Disabled people and their carers are being put at risk of catching coronavirus by returning to the workplace after being missed off the government’s vulnerable list, the Guardian has learned.
As Britain edges back to work, employers are understood to be denying some disabled people and carers paid leave to remain at home if they cannot provide a letter from the government showing proof of vulnerability, despite being at high risk from coronavirus or caring for someone who is.
The government’s register for extremely vulnerable people, which has previously been criticised for excluding a number of high-risk disabilities, is primarily designed to help signpost the need for food support. But it has emerged some employers are using the list as a condition for allowing employees to take paid leave.
Disabled people and carers who were not on the list told the Guardian they had been required to go into work by their employer or face dismissal when they could not show proof of vulnerability, with one worker forced to self-isolate between shifts in order to protect their disabled child.
They included key workers such as a teacher and a supermarket assistant. Harry Banes* has primary progressive multiple sclerosis but is having to go to work as a petrol station attendant. “The manager [has] little regard for social distancing. There are no restrictions on the amount of people coming in, and we only had a screen in front of the till last month,” he said.
Banes said he had asked to be furloughed but his boss had only offered statutory sick pay. “Because I didn’t make the government’s list, I can’t back up potential vulnerability.”
Four-year-old Charlie Sanders has type 1 diabetes with low immunity and is cared for by his parents, Jennifer and Michael. Michael stacks shelves in a supermarket, but because Charlie did not make the extremely vulnerable list, he said, his employer only offered unpaid leave. “We can’t afford that,” Jennifer said. “We’re scared stiff.”
Michael used three weeks’ holiday pay in April but has now had to go back to work. He is self-isolating within the home away from his family between shifts in order to reduce the risk. Last week, it meant he missed Charlie’s birthday. “I went into the garden and watched him open presents from a distance,” Michael said. “Charlie couldn’t understand why Daddy can’t hug him.”
Someone who is advised to shield in accordance with Public Health England guidance is entitled to statutory sick pay but this only applies to the 2.2 million people the government now counts as “clinically extremely vulnerable”.
Employers can also decide to furlough an employee who is shielding, but there is no legal obligation to do so. However, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) says employers have a legal duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled people if it is less safe for them to go to work than their non-disabled colleagues.
This comes after researchers warned 8 million people with underlying health conditions should be exempt from plans to get the country back to work, amid fears that they would catch the virus.
Most of those are not considered clinically “extremely vulnerable” by the Department of Health and Social Care, and so instructed to shield entirely for 12 weeks, but are still highly vulnerable to coronavirus.
Gemma Jones has ME and is cared for by her husband, Colin, who is a teacher. Despite being housebound, she did not make the extremely vulnerable list. Her husband was temporarily allowed to work from home when they explained the risk of contagion but his headteacher repeatedly called to ask for evidence of her susceptibility to the virus. “My husband has now been told he has to go back to school because I didn’t receive a letter to say I was officially high risk,” she said. “I’m terrified, honestly.
A government spokesperson said: “The clinically extremely vulnerable classification should not be used by employers to decide who can and cannot travel into work.
“We expect employers to be understanding where people aren’t able to work and need to stay at home on government advice. If an employee feels they have been unfairly treated by their employer, they should contact the Acas helpline for free and confidential advice on 0300 123 1100.”
Like millions of Britons, Jessica Kellgren-Fozard is at home. Unlike other workers, however, the impact of the coronavirus lockdown on her day job has been minimal. That’s because her home in Brighton with her wife and two dogs was already her office and her career is making YouTube vlogs for her 686,000 subscribers.
The deaf influencer, who posts upbeat videos about disability, LGBTQ+ issues, vintage fashion and other subjects, started her channel three-and-a-half years ago after she left a job as a presenter for a local TV station. Because she suffers from nerve disorder HNPP (hereditary neuropathy with pressure palsies), which results in extreme palsy in her arms and weak limbs, as well as a rare autoimmune disease called MCTD (mixed connective tissue disease), she was often unable to meet the demands of the job, and there were days when she couldn’t leave her bed.
“I really needed a more flexible way of working,” the 31-year-old says. “Trying to fit around someone else’s schedule was driving me into the ground and making me really unwell. So when I got married, my lovely wife said: ‘Why don’t you give YouTube a go? For six months I will financially support you – just have a go.’”
Success wasn’t instant. Like all YouTubers, she had to apply to the site’s partner programme to make money from adverts running on her videos. To achieve partner status, your channel needs 1,000 subscribers, and for people to have watched 4,000 hours’ worth of your videos a month. Kellgren-Fozard says she earned just £200 a month at the beginning. It wasn’t until one of her videos went viral and her subscribers swelled to more than 200,000 that she saw her business take off. Now she’s earning a five-figure salary and is the main breadwinner of the family.
As well as ad revenue, she makes money from partnering with brands to promote their products or services in her videos, and from members who pay a fee for access to exclusive content and privileges.
If you are at home now, watching viral cat videos or PE with Joe Wicks, and think you could do better, then join the two-metre spaced queue. As the number of people working from home and self-isolating increased, so did the number of people considering vlogging for the first time.
According to Google Trends, YouTube searches for “how to start a YouTube channel” increased by 230% between 14 March and 4 May, while searches for “how to edit videos” increased by 225% over the same period.
Research conducted by SEO agency Blueclaw claims that even filming mundane activities has the potential to make money. It looked at the most searched-for videos on YouTube and calculated how much the creator whose channel has been monetised stood to make.
For example, a video of someone shopping online could make them £1,523 if it is watched 1,160,988 times. Needless to say, that’s a lot of viewers, and some videos on YouTube struggle to get even hundreds of views.
Jennifer Quigley-Jones, founder of YouTube influencer agency Digital Voices, says it is about finding a new twist on a popular topic, for example, beauty looks inspired by specific music videos or films. Or food challenges, such as feeding a family for £5. With home schooling now widespread, explainer videos in education are also flying at the moment, she adds.
But while Kellgren-Fozard says the startup costs are minimal – initial videos can be shot on a laptop or smartphone camera and edited on free apps such as Apple’s iMovie – launching a successful channel requires a big time commitment. To launch her usual two videos a week, she works 60 hours coming up with new ideas, filming, editing and managing her social media.
The most important consideration, she says, is choosing the right content for your videos.
“For some it is working out what niche works best, whether you really enjoy making videos that are incredibly fast-paced and funny and chunkily cut together, messy and fun, or whether you want to make the long-form, slower pieces which people will have on when maybe doing the dishes or chopping food ready for dinner,” she says.
As Kellgren-Fozard found, getting enough subscribers to make your videos profitable is the real challenge. People subscribe usually once they trust your channel. If you are lucky enough to have a video go viral, that’s great, but unless you can convince people that you are more than just a one-trick pony and give them a reason to come back, you are not going to grow.
The key, Quigley-Jones says, is building up a bank of videos that shows what you specialise in, what type of content you consistently create and what your channel is about. Consistency is also vital – launch the same number of videos at the same time each week. Making longer videos, naming them in intriguing ways and tapping into trending topics as much as possible can also get your channel noticed in a sea of vlogs.
One of the biggest things that stops people starting their own YouTube channel is the idea that they have to be perfect, she adds.
“We are all perfectionists and deeply self-critical and anxious, but YouTube is not like TV. It’s not embarrassing to make mistakes,” she says. “So try to stop your perfectionist side. A lot of people stop themselves making videos because of that fear, especially women who are quite disheartened by criticism and nervous about how they might be perceived. So try to silence your inner critic and get something out there.”
The upcoming episode will be set entirely from Ben’s perspective as he takes part in his riskiest job yet with dad Phil.
Viewers will experience limited audio levels and on-screen subtitles showing words and fractured sentences to reflect Ben’s hearing difficulties, highlighting the reality many deaf people in the UK experience today.
Ben is struggling to come to terms with this new situation, a consequence of the Thames boat incident.
In upcoming episodes, viewers will see Ben determinedly try to prove to Phil that he’s still capable of helping him out with his dodgy dealings. But when his vital operation is postponed, Phil is unsure whether to let his son partake in their new job.
When the day of the job arrives and things quickly begin to spiral out of control, will Ben be in too deep?
The soap has been working closely with the National Deaf Children’s Society, audiologists and other experts in the field to ensure the storyline is portrayed as accurately as possible.
On the announcement of the special episode, EastEnders’ executive producer Jon Sen said: “The story of Ben’s struggle with his deafness has given us a gripping insight into his character. This special point of view episode is a ground-breaking episode unlike any other attempted in the history of EastEnders.
“Helmed by a compelling performance by Max Bowden, it allows the audience the opportunity to experience the world through Ben’s eyes and ears – a story communicated purely by his dialogue and the snatched words of those around him. I am so proud of what the team have achieved and cannot wait for the fans to see it.”
People living with dementia have said they are worried about leaving home, because weeks of the lockdown have had a profound impact on their confidence and abilities.
Teresa Davies, 66, from Flintshire, was diagnosed with early-onset Alzheimer’s disease when she was 59.
She lives alone and has found lockdown has affected her ability to carry out small tasks.
“The other day I put a pair of socks on my hands instead of my feet and put the yogurt back in the knife drawer instead of the fridge,” she said.
“I feel like my dementia is getting worse: I’m doing a lot more random things, like when I popped to the shop and realised I’d put on my blouse inside out – I’d never do things like that before lockdown.”
‘Like being diagnosed all over again’
Ms Davies, a former landscape gardener, usually spends a lot of time on the train travelling around the UK to give talks on dementia.
Now, she said she had concerns about her ability to travel and speak to large groups.
“My biggest worry is that I won’t be able to travel on the train and things because it (lockdown) really has knocked my confidence.
“I’m jumbling up words or forgetting what word I mean because I’m not as social as I was, which means I don’t want to talk as much, I’m nervous about it.
“People are isolated the moment they get diagnosed with dementia and going through lockdown, well it’s like being diagnosed all over again.
“And in Wales we’ve still got a few weeks left so I might be even worse then,” Ms Davies said.
Michelle Nelson-Greensmith, 57, from Merseyside, who has vascular dementia, said she had struggled to think about life outside of lockdown.
“I feel like I’m in an experiment,” she said. “I just don’t get it, I don’t understand why we’re in this situation.
“I just feel scared all the time and scared to go out now and after lockdown.
“I keep worrying I’m going to get the virus and if I see something online or on the news about it, it takes weeks for me to get it out of my head,” Mrs Nelson-Greensmith, who worked for the Environment Agency during the swine and avian flu outbreaks, said.
She has been able to go to the supermarket with the help of her husband, Richard, but found it difficult.
“I don’t understand what I have to do and I tell myself I’ve got to go one way and keep a distance then someone goes the other way and I have to stop and think whether I’m doing it, then I forget what I’m there for.
“All the new rules make me not want to go out really.”
But for Masood Qureshi, 56, from Stoke-on Trent, who has Alzheimer’s disease and fronto-temporal dementia, the lockdown has been a different experience, as he has been living with his three children and grandson.
“I feel like I’m one of the lucky ones because I have my family around me and it’s given me more time to spend with them and to reflect on this situation,” he said.
“But it has been stressful for them, I sometimes feel like I’m imposing.”
Mr Qureshi, a former factory worker and accountant, said he had been missing his support group and visiting the mosque during Ramadan.
“In my peer support group we’d be able to talk about our deep feelings on how we’re coping and sometimes it’s difficult to do that with your family,” he said.
“I’m missing the mosque a lot because you’ve got your friends there, the whole community is there and it’s a holy time at the moment, so not having chance to meet up there is very difficult.”
Mr Qureshi said he was not sure how lockdown would affect him in the longer term.
“I’m calling up my friends and I’m finding it’s taking all my energy to just speak to people,” he said.
“And in the back of my mind I’m concerned how people are coping because we’re all dealing with this in different ways, with our own frustrations.
“I’m just reminded, every Thursday (when we all come out for the clap) that we’re not alone even if we do feel lonely.
“I’m hopeful that the world will come out of this in a better place, society will be happier, and no one will take others for granted.”
Charities say nine million people could benefit from transparent face masks.
Deaf people can’t lip-read or see facial expressions through face masks or coverings, leaving them at risk of isolation and loneliness.
Transparent face masks would make a “monumental difference” to deaf people, charities say, along with tips for communicating with deaf people.
Millions of deaf people could face “months of misery” unless transparent face masks are made widely available, some of the country’s major deaf and disability organisations have warned.
Nine organisations, led by the National Deaf Children’s Society, have written to Public Health England and NHS England urging them to work together quickly to commission transparent face masks.
Without them, the charities say deaf people face a world where they can’t understand what’s being said to them, putting them at an even higher risk of isolation and loneliness at a critical time.
There are currently around nine million people in England who are deaf or live with a hearing loss and almost all of them rely on seeing someone’s face clearly, as it helps with lip-reading and reading facial expressions.
In the letter, the charities warn that this will become impossible if the general public now start to wear standard face masks or coverings. If transparent masks were also available however, they say it would make a “monumental difference” to deaf people across nation.
The coalition, which includes the National Deaf Children’s Society, Action on Hearing Loss, Royal Association for Deaf people, Action Deafness, British Deaf Association, Sign Health, British Association of Teachers of the Deaf, Sense and the UK Council on Deafness, also asks for any future Government guidance on the topic to include advice on speaking to deaf or deafblind people whilst wearing face masks or coverings.
The National Deaf Children’s Society has provided five tips for the public when they speak to a deaf person whilst wearing a face mask, urging everyone to take them on board:
1. Write it down
If speech isn’t working, write it down or use a text message.
2. Use an app
There are mobile apps that can translate speech into text – why not give one a try?
3. Keep it clear
If you can, use a face mask with a clear panel or a clear face visor so your face is visible.
4. Find a quiet place
This will make it easier to hear, especially if technology is used to support hearing.
5. Use video calls
If you don’t need to meet face-to-face, a video call with captions or British Sign Language interpretation may work just as well and you won’t need a mask.
Susan Daniels, Chief Executive of the National Deaf Children’s Society, said:
“This is an extremely challenging time for everyone and we’re relying on each other’s support, understanding and patience to get through it. Deaf people are no exception and if face masks or coverings become widespread, they could experience months of misery as they struggle to understand what is said to them.
“This could be even harder for children, who may not have the confidence to keep asking for things to be repeated and often find it easier to just pretend they understand.
“Transparent face masks would make a monumental difference to deaf people’s lives, but we’d also ask everyone to take these simple deaf awareness tips on board. They won’t make much difference to your life, but they will have a massive effect on ours.”
Steph Halder, President of the British Association of Teachers of the Deaf, said that her organisation had already been responding to queries and concerns from its members about the impact of face masks on deaf children.
“Deaf children rely on lip patterns to support their communication and also need to see peoples’ faces for emotional understanding. The use of face masks could have a negative impact on assessments and verification of hearing aids and auditory implants.
“Deaf children do not hear well over distance and may already be struggling with social distancing measures. Clear face masks would remove some of the barriers and ensure that deaf children are not put at a disadvantage.”
Linda Richards, Chair of the British Deaf Association, said:
“Don’t mask the message. Use of clear face masks and visors/shields with Deaf people is reassuring, reduces the risk of misunderstandings, and gives us the chance – indeed, the right – to be as fully informed and involved in our treatment as is possible. Don’t mask the message with an unnecessary barrier. Be clear. Go clear.”
Craig Crowley, Chief Executive of Action Deafness, said:
“We believe this clear face mask is urgently needed and will make a huge difference to patients being able to access their communication needs, especially in this serious COVID-19 pandemic period.”
Most days the 44-year-old cycles from her home in Cardiff to Cathays Park where she shares a stage with whichever minister or official is giving the latest coronavirus developments.
Ms McShane-Kouyaté never set out to be an interpreter.
After moving from Pembrokeshire to study at Cardiff University she took a night class in BSL to try to meet people and “fell in love with it”.
“I didn’t think of it as a career until years and years later,” she said.
She has been quietly freelancing for the Welsh Government for over a decade but this this is the first time it has been so public-facing – leading to her being recognised “a lot”.
“It’s funny,” she said.
“I’ve had it in places like the post office or from the security guard at Sainsbury’s.
“People who’ve seen my face over the years and recognise me as a customer say ‘Is it you who’s on the telly?’
“People I haven’t spoken to for years have been calling or emailing me, some people I haven’t seen since school, and neighbours.”
Ms McShane-Kouyaté said she is sometimes briefed on the content of the statement at the start of the briefing but does not know what questions journalists will be asking afterwards so cannot predict what the speaker will say in response.
“Sometimes it’s complicated messages, some days it’s very statistics-heavy and quite technical and you have to step up and do the best you can,” she said.
“Some days I worry it’s not the greatest interpretation. You can’t create beautiful BSL when the source you’re given is a load of statistics.
“It varies quite a lot. It depends who is presenting on the day, it could be someone who speaks very fast, or if their content is technical. There’s different challenges with different people.”
She said her job is to give a BSL interpretation of what has been said: “I’m not signing word for word what they’re saying,” she said.
“I’m trying to convey the meaning of what they’re saying in BSL.
“It’s the BSL equivalent.”
She said the first few days the briefing was televised she had lot of feedback from deaf people on things such as camera angles.
“There was a time they were panning to people asking questions so people were missing what the questions were,” she said.
She has also been getting feedback on her outfits: “I’d been wearing my one black suit for about a week… I washed it and put on a green dress.
“Then I got texts from deaf people saying it was a better contrast [as] I’m standing in front of grey or black drapes.
“We always wear black so your hands stand out better but because of the background I was being swallowed up.
“Since then I’ve been trying to find green things, but of course, like everyone, I can’t go shopping for clothes at the moment.”
‘Taken off guard’
Like many during lockdown, Ms McShane-Kouyaté is trying to strike a balance between being well-informed about the virus and having time away from it.
“In normal times I’d have the radio on in the morning, listening to the news and be watching news on the television but we’ve stopped that, it can be too much,” she said. “I’ve stopped consuming news.”
It led to a bit of a surprise for her during one of the briefings: “The day that Donald Trump spoke about disinfectant I hadn’t seen the news that morning.
“I couldn’t believe what I was signing. ‘Am I really hearing this right?’ I was really taken off guard,” she said.
“It would have helped if I’d heard that in advance.”
The rights of deaf people have made the news recently with campaigners starting legal proceedings against the UK government over a lack of sign language interpreters at its daily coronavirus briefings.
A Twitter campaign which started as #WhereIsTheInterpreter? has now morphed into a class action legal case.
But Ms McShane-Kouyaté is proud of the way Wales has included the deaf community: “[The Welsh Government] has led by example and shown a commitment to equality,” she said.
“I hope it [the daily briefings] is raising the profile of BSL. Hopefully it’s bringing equality issues to the fore…
“Deaf people have the same rights as other people and shouldn’t have to wait until later in the day [to get the same information].”
In a new mini-series, Meet The ‘Vulnerables’, Octavia Woodward sets out to find the real people dubbed “vulnerable” during the coronavirus pandemic, and turn the V-word on its head.
First up is Baroness Jane Campbell – who ranks as “the most influential disabled person in Britain” according to the Shaw Trust. She is considered a legendary figure within the disabled community for her ongoing fight for disabled rights.
Both Jane and Octavia have Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA), a serious genetic condition that weakens muscles and can cause difficulty with breathing.
Jane, who sits in the House of Lords, talks about her pushy parents, her brushes with the law during political protests, multiple marriages and how she struggled to like disabled people until she graduated from university.
Deaf people or those with hearing loss will struggle to communicate if more people wear non-medical face masks during the coronavirus pandemic, a charity has said.
Action on Hearing Loss said people could feel “even more isolated and scared” at an already difficult time.
It said there are more than 575,000 people in Wales with hearing loss.
Karen Robson, of Action on Hearing Loss, said: “We’re hearing a lot of concerns from the deaf community and those with hearing loss.
“Many people who are deaf or have hearing loss rely heavily on visual cues for effective communication, including facial expressions and lip-reading.
“Being able to see lip patterns and facial expressions is also vital for those who communicate through British Sign Language.”
Words which sound similar but have different meanings can become difficult to distinguish.
“Many of these people will be unavoidably impeded by face coverings,” Ms Robson said.
“This has the potential to create further isolation amongst an already marginalised community of people, causing additional stress and anxiety to people at an already very difficult time.”
With England’s advice to cover faces in some public places, it is anticipated more people in Wales will choose to wear masks too.
With more than 70% of the over-70s living with hearing loss, the charity said those people were also more likely to end up in hospital being treated for coronavirus.
There they can experience similar communication problems with nurses and doctors wearing personal protective equipment (PPE), due to being unable to lip-read or properly read expressions, and with sound more muffled by the equipment.
The UK government said it was supporting CARDMEDIC, which provides digital flashcards and other communication aids to NHS Trusts across the UK to help communicate with patients with hearing loss.
A woman from mid Wales, who did not wish to be named, said face coverings posed significant problems for her 11-year-old daughter who has hearing loss.
“British Sign Language relies heavily on facial expression which is why in itself it’s not an answer to the problem of mask wearing,” she said.
“It will help a lot but people who purely use BSL will miss out a lot on the facial expression aspect of the language, and most will use some level of lip-reading.
“It’s also really hard to sign without touching your face.”
‘Lasting trauma’
She said she was also worried about patients not being able to communicate properly.
“The difficulty of communication when wearing PPE is very near the top of my list of reasons why my daughter has to be kept safe [from coronavirus].
“The thought of her having to go to hospital, alone, with people who don’t know her and who can’t communicate with her, frightens me more than the illness.
“There are going to be people that it’s happened to who have lasting trauma because of it.
“I knew medics in PPE are verbalising their usually non-verbal stuff, literally saying ‘I am smiling at you’ to patients.”
Paul Myres, a retired Wrexham GP with hearing loss, said he too had heard of healthcare workers finding such ways to communicate.
Dr Myers, who was Public Health Wales’ lead for primary care quality and development for 10 years and a GP for 30 years, said: “Speech through masks is indistinct.
“Not only have I lost sound level but I have also lost some definition of speech, so any additional blurring makes interpretation difficult or impossible.
“I tend to move closer to speakers to catch what they say. This is not compatible with distancing.”
Dr Myers, 65, said he began to experience hearing loss in his 50s and used hearing aids, but had difficulty understanding his patients.
“I have trouble admitting disability but over the last two or three years of my working life I have informed people and asked them to speak clearly and indicate clearly if they wish to speak to me.
“I ask people to look at me. I don’t lip read as such but watching the lips does help. Understandably people, including at home, forget to look at me.
“As masks are not yet being used regularly in public, I have yet to find out how I and others respond to the difficulty in communicating – there is a temptation on my part to avoid conversation. It will be a problem.”
How can you help?
“Speak as clearly as possible, avoid soft voices but equally not speak too loudly,” Dr Myers said.
“Speak slightly slower than normal, but again if too slow it’s more difficult to interpret missed words if it takes too long to hear the whole sentence.
“Clearly speakers should not touch or lift their mask as that risks contamination. I think it may sometimes be necessary to write things down.
“I have seen masks which have a see-through area by the mouth. I wonder if it reduces the effectiveness of the mask but it allows those with hearing difficulty to see the lips move – and it also allows others to see more facial expressions, which may be reassuring to those who are anxious.
“I think it is worth making the effort to expressing how you feel. We can use our eyes but eyes alone may be misconstrued.
“The forehead may also be visible if head gear is not worn too low and that can show expression.
“Also to remember that people with hearing impairment are not (necessarily) stupid, so to avoid speaking down to them or in a patronising manner.”
Action on Hearing Loss said it had redirected its attention to address the challenges, and is promoting communication tips which include reducing background noise, writing things down, facing the person and using simple gestures.
It has launched a Covid-19 emergency appeal to provide hospitals with equipment to enable easy communication for patients and staff with hearing loss, and a BSL coronavirus information service.
It is hoping to raise £50,000 to buy 300 personal listening devices to help people in hospital.
A Broadway actor who had his right leg amputated while fighting Covid-19 has woken up from a medically induced coma, his wife has revealed.
Amanda Kloots said it was “a miracle” that husband Nick Cordero was on the road to recovery.
The Canadian actor, who was nominated for a Tony Award for the Bullets Over Broadway musical, has been in hospital in Los Angeles since the end of March.
Kloots has been posting regular updates about the 41-year-old’s condition.
A fundraiser set up to support the couple and their young son Elvis has raised more than $500,000 (£407,000).
Cordero was initially admitted to hospital on 30 March after being diagnosed with pneumonia, and later tested positive for coronavirus.
According to his wife, he went into septic shock while in hospital, had two “mini strokes” and had blood clotting complications that resulted in his leg being amputated.
Speaking on Instagram on Tuesday, Kloots said her husband was “extremely weak” but was “following commands which means his mental status is coming back”.
Cordero’s other theatre credits include stints in Waitress, Rock of Ages and the musical version of A Bronx Tale.
The brother of a teenage boy who took his own life has appealed for people to seek help if they are struggling with the psychological effects of lockdown.
Chris Mackell’s 17-year-old brother Matthew was found dead in Dunorlan Park in Tunbridge Wells on 7 May.
Mr Mackell said the A-Level student had been worried his grades would be affected by the closure of his school.
He called for “anyone that is feeling any sort of sadness and is dealing with anything” to speak out.
He said his brother had been fearful of his future, “probably because of the lockdown, where, obviously he’s not doing his work to the same quality, maybe, or he felt like he wasn’t in the right mindset to do it at home versus at school.
“He obviously didn’t see a way out of it.”
Ben West, who set up a mental health campaign after his 15-year-old brother Sam took his own life, said the isolating impacts of lockdown on young people should not be underestimated.
“I absolutely have no doubt in my mind that people who are already struggling are struggling much more because of lockdown,” he said.
“People that rely on people in their lives, such as friends that keep them happy, to not be allowed to see them, to have that lack of social connection, can really impact people’s mental health.”
The Care Quality Commission says there has been a 175% increase in deaths of people with learning disabilities living in adult social care organisations in England, compared with the same period last year.
But while elderly people are entitled to be tested for Covid-19, people with a learning disability are not.
BBC Breakfast spoke to disabilities campaigner, Sara Ryan, and Dr Dominic Slowie, former NHS national clinical director for learning disability.
Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) yesterday won a court of appeal battle on behalf of legacy benefits claimants, including an ESA claimant, who were wrongly forced onto universal credit and were worse-off as a result.
The claimants were forced to claim UC following errors by the DWP. But even when they won their appeals against the decisions, regulations prevented them from going back onto their former benefits.
PR, the ESA claimant, was £180 a month worse-off.
Another claimant, TD the mother of a disabled child, was £140 a month worse-off.
If the errors had not been made and they had eventually moved onto UC via ‘managed migration’ they would have had transitional protection to protect them from this sudden fall in their income.
The DWP’s reason for leaving the claimants worse-off was that it would be too administratively complex and expensive to correct these sort of mistakes.
The Court of Appeal held that this was not a sufficient justification to treat the claimants differently.
The DWP will now either have to return the claimants, and others like them, to their former benefits or top up their UC to make up the shortfall.
“Today’s judgment corrects a glaring injustice for the two households in this case, and many others in a similar situation, who end up worse off through no fault of their own. The court was clear that the way in which UC is implemented must comply with human rights. Claimants pushed onto UC when the DWP wrongly stops their old benefits should not have to tolerate an income drop that causes them real hardship simply because the DWP considers it is too costly or too complex to rectify its own mistake. Not least among those who will benefit from the judgment are children and adults who otherwise stood to lose out on crucial help with the extra costs of disability.”
On Sunday evening, Boris Johnson set out the roadmap for easing the lockdown in England. It was a complex and at times meandering speech. But it was striking that the prime minister said nothing of the next steps for people who are deemed high risk, who have previously been asked to “shield” from coronavirus by remaining at home for at least 12 weeks. Johnson notably paid tribute to “the fortitude of the elderly whose isolation we all want to end as fast as we can” but made no mention of disabled people enduring the same. Less than 24 hours later, it was confirmed that “the clinically extremely vulnerable” would have to remain at home and avoid face-to-face contact for “some time yet”.
In recent days there has been concern that high-risk groups may be asked to comply with an extended lockdown just when it is eased for the general population. One poll of disabled people found that only 4% thought an extended lockdown for high-risk groups was “fair”. Meanwhile, Ros Altmann, the former pensions minister, has warned against “blanket bans” to prevent older people leaving their homes, and the actor Michael Palin has said it would be “very wrong” to exclude over-70s from an eased lockdown as there are many who “are very active, very thoughtful, who’ve got lots of ideas”.
Some of this rhetoric is less than helpful. Evidence shows that age (even if the person is fit) and underlying health conditions seriously compromise immunity. It isn’t the government that’s discriminating against older or disabled people – it’s the virus. As a high-risk disabled person, I’ve been shielding at home for months without going out at all. It is not exactly fun, especially to not even get fresh air for an hour like everyone else, but it is sensible. My “ideas” won’t keep me out of ICU.
And yet it is not hard to see why there’s frustration. The guidance for disabled and older people has been so confused in recent weeks that even the health secretary seems to be unsure of whether they are included in the “clinically vulnerable” or extremely vulnerable category. A poll by the Research Institute for Disabled Consumers last week found that 52% of respondents disagreed or strongly disagreed that the government was doing enough to support them during this crisis (up from 44% four weeks ago).
Stuck at home, after watching Downing Street unveil its opaque new “stay alert” slogan, it felt increasingly as if shielders were being forced to suffer the worst of the government’s inaction – from the lack of early testing, delayed lockdown and failure to quarantine arrivals at airports at an earlier stage, to its dire communications strategy.
It is hard to shake the sense that the burden of keeping safe is being placed disproportionately on high-risk groups. A strategy of “keep the disabledinside”, with little to no clarity on what comes next, is as much an attitude problem as a policy one.
Cultural prejudice that equates being disabled with being isolated, unproductive or sexless reinforces the idea that it doesn’t really matter if this group has to give up months – even years – of our lives. If it’s thought that disabled people don’t have jobs to keep, kids to raise, or dates in the pub like “normal people”, it’s much easier to see leaving us at home indefinitely as no big issue. Ministers and the media repeatedly using the word “vulnerable” to describe disabled people in conversations around coronavirus only reinforces this.
The fear in all this is that a two-tier pandemic society is developing. Just as working-class people are being forced back to work while middle-class professionals are staying safe at home, we could see non-disabled people being slowly allowed back out while the disabled community is stuck inside.
Currently, we know more about how close a healthy person can sit to a friend in the park than when disabled people can leave their homes. In the coming months, there will be a need for compromise between high-risk individuals shielding and the collective actions of the rest of the public, be it immunity passports, mandatory face masks, or extensive track and trace (as well as a debate about the ethical and practical issues these actions raise). The fact that unequal access means disabled people were effectively segregated for years before this pandemic only makes this more pressing.
Any prolonged lockdown for high-risk individuals needs to go hand in hand with support from the state – from financial security for those unable to work while shielding, and an increase in disability benefits, to improved food supplies and testing for carers.
We’re already seeing widespread problems with disabled and older people struggling to access food and medicine while shielding. Expecting people to stay at home indefinitely when you can’t even guarantee them a supermarket delivery slot feels very much like being forgotten.
There is rocky terrain for all ahead, and those of us at high risk will have a particularly rough path to tread. And yet what shielders need is simple recognition: to be told the facts like adults, and to feel as if ministers remember we exist. Disabled people have long been used to making judgments about our own health: what’s a risk, what’s safe, what restriction can be overcome. As we wait in hope that Johnson will provide shielders with more details, ministers would do well to ask us what we need. Disabled people’s voices, like our lives, hold more value than society often thinks.
Claimants whose fixed short-term PIP awards are due to end will have them extended, a minister has confirmed this week, after the DWP initially said it would not do so.
“ . . . for those that would be due for reassessment in the next three months, we’ve automatically extended their benefit by six months. If their condition has deteriorated and they feel that they would be entitled to more money, they can still request a reassessment but otherwise they automatically are extended.”
However, as we warned readers in the most recent Benefits and Work newsletter, some claimants with short-term awards and especially those awarded by a tribunal, were being told that their awards could not be extended.
The matter was raised with Tomlinson on 11 May by Labour MP Karyn Smyth, who asked:
“On 4 May, the Secretary of State assured the House that the Government would provide an automatic extension of PIP awards that are due to expire during the coronavirus virus pandemic. Can the Minister confirm that this extension applies to all claimants, including those who received an award following an appeal?”
Tomlinson responded:
“There was an issue for those on fixed-term, short awards, but we have now addressed that, and those claimants will continue to get an automatic six months’ extension if it is due in the next three months.”
We are still advising readers who think they should be covered by this extension to check with the DWP that it will actually be applied in their case..
When people stand at their door to clap every Thursday evening, they might be applauding NHS staff or social care workers. But how many are thinking about the country’s army of unpaid carers?
For the past eight years, my brother and I have been caring for my mother, who has early onset dementia, diabetes and other health issues. My brother bears most of the burden, but most days I make the two-bus, six-mile journey to visit.
My brother and I wash, dress and feed Mum. I wash her hair and do her nails once a week. We administer eye drops every day, as she’s had cataracts. She has incontinence issues and we administer a weekly enema. We have little to no support from the NHS or social services. The district nurse visits every three months to change her catheter, but other than that we’re on our own.
Even before lockdown, carers were on the edge of everyday life. Hopefully their neighbours would have known and understood their responsibilities, but now they’re trapped behind closed doors, they are invisible. I fear for their mental health. If I was living with my mother, if it was just her and me, the social isolation would be unbearable.
If carers were isolated before the coronavirus crisis, we’re invisible now. I know my mental health has suffered since I became a carer. My anxiety rears itself every time I have to leave my flat and cat. Every day has been more or less the same for years – being carers has prepared me and my brother for lockdown.
There are approximately 6.5 million unpaid carers in the UK. That’s more people than are employed in the army or work in the NHS. But we are not valued, we are just ignored. When you think about it, if there are up to 6.5 million carers, that means there are 6.5 million people being kept away from hospital.
These people are propping up the NHS, even if it is by a gossamer thread. They are serving their community. Via social media, I’ve asked Matt Hancock, the health and social care secretary, and the care minister, Helen Whately, if they know the difference between unpaid carers and care workers.
I am concerned about the impact on child carers too. There are 800,000 young carers in the UK; the responsibilities they are going to have to take on are far larger, because they may also be caring for siblings as well as their parents.
Unpaid carers need as much recognition as any other frontline worker; I feel quite moved that the government has finally announced that they will have access to Covid-19 testing.
It’s difficult to know what support there could and should be for unpaid carers, but we need somebody to put their hand up and take responsibility for the altruism of these people.
GPs know who the carers are in their area. They could work closer together with local councils to give support, even if it was just someone turning up for a couple of hours to give that carer the chance to go for a walk or have a meal in a restaurant. I have not been to the pub for years; I used to love to go to the pub.
It has taken them their entire 10 years in government for the Conservatives to recognise that social care exists and there is a care crisis. The parties are battling about how to handle it when they should be working together to resolve it. They should be consulting carers, not thinktanks, on what steps they should be taking. I want to see affirmative action. The government needs to take responsibility. The care crisis is real and will only get worse.
How I have maintained actual sanity amid my own anxieties is miraculous. In all of this, despite my social isolation, poverty, ill health and lack of time to do anything, I still want to help my mum. I also want to help and shout loudly for those who have no voice. I do sometimes ask myself why should I bother, because no one seems to care. But I care for those carers who are still caring.
But with the training centre in Wales closed and roads quiet, there are concerns visually impaired people may have to wait longer to get a dog.
Volunteers, known as boarders, are instead using video lessons to keep training going around the house and garden during the coronavirus lockdown.
Guide dog instructor Amy John said they were going “above and beyond”.
From when they start their training at about 12 months old, guide dogs live with their boarder and are taken every day to the Guide Dogs Cymru training centre to learn essential skills.
But when social distancing measures came in, the training centre had to close, leaving it up to the volunteers to try to train the 15 dogs from their living rooms and gardens.
“They can still go out for their daily walks, or for a free run, and that’s been invaluable for the moment,” said Amy.
But with cafes and restaurants closed and less traffic on the roads, Amy said the puppies were not able to get used to many of the daily challenges guide dogs have to face.
“We take our dogs into shops and cafes, we use public transport regularly to get them used to being on buses, but at the moment all that is completely off,” she said.
Amy and her dog Bryngwyn are making videos of exercises and then sending them to the boarders, who are practising them with the dogs and sending back footage for feedback.
They may look like games, but the tricks teach essential skills, such as hand touching and putting their heads on seats, which are important to keep their owner safe and provide reassurance.
“They’re so used to going out and about while they are with us, so it’s important that we keep up this up, to keep their little minds going,” Amy said.
Near the end of their training, which normally takes 16 weeks, the dogs are “matched” with a visually impaired or blind owner, with factors like the dog’s speed taken into account.
But this has been paused until the lockdown ends.
“It was a real shame, we did have some dogs that were nearly at the end of their training and were ready to be matched,” Amy said.
Currently there are 59 visually impaired people on the waiting list for a guide dog in Wales.
But even with the volunteers’ efforts, with dogs unable to practice essential skills like guiding across busy roads and on to trains and buses, owners may have to wait a little longer.
“It will be challenging for the dogs, it will mean that when they do come back into training with us, and we are able to start training them again, it might just take that little bit longer,” Amy said.
“We will have to work quite hard on to make sure that the dogs are really confident before they are matched with a client.”
‘Victor was a bit afraid of the cardboard’
It is not just the guide dogs in the making being kept busy during lockdown – some old dogs are being taught new tricks by their owners.
Heather Worofka from Wrexham is using her time during the lockdown to teach her two-year-old guide dog Victor more skills.
Heather, 25, who is blind, has made a game using a cardboard box and a carrot, which she is using to try to teach the labradoodle, along with her retired guide dog Una, who she now keeps as a pet.
“Victor was a bit afraid of the cardboard and Una kept trying to climb into the box,” she said.
“We’ve also been testing Victor’s concentration and obedience in the garden, with my mother holding a squeaky toy and food, but fair play to Victor, he’s not distracted.”
Andrea Gordon of Guide Dogs Cymru said while visually impaired people may have to wait longer for their dogs, the efforts of the boarders were making a difference.
“A significant number of people with sight loss live alone, and the current restrictions can leave them feeling cut off from their usual support networks of friends and family,” she said.
“Many are not online, so Guide Dogs staff are making regular phone calls to check on the well-being of every single service user, helping them to access the practical support they need.
“We’ve explained that face-to-face training cannot take place at the moment as we are following government advice on social distancing.
“As an organisation, we are currently planning for such time as services can safely resume, and our plans are reviewed daily, based on the latest advice from the government.”
“Every day I say thank you to someone in our country for doing something special,” Mr Johnson said.
“And today I want to say thank you to you. Your daily walks are an amazing fundraising feat.
“Well done and thank you for all you have achieved for our wonderful NHS.”
Reacting to the announcement, the Mills family said the “thanks really should go to all those who made it happen”.
“What started as a very simple, spur of the moment response to seeing Captain Tom Moore do his fundraising walk, has become an incredible amount of money raised for an excellent charity,” they said.
“As a family we’ve been utterly overwhelmed not only by the amount of money given but by the lovely messages of support and encouragement.”
Frank’s response was simply: “Cool!”
As well as having spina bifida – a condition where a baby’s spine does not develop properly in the womb – Frank was also born prematurely at 25 weeks.
He has received care from both Southmead Hospital and the Bristol Children’s Hospital and wanted to raise the money as a thank you to the NHS.
The money will go to NHS Charities Together – an umbrella organisation that supports health service charities.
She has Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and is gaining a little bit of weight thanks to comfort eating. It’s putting a strain on her already inflamed joints but should she start being disciplined or stop feeling guilty as we are in a pandemic after all!
Worst of all, Holly, who is on immunosuppressants – suddenly feels poorly. Is she showing Covid-19 symptoms?
Produced by Amy Elizabeth – email amy.elizabeth@bbc.co.uk to get a message to Kate and Holly.
Blog from me for @NDCS_UK on face masks and what this means for communication with deaf children. Really hope the Government starts to engage with this issue https://t.co/DGrfPEjGes
Robyn Steward and Jamie Knight, presenters of the podcast 1800 Seconds on Autism, join the Cabin Fever team to reveal what’s been going on in their lives during lockdown.
From the pasta dish Jamie has eaten every day for five years no longer being available at the supermarket, through to Robyn’s solo trip to hospital, a notoriously noisy and discombobulating place.
What do you do if you need a solid routine but everything has changed or stopped?
Featuring Emma Tracey, and produced by Emma Tracey and Beth Rose.
The report says many of the 1.3 million pupils in England with SEND are not getting the support they need and end up being excluded from school, damaging their education, wellbeing and future life chances.
Prior to the coronavirus outbreak, the funding crisis in SEND and shortcomings in provision were high on the political agenda. Ministers responded with additional investment and the promise of a review of services, which is yet to be published.
The new report by MPs on the public accounts committee depicts a system in which “desperate” parents fight to secure an education, health and care plan (EHCP) – a legally enforceable package of support for those most in need – which has become seen as a “golden ticket” to get adequate support.
About 20% of children with SEND succeed in getting an EHCP, the report says, while a remaining one million children with SEND but no EHCP do not have the same legal entitlements and are at risk of missing out on support they need in overstretched mainstream schools that are under financial pressure.
MPs on the committee criticised the Department for Education (DfE) for failing to get to grips with the mounting pressure in the system and said ministers were not doing enough to try to understand the reasons for significant disparities between different groups of children and the support they receive.
Almost twice as many boys as girls are identified as having SEND, the report says, and there are large disparities across different regions and between ethnic groups, with 8% of Chinese pupils with SEND compared with 15.5% of black students.
MPs were also concerned about the disruption caused to children’s education by high levels of exclusions among students with SEND. Almost half of all permanent exclusions (44.9%) in 2017-18 were pupils with SEND, “levels even the department admits are unacceptable”, the cross-party committee said.
“Pupils with SEND deserve the same quality of education and to get the same value from our education system as their peers,” said Labour’s Meg Hillier, the committee chair.
“Disturbing disparities in identifying pupils with SEND, and in provision for them, point to underlying problems that can only be addressed through proper data collection and information.
“These children, already facing extra hurdles and challenges in this life, must not find themselves discriminated against several times over.”
Responding to the findings, Rosamund McNeil, the assistant general secretary of the National Education Union, said: “Dramatic funding cuts to local authority and school budgets have led to a loss in confidence for many parents that their child will receive appropriate SEND support.
“For many, the EHCP is seen as the only way of accessing the education provision their child needs. Sadly, this doesn’t always provide the golden ticket they are looking for.”
Geoff Barton, the general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), added: “The PAC’s report paints a stark picture of a system for supporting children with special educational needs which is poorly funded and ridiculously complicated.
“It is important to understand that many teachers and support staff do an amazing job for these young people despite these circumstances, but they need more backing from the government in the form of sufficient funding, and a system which is more streamlined and less bureaucratic.”
A DfE spokesperson said: “We are committed to supporting the safety and wellbeing of children with special educational needs and disabilities, and are working to ensure they get the help they need during the coronavirus outbreak.
“Only those with the most complex needs will require an education, health and care plan, but every child deserves the opportunity to thrive in education.
“Our SEND review will look at how to improve the whole system for those children, young people and their families, who need additional help to access the support they need.”
Tyrese Dibba, who has Charge Syndrome, and is deaf and partially sighted, released the videos with charity Sense in a bid to tackle isolation among people with disabilities.
The Birmingham student said more people learning BSL would “help the deaf community feel part of wider society”.
More than 7,000 people have signed up for the free classes.
“I want more people to learn to sign, so deaf people don’t get excluded,” Tyrese said.
“You should be able to chat to someone, whatever their disability might be.
“After all, no one likes feeling left out.”
‘Proud to be deaf’
His mother, Vicky Dibba, added: “I’m very proud of how Tyrese just got on with filming, not hiding any of his personality.
“Tyrese is proud to be deaf and feels more people should treat everybody equally and I’m happy to support him.”
Richard Kramer, chief executive of Sense, said: “BSL is the first language for hundreds of thousands of people who are deaf, and if more people are able to use it we can ensure that less people are left out, helping to tackle loneliness and social isolation amongst disabled people.
“It’s really fun to learn and an ideal time to learn, with so many of us stuck at home looking for new things to do.”
Benefits and Work have had over 100 responses so far to our survey of PIP claimants who have had telephone assessments, with some shocking privacy and access issues emerging. It is still not too late to contribute to the survey if you have had a telephone assessment.
We’ll be publishing a detailed look at the results in the next newsletter, but here’s a few early ones
Notice It is a legal requirement that you receive written notice of a telephone assessment. Yet this did not happen in around a third of cases, with 18% of respondents saying they only got a phone call and 14% saying they didn’t get any warning at all.
Notice should also be at least a week in advance. But only 60% of respondents said they received the legal one week’s notice, with 22% getting less and 14% getting none at all, while 5% couldn’t remember.
Length Most assessors are punctual in making their calls, with only 13% of you saying your call did not take place on time.
Expect your assessment to be a long one. Almost 50% said their call lasted over an hour, with a further 40% saying it lasted between 30 minutes and an hour. One person commented that theirs took an extraordinary three hours.
Technical issues and recording 17% of respondents had technical problems in the course of the call. Low volume and patchy signal were the main issues, along with the odd battery dying.
Almost 20% of you have chosen to record your assessment. As expected, people who told the assessor they were recording their assessment were told to stop and people who asked permission were refused.
Assessors and privacy The assessors were, in general, reasonably pleasant in their approach. 53% described their assessor as encouraging, whilst 43% said they were neutral. Just 4% found them to be unfriendly.
Worryingly, however, 13% of you said the assessor seemed to have problems with having a quiet, confidential place to work from. That figure should be 0%. One person told us, shockingly:
“I could hear other people laughing and making comments in the background. Then someone saying sshhh”
Access And there were some people for whom a telephone interview was very clearly a breach of the Equality Act, but it went ahead anyway:
One claimant had to get her daughter to help her and explained:
“I am severely deaf. I found it really difficult I was anxious had a severe headache half way through call . . . Telephone assessments are not suitable for deaf claimant they need to be face to face to be able to lip read the person to be successful to get the help a deaf person needs to fulfil their life as being deaf is a everyday problem for us”
We’ll have a more detailed breakdown of the result in a fortnight. Meanwhile, if you’ve had a PIP telephone assessment please do complete the survey. It’s all multiple choice with the option to add comments and, on average, people are taking less than 5 minutes to complete it.
The coronavirus pandemic has caused daily difficulties for everyone. But what if you are visually impaired? Blind journalist Kate Pounds explores the particular challenges the virus has thrown up.
As the train approached London Waterloo on my last journey home from work before lockdown, a fellow passenger remarked he didn’t want to press the button to open the doors because of Coronavirus.
It got me thinking. As someone who cannot see, I have to touch objects and surfaces much more than your average person.
Just at the station I have to feel around the ticket machine to find the card reader, touch the escalator’s moving handrail to see if it’s going to take me up or down, and touch the side of the train doorway to gauge the width of the gap I’m so often reminded to “mind”.
Added to these obvious hygiene problems, it’s also harder to find a bathroom or alcohol gel point when you want to wash your hands.
So how are other visually impaired people adapting?
Sajid Ali, a 40-year-old market researcher from West Yorkshire, says a trip to the supermarket is difficult – holding a week’s shop in one hand and a white cane in the other makes navigating a challenge.
He says he can lose balance and that it’s hard to walk in a straight line.
He says he usually asks for help to find the items he needs, but getting that vital assistance has proved challenging recently.
“They said they were not sure they could help because of ‘current things going on,'” he says. “I guess it was a contact thing, because of having to take someone’s arm for guiding. I waited around for over five minutes, and in the end they did help.”
Just getting to the shops is a challenge for Reanna Parkinson, 22, from Lancashire.
“There are a lot of main roads around here and hardly any crossings so I can’t get to other shops safely on my own,” she says.
Her dad gave her a lift last time but she feels this threatens the safety of her mum, who is classed as high risk and needs to shield for 12 weeks.
Reanna, a graduate in criminology and sociology, values her independence but says she now may have to move in with her parents to survive.
“Normally I get a delivery, but all the slots have been taken,” she says. “Some online services say they have prioritised people with disabilities for delivery slots. I’ve seen a lot of tweets from blind people asking how they get these priority deliveries but I haven’t seen any responses.”
But even if you manage to get a slot, shopping online is no picnic. For blind and visually impaired people, the process involves many more steps and is far slower, which matters when everyone is rushing to buy.
Sajid says by the time he had listened to the electronic voice of his screen reader, which tells him what’s available, other shoppers had already bought the items he needed.
“I’m worried everything will be out of stock by the time I’ve even looked,” he says.
Another issue with online shopping occurs when items are sold out and substituted, which can be a far bigger problem for some people with multiple impairments.
Hampshire mum-of-three, Mandy O’Malley, 42, has allergies, diabetes and children with particular dietary needs, so if the delivery people arrive with items she has not researched, she has to turn them away.
“In our delivery yesterday we had seven items unavailable and 14 substitutions,” she says.
Despite needing them, she had to decline the items because she couldn’t read the packaging, and social distancing meant the driver couldn’t help.
She isn’t alone here. In 2017, the RNIB reported that the employment rate among visually impaired people was around 25%, compared to 81% for the UK generally, putting them among the poorest in society.
The charity also reported higher rates of isolation and subsequent depression among sight-impaired people in normal times.
Sajid, who usually enjoys taking part in his local Parkrun at the weekend, is concerned that a lack of contact with people will get worse during the current crisis.
“I think there will be some lonely days ahead. Usually I work and go out, but I still spend a lot of time alone, I am used to it, but with all the restrictions I could get really isolated.”
Despite these difficulties, many of the sight-impaired people I spoke to reported they were managing well. Some feel the complications of coronavirus are the same for them as for sighted people.
And Sajid thinks visually impaired people’s strategies and resilience may sometimes put them at an advantage in tough times.
“There’s always a lot to concentrate on for visually impaired people, it’s ten times harder,” he says. “You’ve got to keep your sense of humour.
“We face this kind of stuff every day so we probably have more of that humour in the locker.”
Our daughter, Liora Sarnaik, age 13, has an education and health care plan and a social worker, so meets the government’s definition of vulnerable and should have been able to go to school when lockdown started. I actually thought I might be one of those people who work from home, learn how to bake a cake, sort through the attic, have Zoom chats. But Liora hasn’t been at school.
Today there are only 15 children attending Liora’s excellent special needs school, Downs View in Brighton. Normally there are more than 100. Liora is not one of the 15: these are all children who live in residential care because their families have not been able to cope with caring for them. So they don’t have a choice about going to school.
Liora has three life-long conditions: uncontrolled epilepsy, a chronic kidney condition and autism. She can’t speak and she’s doubly incontinent. She’s beautiful, upbeat and humorous and her father, Rahul, and I adore her.
I desperately want to send her to school because without it she is home full-time and needs someone to care for her, all day every day, from the moment she gets up to the moment she sleeps, no weekends off. My last day off was before lockdown.
So why are we not sending her to school? On the first day of the lockdown, I spoke to a school staff member on the phone. “It’s up to you, of course, but I wouldn’t send her,” he said. “I can’t see how it can be safe.”
Many of the pupils, like Liora, don’t have language, they can’t speak or understand more than simple words such as food, drink, toilet. The majority have saliva issues; they dribble and wipe their mouths on any available person or surface. They don’t know how to wipe their noses, they are not able to wash their hands without help – and often resist it. They don’t know how to social distance, they don’t know anything about the pandemic. Many are also violent to parents and teachers and they are not able to stop biting, punching and kicking. Liora is not violent to others, but she is to herself, banging her own head with her fists when in pain or frustrated. She needs close physical contact at all times to be cared for properly.
Liora’s headteacher, Adrian Carver, says if he lets more children into school, they could simply die of contracting coronavirus. These are his words, not mine, because it will be impossible to keep them – and his staff – safe. He’s having to turn desperate parents away, which he hates doing, as he knows how hard it is for us.
It’s pretty glib, then, of the government to announce that all children meeting the vulnerable criteria will receive an education. Clearly he has no understanding that thousands of disabled children can’t go to school, and thousands of families in utter crisis are having to care for their children full-time. The Disabled Children’s Partnership has just launched a survey focusing on the “hidden” lives of families with disabled children during lockdown; the findings will be announced some time in May, and I expect there will be many stories like mine.
Parents like myself can’t provide what a school can offer. We have constant big challenges with personal care, with behaviour, and with sleep deprivation, as our children are often up in the night. As well as being on the receiving end of violence. “Today I’ve been punched, kicked, had an umbrella smacked around my head, been screamed at, he’s smashed up the house AGAIN,” a parent wrote on one of my WhatsApp groups. Without school, it’s not only our children who are vulnerable, it’s the whole family: siblings hide in their rooms to get away from the behaviour, parents are close to breakdown. Liora’s father and I have a sense that we are expected to just suck it up.
So what do we need? I want recognition at the highest level for families caring for their disabled children. I want to know that, if Liora’s dad and I fail to survive looking after her full-time, there will be a place for her in residential care, a place she can be safe. However, there are no places in residential care in normal times, never mind in lockdown.
And I want professional carers to be valued and paid properly for their extremely specialist skills caring for children like Liora. Skilled carers leave their jobs because their wages are so low. Us parents are in a constant fight with each other, first to get carers and then to keep them – we are like rats in a trap.
It’s about recognition. It’s about not being forgotten.
Loretta Charles-Cregan, an 18-year-old A-level student, considers herself lucky because her school gave her a laptop to help her do her GCSEs when she was made temporarily homeless after her house flooded. “It’s the only reason I can do my work now,” she says. “It was a blessing in disguise.”
Many students from low-income families like Charles-Cregan’s lack the basic technology they need to study online, including access to a laptop and a reliable broadband connection, along with a quiet place in which to work and complete assessments. But as universities rapidly gear up to deliver their courses online in September if social distancing measures continue, some students are worried about how they will cope.
The prospect is already influencing Charles-Cregan’s decision-making. While she still plans to attend university in September, the coronavirus crisis has made her consider choosing her offer at a London university to stay closer to her home in Ilford. But this wouldn’t solve the problem of how to actually do her work.
“It’s made me a bit more anxious,” she says. “We have the cheapest WiFi, it drops all the time. When I was doing A-levels I went to the library instead, but you can’t do that now. And there’s a lot of us in one house, my family’s quite big, so it’s not somewhere I can get motivated for work.”
Social mobility experts are warning that the shift to online learning could severely hold back some students, including those from poorer backgrounds, care leavers, students with caring responsibilities and those with disabilities. A National Union of Students survey suggested that one fifth of students struggle with access, while over half of students who rely on assistive technology felt they lacked the support needed to continue learning.
The NUS is now pressuring universities to better accommodate struggling students through a national approach to exams and assessment. “The most impacted are already the most disadvantaged. This makes no sense when there are solutions available to help them and all students,” says Claire Sosienski-Smith, NUS vice-president for higher education.
“We’ve got to be really careful that digital provision doesn’t compound the inequalities we already see in the educational system,” agrees Anne-Marie Canning, chief executive of social mobility charity The Brilliant Club.
One solution, Canning says, would be for universities should redirect general bursaries aimed at low income students towards kitting them out with the devices they need for online learning.
Some universities are already starting to do this: York has set up a philanthropic fund to support students with online learning, Coventry is exploring making courses accessible by mobile phone, and one other university plans to provide all its disadvantaged students with WiFi dongles.
