Skip to content

Former Jobcentre Official “Jobcentres Bully Claimants Off The Register”

January 21, 2015

From yesterday’s Guardian:

Jobcentre bosses set up “hit squads” to target benefit claimants for sanctions and put pressure on them to sign off the dole, according to evidence presented to an inquiry by MPs.

The written statement, by a former jobcentre official, John Longden, says frontline staff were ordered to “agitate and inconvenience” customers so they fell foul of the rules, enabling staff to stop their benefits payments.

Staff who failed to meet sanctions targets each month were threatened with disciplinary action, he claims.

Longden says he was told by a manager that the message with regard to customers was: “Let’s set them up from day one.”

He adds: “Customers were being deliberately treated inappropriately in order to achieve [staff] performance [targets] without regard for natural justice and their welfare.”

Longden’s evidence covers events he says he witnessed at Salford and Rochdale jobcentres between 2011 and 2013. It has been lodged with the Commons work and pensions select committee, which is investigating benefit sanctions policy.

A sanction involves the stopping of claimants’ benefit payments for at least four weeks – equivalent to almost £300 – as a penalty for breach of benefit rules and conditions, typically failure to look for work or attend jobcentre appointments.

Ministers introduced tighter rules for claiming benefits in October 2012, saying sanctions were a “last resort” that would encourage claimants to “engage” with jobcentres. However, critics say jobcentres are increasingly neglecting to help claimants find jobs and are instead focusing on finding ways to impose financial penalties on them.

In further written evidence to the committee, another former Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) official accuses jobcentres of “bullying people off the [unemployment] register”.

Ian Wright, a former personal adviser at a Leicester jobcentre, says he was ordered by managers to send more claimants for sanction, and was threatened with disciplinary action when he questioned the policy.

Unscrupulous staff would target weak and vulnerable claimants for sanctions, he states. In one case a customer who could neither read nor write was formally directed to put their CV on a job match website. “Unsurprisingly they did not manage this task and were sanctioned.”

The PCS union, which represents jobcentre staff, said the evidence chimed with its own straw poll of members, which found almost two-thirds had experienced pressure to refer claimants for a sanction inappropriately, while more than a third had been placed on a formal performance improvement plan for not making enough referrals.

PCS is one of a number of witnesses giving evidence to the committee on Wednesday morning.

Longden claims that staff used several tricks to set up claimants. On several occasions jobcentre advisers purposefully booked job appointments without informing the claimant, ensuring they could be sanctioned when they failed to attend.

Claimants would be set unreasonable job search targets, referred for jobs for which they were clearly unsuited, or ordered to sign on every day in the hope they would fail in a task, miss an appointment or be late.

“The aim was to find an opportunity to make a referral to the decision maker [an official who decides whether to sanction a claimant] with the possibility of getting the customer sanctioned.

“It was distressing to see so many customers treated in such a way,” states Longden.

“One customer was made to attend daily for two months and eventually broke down and wept in the office.”

He adds: “Staff were threatened by the cluster manager that their jobs would be taken by other people if they didn’t do what they were told.”

Longden says he raised objections with his line manager more than once after witnessing staff take inappropriate action, but no action was taken.

He says staff “were being asked to behave in a manner that was against the [DWP’s] values of integrity and honesty”. The confrontational approach caused arguments with customers and sometimes police would have to be called to restore order.

Longden, who says he spent 23 years as a jobcentre adviser, states: “Sanctions of customers were encouraged by managers daily, with staff being told to look at every engagement with the customer as an opportunity to take sanction action.

“I was personally told by a manager to ‘agitate’ and ‘inconvenience’ customers in order to get them to leave the register.”

A DWP spokesman said: “Mr Longden’s allegations were thoroughly investigated and no evidence was found to substantiate them. Furthermore, the people named in the allegations strongly refute them.

“The reality is, sanctions are a necessary part of the benefits system but they are used as a last resort in a tiny minority of cases where people don’t play by the rules. Jobcentre Plus advisers work hard every day to help people into work. There are no targets for sanctions.”


6 Comments leave one →
  1. January 21, 2015 9:03 am

    Reblogged this on sdbast.

  2. January 21, 2015 9:22 am

    IDS presides over a system whose sole purpose is to cut or remove benefits from the disabled & unemployed. The Government has also spewed out vile propaganda in the hope of turning those in work against those out of work. It has even stigmatised disabled people which has lead to increased verbal & sometimes physical abuse.

  3. jray permalink
    January 21, 2015 9:30 am

    A “Tiny Minority” FFS,if over One Million Sanctions are a “Tiny Minority” IDS must be doing the math.

  4. January 21, 2015 10:41 am

    The Greens 2015 manifesto holds the Citizen Income that would replace all the huge billions in cost of unemployment benefit admin.

    But The Greens will not commit on paper to its immediate implementation upon election after May.


    Because in their policy website The Greens say the Full Citizen State Pension would be…

    ‘implemented immediately’ …

    The full citizen state pension policy itself does not say paid out in 2015 nor in 2016, nor the age of those receiving the state pension.

    People cannot wait for either Citizien Income
    nor the Full Citizen STate Pension, as
    women could NIL STATE PENSION FOR LIFE from 2016
    older than the women who have already lost state pension at 60 since 2013
    (retirement 2019-2020 onwards)
    and the men denied state pension at 65 from 2013, raised to 66
    also facing no food and fuel money for life or
    the men and women getting flat rate state pension forecasts
    for retiring in 2016
    at only £55 per week
    despite decades paying National Insurance in work.

    See why under my petition
    in my Why this is importantsection at:

  5. January 21, 2015 11:29 am

    Reblogged this on BertieS.

  6. rainbowwarriorlizzie permalink
    January 21, 2015 4:27 pm


What are you thinking?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: