monitoring of teachers and schools. But it seems to me that you have forgotten this basic fact: Teachers love to teach, and they want to do it well.

I don’t know what I want to ask of you. All I know is that the situation as it stands is wrong. On behalf of all the teachers and pupils out there, I beg you to go back to the drawing-board. Learn from your mistakes. Gain knowledge.

And please don’t send me your condolences.

Yours,
Alison Utting.

PLEASE LIKE AND SHARE IF YOU LOVE A TEACHER. Maybe we can get them to listen.

 

 

3 Comments leave one →
  1. sdbast's avatar
    sdbast permalink
    May 9, 2014 8:15 am

    Reblogged this on sdbast.

    Like

  2. joshuachristian19691's avatar
    joshuachristian19691 permalink
    May 9, 2014 1:50 pm

    Reblogged this on THE SIEGE OF BRITAIN and commented:
    There are two kinds of teachers – those that are born and those that are made. This one was born to be a teacher. Each teacher in this this country is worth ten Michael Gove’s and more. Such a tragic loss.

    Like

  3. Shaun's avatar
    Shaun permalink
    May 11, 2014 12:08 am

    This policy, and the structure that places so much power in a single person, is wrong at so many levels it is difficult to know where to start. There is the structure that enables a single person to implement a policy, without regard to the advice offered by independent professional; as opposed to advice proffered by representatives from large corporations with large wallets, that will all but define the lives of millions of children through to adult-hood. This continuous training that will commence at the age five, and for a working day that gets longer by the year, will have a devastating impact on ‘our’ children, society, democratic system (it can only be as good as the electorate’s ability to choose the merits of the respective candidates) and this nation’s capacity to create wealth above that of its competitors – training people to become passive non-thinkers who except orders without question is a skill mastered by military organisations, say, at least 100 hundred years ago; whereas, encouraging people to think creatively and with imagination is much more difficult and as such is a scarce resource, which would give the nation whose population had it a great advantage over its rivals. This does not touch upon the devastating consequences of this system on all those children denied who will be denied the opportunity of ‘living the examined life’ or to choose not to. That is a crime beyond measure- and one that will not be apparent for most of those so robbed. This is why it is for us to prevent this, for we had an education, to a considerable extent one bought by our grandparents at the end of the Second World War, that to varying degrees brought out our ability to think critically and without too many ‘trained in’ assumptions that limit and control our thought processes. Yes, with time, this is the most important issue for us and our society.

    Like

What are you thinking?