DWP Officers Fail To Turn Up At 80% Of Appeal Hearings
Government officials failed to turn up at four out of five welfare appeal hearings in a single month, according to shock figures seen by the Mirror.
A “presenting officer” represented the Department of Work and Pensions at just 1,790 out of 9,010 “first-tier tribunal” hearings against decisions over on employment support allowance and personal independence payments in September – some 19.8%.
That was a drop from a third in January 2018, according to stats revealed to MPs.
Figures from other months show a continuing plunge in the number of appeals where the Government is represented in person throughout last year.
Shadow Health Minister Justin Madders said: “It is a disgrace that in the majority of cases the DWP cannot even be bothered to turn up to the hearing to defend the original decision.
“They would sanction a person for not attending a job centre appointment but apparently do not believe the same standards apply to them.
“People are waiting far too long in an incredibly stressful situation to have their appeal heard and if the DWP aren’t going to turn up to these appeals they are not only causing unnecessary anguish to these people they are also wasting the court’s time and taxpayers’ money.
“The system needs a radical overhaul.”
In January last year presenting officers turned up at 4,020 hearings out of a possible 12,040 – 33%.
But that dropped to 3,120 out of 10,190 in March – some 31% – and fell to 29% the following month.
By July it was 24% and it hit 20% in August and September.
The Department for Work and Pensions said the Secretary of State is the respondent in first-tier tribunals and “responds to notices of appeal in writing”.
A written Commons answer from Welfare Minister Sarah Newton went on “Where the (Secretary of State) is additionally represented, in person, it is usually by a presenting officer.
“Presenting officers represent the department at tribunal hearings and provide valuable feedback to both decision makers and health care professionals.”
Ms Newton blamed “significant training and upskilling of presenting officers” for the plunge in attendance, and “normal attrition rates leading to a reduction in the number of presenting officers in post”.
In a written Commons answer, she added: “We expect that (first-tier tribunal) hearings attended by presenting officers will increase once training and current recruitment activity has been completed and will be monitoring this regularly.”
The DWP said some cases had more than one hearing, meaning a presenting officer may attend one hearing for a case but miss others.
A spokeswoman said: “In all cases we supply written evidence for appeals and continue to look at how we can improve the process for claims.”
Labour MP Neil Coyle raised the figures in the Commons, urging the DWP to “overhaul the whole process”.
DWP minister Sarah Newton told the Commons today: “We never ever intended to send a presenting officer to every tribunal. We send them to a sample so that we can learn.”
So how come “first-tier tribunal” Ahem ‘Judges’ haven’t heard of –
Fraud Act 2006 –
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/35/contents
Misconduct in Public Office –
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/l_to_o/misconduct_in_public_office/
Criminal Justice Act 1988 – Torture
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/33/part/XI/crossheading/torture
Care Act 2014 – Safeguarding adults at risk of abuse or neglect –
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/23/section/42/enacted
Criminal Attempts Act 1981 –
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1981/47/contents
Homicide: Murder and Manslaughter –
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/h_to_k/homicide_murder_and_manslaughter/
–
Aaahhh –
Salaried Judge of the First-tier Tribunal –
https://www.judicialappointments.gov.uk/vacancies/109
Salary: £110,335
KERCHINGGGG
The Bribery Act 2010 –
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/23/contents
Perverting The Course of Justice –
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/p_to_r/public_justice_offences_incorporating_the_charging_standard/
–
So who’s the vermin bribing all of those Course of Justice Perverting Nonces?
yup –
Secretary of State for Justice
Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Gauke
–
How come “Labour MP Neil Coyle” hasn’t heard of THE POLICE ???
LikeLike
These people at tribunal are not judges just ordinary people who put into these jobs other than a doctor but whot happened to being a tribunal without a dwp spokesperson has this is a farce on justice by them
LikeLike
!!!
Blimey!
Well… according to the Ministry of Justice –
https://www.judicialappointments.gov.uk/vacancies/109
“Proceedings
Tribunals often sit as panels consisting of a legally qualified chair (the judge) ”
And according to their Law –
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/15/contents
section-4 – Judges and other members of the First-tier Tribunal –
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/15/section/4
section 6A Certain judges who are also judges of the First-tier Tribunal –
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/15/section/6A
Senior Courts Act 1981 –
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1981/54/section/89
And for Upper Tribunals –
section 6 – Certain judges who are also judges of First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal –
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/15/section/6
–
They also have to swear two oaths –
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 –
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/15/schedule/2/crossheading/oaths
Promissory Oaths Act 1868 –
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/31-32/72/contents
Form of oath of allegiance.
The oath in this Act referred to as the oath of allegiance shall be in the form following; that is to say,
“I, , do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, her heirs and successors, according to law. So help me God.”
Form of judicial oath.
The oath in this Act referred to as the judicial oath shall be in the form following; that is to say,
“I, , do swear that I will well and truly serve our Sovereign Lady Queen Victoria in the office of , and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of this realm, without fear or favour, affection or ill will. So help me God.”
“according to law” – “after the laws and usages of this realm”
So any (fake) pig ignorance of their own LAWS is NO defence.
So ask the criminal what ‘Law’ qualifications it has…
Then ask their Quack what medical qualifications it has… better than an NHS consultant?? better that NHS Mental Health (quacks)??
Always Record Everything. Then call THE POLICE
Perverting The Course of Justice –
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/p_to_r/public_justice_offences_incorporating_the_charging_standard/
–
LikeLike
And of course… every single part of their ‘appeal’ BS is –
Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 –
Witness Intimidation –
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1994/33/section/51
Misconduct in Public Office –
http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/l_to_o/misconduct_in_public_office/
“It carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.”
Disability Hate Crime – Criminal Justice Act 2003 (section 146) –
Increase in sentences for aggravation related to disability –
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/44/section/146
Criminal Justice Act 1988 – Torture
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/33/part/XI/crossheading/torture
–
UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities – Articles
https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-2.html
UN Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CAT.aspx
LikeLike