Skip to content


June 8, 2017


Toxic Atos are again having to rebrand claiming

Following an independent review of the PIP assessment journey claimants experience in December 2014, Paul Gray recommended a number of changes to claimant communications to the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and Assessment Providers.
After consultation with DWP and reviewing our communications, we have introduced a new business name that better represents the work we do independently assessing PIP cases.
We believe Independent Assessment Services does this because: • It makes it clear that we are ‘independent’ providers, distinct from DWP • ‘Assessment’ explains the service we deliver assessing PIP cases more clearly than ‘healthcare’ does

It can rebrand as much as it likes, it  doesn’t stop the DWP destroying disabled people’s lives when being assessed and losing their money,  vehicles, jobs when they fail to be assessed correctly and leaving some so distraught their health actually deteriorates or they lose…

View original post 466 more words

4 Comments leave one →
  1. June 8, 2017 11:26 am

    >”Independent Assessment Services”

    I ASs

    So that’s where they can stick it.

    All the ex-Atos abusing murdering criminals now at Maximus have always called themselves ‘CHDA’. But everyone still calls the sub-human filth ‘Maximus’.

    >”It makes it clear that we are ‘independent’ providers, distinct from DWP ”
    ‘Just following orders’ = Nuremberg defense.
    Just means that the swine have been abetted or encouraged and/or bribed to commit their crimes.

    Accessories and Abettors Act 1861 –

    Serious Crime Act 2007 – Part 2 – Encouraging or Assisting Crime –

    The Bribery Act 2010 –

    >”‘Assessment’ explains the service we deliver assessing PIP
    >cases more clearly than ‘healthcare’ does”
    So are Atos criminals going to stop calling their murdering abusing unqualified quack fraudsters “healthcare professionals”? (too late)

    Fraud Act 2006 – Fraud by false representation –

    Medical Act 1983 –
    Penalty for pretending to hold a licence to practise –

    Misconduct in Public Office –

    Criminal Attempts Act 1981 –

    Homicide: Murder and Manslaughter –

  2. June 8, 2017 1:18 pm

    Does this mean they are JUDGE, JURY and posibly EXECUCTIONER on the role of who recieves the benefits? 2014 the nurse had the door open but at the end shut it to say I would get an award.

  3. jeffrey davies permalink
    June 12, 2017 2:35 pm

    action t4 rolling along

  4. Ryan permalink
    October 4, 2017 8:07 pm

    The ATOS brand has become toxic because of the harsh way that ATOS Healthcare operates and this name change is just ATOS’ way of trying to distance themselves from their nasty Independent Assessment Services subsidiary.

What are you thinking?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: