Skip to content
Advertisements

Cancer, Double Incontinence, Refused PIP

December 19, 2017

“We need a root & branch reform of PIP. One of the people who came to ‘Feeding Birkenhead’ foodbank was doubly incontinent because of cancer.

She got a Nil rating for PIP.

Whilst she needed food, she also needed nappies.

When she didn’t turn up after a few days, people went to see how she was. She was washing(and reusing) those babies nappies that we had, because she wanted to get about and she was too ashamed to come and ask us for more.

Isn’t there something wrong with the PIP assessments when these sort of cases occur?” Frank Field, Labour MP

Advertisements
5 Comments leave one →
  1. December 19, 2017 10:34 am

    “Isn’t there something wrong with the PIP assessments when
    these sort of cases occur?” Frank Field, Labour MP” (who chairs the Commons’ Work and Pensions committee)

    The whole thing seems to be a quote from Frank Field, Labour MP, reported on thelondoneconomic.com

    Isn’t there something SERIOUSLY wrong with criminal MPs pretending that they have never heard of Social Services, The Police, The Care Act, The Fraud Act, Misconduct in Public Office, Vulnerable Adult Abuse, Torture, Murder, Hate Crime, Intimidation, and “Grave and Systematic Human Rights Abuses”.

    It’s INACTION speaks a lot louder than it’s BS crocodile tears.
    (probably getting itself off on it all)

    INACTION = “Wilful Neglect” = Misconduct in Public Office = Up To Life In Prison

    Misconduct in Public Office –
    http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/l_to_o/misconduct_in_public_office/

    Here are The ‘Public Duties’ of *ALL* Members of Parliament
    (that includes Jeremy Corbyns Gang) –
    http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmcode/1885/188502.htm

  2. December 19, 2017 11:27 am

    Reblogged this on sdbast.

  3. BdF permalink
    December 19, 2017 3:40 pm

    This refusal of PIP is a good way to CONTRACT the economy. The monies she would have received wouldn’t have been hidden in some Panama or Bahamas offshore account, but would have re-circulated in the general economy, from buying food, clothes, daily necessities, etc… It is as if the benefit refusal model is aiming at contracting the monetary mass. Good luck with that!

    • December 21, 2017 11:18 am

      Good economics point 🙂

      All of their vulnerable adult abusing hate crime costs a lot more than it saves.
      But then they are doing it because they enjoy it, abuse is what they get off on.

Trackbacks

  1. “Cancer, double incontinence, refused PIP” | Same Difference | COMRADE BOYCIE: VIVA THE ANTI-TORY/BIG BROTHER REVOLUTION!

What are you thinking?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: