Skip to content
Advertisements

Work And Pensions Committee To Question ATOS, Maximus And Capita On ‘Gruelling’ Medical Assessments

December 4, 2017

 A press release:

This week on Wednesday 6 December at 0930 the Committee will question DWP contractors Atos, Capita and Maximus, who carry out the medical assessments for disability benefits PIP and ESA, putting the disturbing evidence it has heard so far to them. The Committee is also publishing the contractors’ written evidence ahead of their oral testimony.

The unprecedented public response to the Committee’s inquiry has included thousands of individual accounts of medical assessments that range from frustrating to gruelling, and oral testimony from claimants and advocacy groups in the first evidence session strongly reinforced that picture.  Many claimants of ESA and PIP in particular challenge the DWP benefit decision based on these medical assessments, first through “Mandatory Reconsideration”, and then a final appeal stage at a tribunal. However, in May of this year an FOI request revealed that DWP sets a target for 80% of Mandatory Reconsiderations to uphold the original decision. The Committee today publishes a letter to DWP asking how such a target is compatible with a fair and impartial reconsideration process. High proportions of DWP decisions for both benefits are overturned at the tribunal appeal stage, sometimes with a radically different award being decided.

The Committee previously published evidence from the Public and Commercial Services Union, representing the DWP staff who use the medical assessments to make benefits decisions. In that evidence PCS says “our members report that there are regular examples where

the level of expertise of the person carrying out the assessment does not appear to match the requirements of the health condition being assessed…” and that “we do not believe that there is any real quality control. Previous contracts have only been terminated when failings reached extreme levels.”

DWP has today released statistics on the proportion of medical assessments that are deemed “unacceptable” when they are sent to the Department by contractors Atos (IAS on the chart below) and Capita. The charts appear to show remarkably high, if slowly improving, levels of unacceptable reports, in Capita’s case at least with extraordinary fluctuations. Key points:

–          Neither contractor has, at any point in the PIP contract, met the performance target of 3% of reports deemed “unacceptable”.

–          Capita’s own auditing found that at points in the contract almost 60% of its reports were “unacceptable”.

Advertisements
5 Comments leave one →
  1. Liz Douglas permalink
    December 4, 2017 2:47 pm

    Here’s some info that you’d not usually come across Lord Freud on the Universal Credit IT systems. I wish someone other than me would listen to what they’re saying it’s entirely germane to the issues and the reason Universal Credit IT systems aren’t working

    ‘I think what I didn’t know how bad a mistake it had been for all of government sent out their IT’ ‘It was a fundamental mistake for government and the governments of the Western world.’ ‘The civil service thought it had the capacity through commissioning the firms to do it and gov as a whole didn’t see what a problem that was’ ‘People have found it very difficult to work out the problems’ – Civil service has a two year turnover of staff as it is the only way they can get wage increases’ Sharon Right ‘No one had ever experienced a shock economic before so there was no collective knowledge to draw on’ NAO said ‘Universal Credit had been beset by Weak management, Ineffective control and Weak governance’
    ‘There’s an odd structure which I don’t believe in anymore -http://www.parliamentlive.tv/Event/Index/6911af5e-eb1c-478e-b3fb-d26b28ab5997

  2. jeffrey davies permalink
    December 4, 2017 6:16 pm

    action t4 rolling along the house of ill repute has more talks on atos crapita maximus oh dear haven’t we been here before more to die more to suffer while they talk about jeff3

  3. December 4, 2017 9:34 pm

    Reblogged this on sdbast.

Trackbacks

  1. Thousands of disability benefit [PIP] tests branded ‘unacceptable’ under the government’s own quality control scheme | Govt Newspeak

What are you thinking?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: