Skip to content
Advertisements

Mother Suing Government Over Autistic Daughter’s Suicide Attempt In School Isolation Booth

April 3, 2019

A woman whose daughter tried to kill herself while in an isolation booth at an academy school is to take legal action against the government.

The child, who cannot be named, has autistic spectrum disorder and mental health problems, but was put in an isolation booth by her school in Kent for more than a month.

Prior to the intervention of lawyers in mid-March, she had spent every day since mid-January in isolation, meaning she had to remain silent throughout the day and had no directed teaching.

Lawyers from the firm Simpson Millar are now taking action against the Department for Education (DfE) on behalf of the girl and a boy at another academy in Nottinghamshire for failing to review its guidance to schools about the use of isolation. The schools cannot be named for fear of identifying the children.

In a pre-action letter seen by the Guardian, lawyers said extended time in isolation had had a significant impact on the girl. “It has caused her depression. It also led to her taking an overdose while in the isolation room itself,” they said. “Following pre-action correspondence from us, [the school] has removed her from isolation.”

The unregulated use of isolation booths – spaces in which children sit in silence for hours as punishment for breaking school rules – has been criticised in recent months.

In December, Simpson Millar launched proceedings against Outwood Grange Academies Trust (OGAT) on behalf of a boy who spent up to 35 days in isolation in one academic year. The case was dropped when the trust said it was reviewing its behaviour policy.

The boy involved in the latest action has ADHD. “Given his condition, sitting silently in a booth for the whole school day was difficult,” wrote the lawyers.

“However, the sanction for ‘failing’ the isolation room was another day in the isolation room. He thus ended up in a cycle of regular confinement in the booths.”

The letter says that he went from being “a cheerful and bubbly boy” to developing anxiety and depression.

Government guidance states that isolation rooms should only be used for “a limited period” and that “[a]ny use of isolation that prevents a child from leaving a room of their own free will should only be considered in exceptional circumstances”.

Lawyers criticised the lack of any upper limit for the amount of time a child could be kept in isolation. “Unlike if pupils receive fixed-term exclusions, there is no automatic mechanism for reporting the level of isolations to the governing body, nor do the cutoffs (15 days in a term, 45 days in a year) apply.”

They said that many schools appeared to have a system where pupils were required to repeat a day in isolation if they failed to adhere to the organisation’s behaviour policy the first time around.

Dan Rosenberg, an education solicitor at Simpson Millar, said: “Guidance on behaviour and discipline in schools needs to be much clearer; especially with regards the use of isolation booths which, evidence suggests, are being used as a ‘dumping ground’ for children, particularly those with special educational needs.

“What was originally a method for dealing with an immediate crisis in a classroom is now being used as a low-cost solution for the long-term management of pupils, to the detriment of their mental health and education. The current guidance is not fit for purpose, and as a result children are suffering.”

Rosenberg urged the government to urgently review its guidance on the use of isolation, paying particular attention to the impact of the use of isolation on children with disabilities. If the DfE does not respond positively to the lawyers’ letter then they will start judicial review proceedings.

The DfE has been approached for comment.

Advertisements
2 Comments leave one →
  1. April 3, 2019 2:21 pm

    Outwood Grange Academies Trust –
    https://www.outwood.com/our-team

    Child Abusing Criminal Nonces.

    Misconduct in Public Office –
    http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/l_to_o/misconduct_in_public_office/

    “Examples of behaviour that have in the past fallen within the offence include:
    wilful excesses of official authority;
    ‘malicious’ exercises of official authority;
    wilful neglect of a public duty;
    intentional infliction of bodily harm, imprisonment, or other injury upon a person;
    frauds and deceits.”
    “It carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.”

    Criminal Justice Act 1988 – Torture
    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/33/part/XI/crossheading/torture

    Martyn Oliver is the Chief Executive Officer and Accounting Officer of Outwood Grange Academies Trust.
    Is this Nonce and it’s rats in Prison yet?

    .

Trackbacks

  1. Mother Suing Government Over Autistic Daughter’s Suicide Attempt In School Isolation Booth — Same Difference – Introverted but Socially Concerned

What are you thinking?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: