Skip to content

End To Repeat WCAs – Many Mental Health Claimants Will Miss Out

October 11, 2017

With many thanks to Benefits And Work.

The criteria that the DWP are using to decide which claimants will no longer have to have repeat work capability assessments (WCAs) in order to continue receiving employment and support allowance (ESA) or universal credit have now been published. They show that many claimants with mental health conditions will not be considered, even though they are in the support group.

Substantial risk
Last week the government announced that claimants who have to attend a WCA from 29 September 2017 will not have to have repeat assessments if they meet certain, at that time undisclosed, criteria.

However, Disability Rights UK, who took part in the consultation on the changes, have published copies of the guidance on their website.

The documents make it clear that claimants who are placed in the support group because their mental health condition means that there would be a substantial risk to themselves or someone else if they were not placed there, will not be considered for exemption from further medicals.

This is in spite of the fact that the substantial risk regulations are a very common ground for claimants with mental health conditions being placed in the support group.

Detailed criteria
Instead, claimants can only be considered if they are in the support group because of one of the “functional descriptors” due to either a physical or mental health condition. These are are:

  • Mobilising 50m
  • Transfer independently
  • Reaching
  • Picking up and/or moving
  • Manual dexterity
  • Making yourself understood
  • Understanding communication
  • Weekly incontinence
  • Learning tasks
  • Awareness of hazards
  • Personal actions
  • Coping with change
  • Engaging socially
  • Appropriateness of behaviour
  • Unable to eat / drink / chew / swallow / convey food or drink


Claimants will also need to show that all of the following apply:

  • Their condition will last for the rest of their lives.
  • The effect of their condition means that they will always meet at least one of the support group descriptors above. The DWP say that conditions which might qualify, include: “Motor Neurone Disease (MND), severe and progressive forms of MS, Parkinson’s, all dementias, all chromosomal conditions, Huntington’s, severe irreversible cardiorespiratory failure, severe acquired brain injury …this list is not exhaustive” . The DWP also say that conditions which might not meet the criteriainclude “recently diagnosed relapsing non-progressive forms of MS or some people with less severe mental health conditions with periods of reasonable function”.
  • There is no realistic prospect of recovery, such as a transplant.
  • They have been diagnosed with an unambiguous medically recognised condition. This can include conditions such as ME/CFS and fibromyalgia.

No appeal
A health professional will make a recommendation as to whether a claimant meets the criteria for being exempt from further WCAs. A DWP decision make will make the final decision.

There is no right of appeal against a decision not to exempt a claimant from further WCAs

You can download the detailed guidance from DRUK.

7 Comments leave one →
  1. October 11, 2017 4:12 am

    Fake ‘Charity’ Disability Rights UK are being BRIBED directly by the DWP for all of this total “Improper Performance” –

    year ended 31/3/16 – Disability Rights UK got
    £204,500 from the DWP (bis and Disability Action Alliance)

    more £££ here –

    The Bribery Act 2010 –


    Here is what the DWP;s OWN Medical Protocol (Science) says about PTSD –

    Quote –
    “The slow recovery times show that, for purposes of disability assessment,
    ***TWO-YEAR*** reassessments, up to a ***6-YEAR MAXIMUM***, are indicated

    More of their “Evidence Based Medicine” Protocols
    here –
    and here –

    protocol [pro´to-kol]

    a detailed written set of instructions to guide the care of a patient or to assist the practitioner in the performance of a procedure.

    a written plan specifying the procedures to be followed in giving a particular examination, conducting research, or providing care for a particular condition.

    A local policy or strategy which defines appropriate action and guides how an activity should be performed.

    indication [in?di-ka´shun]

    a sign or circumstance that points to or shows the cause, treatment, or some other aspect of a disease.

    a reason to prescribe a medication or perform a treatment.

    The basis for initiation of a treatment for a disease or of a diagnostic test.

    a sign or circumstance that points to or shows the cause, treatment, etc. of a disease


    Fraud Act 2006 –

    Misconduct in Public Office –

    UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – Articles

    Criminal Justice Act 1988 –


    • October 11, 2017 4:38 am

      As DWP criminal filth say themselves –

      “Making yourself understood”

      Clearly I am completely unable to do that with public sector abusing swine.

  2. jeffrey davies permalink
    October 11, 2017 10:19 am

    do you honestly think these devils will if one does then you got more to learn off these devils jeff3

  3. October 15, 2017 12:05 pm

    Reblogged this on campertess.


  1. ‘Absolutely shameful’: Readers react as blind, housebound 62-year-old deemed ‘fit for work’ | Govt Newspeak

What are you thinking?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: