Tory ministers should be forced to pay compensation to 180,000 victims of a disability benefits scandal, Labour demands tonight.
The party has called on Tory welfare chief Esther McVey to fork out for thousands who were paid less Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) than they were owed.
The Work and Pensions Secretary is already handing over £970m in back payments, dating back to 2011, as 400 staff work to fix the blunder.
But in a letter to Ms McVey, seen by the Mirror, Labour now argues the government’s own guidance shows she should add compensation payments on top.
The guidance, issued by the Treasury, says public bodies that “have caused injustice or hardship” through “service failure” should consider “remedies”.
These can include financial payments, the guidance adds, and should restore victims to the state they would be in “had things been done correctly”.
Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary Margaret Greenwood and Shadow Disabilities Minister Marsha De Cordova warned the error could have caused “serious losses”.
In their joint letter, they said many people “may have been forced to live at below subsistence levels” with “severe restrictions on their lives”.
The MPs also questioned whether victims would be repaid for other, connected benefits, such as free NHS prescriptions and free school meals.
The pair wrote: “Some ill and disabled people will be waiting almost a decade to be repaid their entitlement to social security.
“And some will have tragically died without receiving the arrears owed.
“We urge the government to act immediately and provide compensation for the hardship experienced by those who have been affected”.
The blunder emerged last year when officials found errors when thousands of people were converted from the old incapacity benefit to ESA.
Earlier this month it emerged the number of potential victims had risen from 70,000 to 180,000 and the back payments bill had soared from £340m to £970m. It will take until December 2019 to pay everyone back.
DWP sources brushed off any suggestion they will pay compensation – and said the guidance had already been taken into account.
A spokesman said: “Whilst we transferred people to Employment Support Allowance (ESA), we transitionally protected their amount paid on Incapacity Benefit where appropriate so they saw no reduction in benefit.
“Where the error occurred, as we have made clear, was in ensuring that claimants received further funds to which they were entitled under ESA.
“We are committed to paying back all arrears owed, and are in the process of doing this – paying back around £120 million so far.”





Reblogged this on michaelsnaith.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on sdbast.
LikeLike
totally agree, way back in 2010 when I applied for ESA after I came out of hospital they added two disability premiums to the assessment rate of ESA, so much so that I had to read the letter nearly a dozen times, then it finally started to sink in one was a disability premium and the other was the severe disability premium and on top of that there was at least the WRAG component to be added if awarded ESA. Thankfully I was and that was added six weeks later and the back payments paid a week later.
In 2014 I ;lost the SDP as my son was with me but in 2017 I fought to get it back after kicking him out for using drugs and dealing they said phone this number so I threatened court if they didn’t reinstate SDP within 14 days and using email as a reasonable adjustment, they reinstated it rather than lose in court.
I also emailed the carers allowance unit and said he was no longer my carer and if they gave details of their account I would refund the £62.10 *2, and I still have the email to this day if they ever try and get me for an over payment it will go to court and I will only let the DWP know with the word see you in court you are going to lose big time and pay me more than the money you want to claim is an overpayment
LikeLike
Cool Wildthing,
You start talking about “courts” or “police” and the criminal vermin crawl back under their rocks to prey on easier victims.
You actually managed to get using email as a ‘reasonable adjustment’?
I asked for that way back in 2015 but the scum completely ignored it, and still are ignoring it. –
.
.
LikeLike