But Emma Hardy, the shadow universities minister, says that these hardship loans can be difficult for students to access. “They’re limited, bureaucratic and very difficult to get paid out,” she says.
Challenges for disadvantaged students extend beyond access to technology. According to research from 2017, these students consistently perform worse through online learning than they do in face-to-face classrooms. “Taking online courses increases their likelihood of dropping out,” the authors wrote.
Chris Skidmore, the former universities minister, warns that these students already struggle with feelings of belonging and are already more likely to drop out of university.
“Remote learning must not allow these groups of students to become ever more remote,” he says. “We can’t afford for care-leavers, estranged pupils, and those from vulnerable and deprived backgrounds to miss out on their potential.”
Ian Dunn, deputy vice-chancellor at Coventry, says that his university plans to monitor the extent to which students are participating in their courses to give clues as to their wellbeing.
Martin Weller, professor of educational technology at the Open University, suggests that the mingling that happens naturally on campus can be partly reproduced through incorporating icebreaker and discussion activities into online curriculums. “There’s evidence that students who form social bonds tend to stick with a course and not drop out,” he says.
Weller adds that universities need to provide far more structured pastoral care. “That might be problematic for lots of universities that [rely] on precarious staff to provide teaching. Are they going to give them appropriate time and payment for providing a half-hour catch up every week with every student?”
Lucy Gill-Simmen, a lecturer at Royal Holloway University, has offered Zoom catchups to all 70 of her personal tutees to make sure they are coping with the shift to online. “It has a huge impact on my workload,” she says.
But she considers it essential to support her students’ mental health. She’s noticed that some are struggling with the lack of a designated study space and proper equipment. “That demotivates them, they don’t feel they’re able to get up and get working.”
Disabled students are also finding support patchy. Piers Wilkinson, NUS disabled students officer, says that although the Disabled Student Allowance funds laptops, it doesn’t cover everything.
“People like myself and others that did computer-based modelling or music and media can’t run the fundamental pieces of software that are required by their degree. So they would have to use the specialist IT suites in their department or university library. With those being closed, they’ve lost access to that.”
Wilkinson adds that although disabled students have been asking universities to roll out lecture capture for years, many have been slow to do this, and staff have not been trained on how to make video content accessible and inclusive.
Deaf students in particular find it difficult to lip-read on screens and understand seminars in which multiple people are speaking, and report that many universities do not yet supply subtitles or a British sign language interpreter. Autistic students say they are struggling with the anxiety caused by new systems.
One student from Kingston University, who has dyslexia and dyspraxia, says she is struggling to cope. “I have challenges with coordinating and I find using the online portals unfriendly. It takes me a long time to work it out, and this is not factored in when sessions start,” she says. “I’m finding the entire ordeal very stressful and I have emailed lecturers, but I’ve received no reply.”
A Kingston University spokesperson said: “Students are able to access learning materials through the university’s easily accessible virtual learning environment, Canvas, which is functioning as normal, and we are making additional adjustment for students with statement of special needs, including making available assistive technology and human support during the assessment period.”
I have just seen one of the best segments ever on Victoria Derbyshire.
A viewer, Anastasia Tempest, was being interviewed about how she is lonely and finding lockdown very difficult. Isolation, she said, is worse than her Cerebral Palsy.
She just happened to mention that she couldn’t go out even if she wanted to, because she doesn’t have a working electric wheelchair.
Then, Victoria took a phone call, in which this happened, live on air:
UPDATE: viewer John Bull was watching Anastasia talking about her loneliness and the fact that her electric wheelchair had broken – and has offered a brand new one to her ! https://t.co/rldXL0eZhw
— Victoria Derbyshire (@vicderbyshire) May 4, 2020
And then Victoria wondered how to get the chair to Anastasia, and this happened:
UPDATE 2: and viewer Spencer Newton has offered to pick it up in Southampton and deliver it to Anastasia in London
— Victoria Derbyshire (@vicderbyshire) May 4, 2020
Victoria’s viewers really are a lovely lot. What a heartwarming story of the kindness of strangers! I have been reminded for the millionth time why I love the programme and it’s presenter so very much.
It was created at The Old Rectory in Winterton-on Sea, Norfolk, which supports people with learning disabilities.
Contents includes a note on residents’ feelings, and crafts that have been designed while in lockdown.
It was buried last week in the hope someone would find it in the future.
The Old Rectory is home to seven residents, and support worker Taylor Goodrum said the idea came about as “an opportunity to open a conversation up about it so they could have all their questions answered” about the current crisis.
Through the project, Miss Goodrum said the staff and residents were able to speak about “what things we could do that they like doing that could make it more bearable for them”.
The group then dug a hole in the garden and placed the time capsule inside.
Miss Goodrum said: “We’ve put on there we’d like to know when it’s been dug up and who’s dug it up; whether they found it interesting and whether that far in the future coronavirus is still talked about.”
One of the residents, Paul, said he had been “finding the lockdown quite hard” and that “everything about my usual routine is changing”.
But he added: “I’m really happy to have the support of my support workers and we’ve been doing so many fun activities.”
Edel Harris, chief executive of Mencap, the learning disability charity that runs the home, said support workers “are going above and beyond to create a sense of normality and community”.
She added: “In some cases, they are the only contact some people have.
“They must be recognised on par with healthcare workers for their extraordinary response to this crisis – including being paid in line with NHS staff to demonstrate that society values the incredible work they do every day.”
Seven weeks in and she’s finding her joints and mental health are suffering from the lack of movement due to isolating.
Kate’s wife Holly is on immunosuppressants and shielding for 12 weeks, but, together as a family, they make the decision to finally go for a social distanced walk. Was it the right choice?
Produced by Amy Elizabeth – email amy.elizabeth@bbc.co.uk to get a message to Kate and Holly.
Subscribe to this podcast on BBC Sounds or say “Ask the BBC for Ouch” to your smart speaker.
Same Difference has been asked to publicise the below by an old friend of the site. You can contact her here if you wish to participate.
My name is Sapna Ramnani and I am a documentary maker. While in lockdown during the coronavirus epidemic, I will be making a documentary to explore the personal stories of people from all over the world who are now in social isolation.
Having completed a PhD in January of this year, I am both a scholar and an independent documentary film-maker with Cerebral Palsy that affects my motor functions including my speech.
I would like to hear from you if you are willing to share your personal stories of what social isolation means for you, your family and friends. What does it mean for you when you are suddenly not able to go about your daily business and being unable to see your family, friends and the rest of society? How are you coping with daily life and not being able to do the things you want to? How has social isolation impacted on your mental and physical well-being?
Your stories will be included in a documentary which I will be making over the next few weeks, if you are interested in participating, then please read on.
“Lockdown” Summary of Documentary
Governments in almost every country are responding to the outbreak of highly contagious coronavirus by instructing people to stay at home and not to meet up in person with friends, family and work colleagues. This limits transmission so health services do not become overwhelmed and also prevents many deaths.
It is also, for most, a new way of living our lives with severe restrictions on what we can do. What have you not being able to do since the lockdown that you did previously? Are there things you have been able to do now as a result of the lockdown? How does this way of living impact on your physical and mental well-being? What, if anything, have we learnt about ourselves and is our outlook on the world any different? The documentary will explore your perspective on questions like these by giving you an opportunity to explain lockdown from your perspective.
This documentary will be a combination of personal home movies and interviews that I will conduct online where I will investigate the thoughts, opinions and lifestyle adjustments individuals have had to make to adapt to social isolation.
People from all over the world are welcome to contribute their stories and opinions, which will provide a global yet personal perspective.
Personally, being unable to see my friends has been hard to adapt to.
I will conduct a series of conversational interviews where people will be encouraged to talk about life under lockdown. This, combined with any home movies will be edited into a documentary. For those interviewees who wish to be included but want their identities to be hidden, I will use a voice over to disguise their voices and protect their anonymity.
Whatever your perspective and whatever your personal story of how you have been coping with the lockdown, I would like to hear from you.
In March, 10 members of staff moved into The White House in Teignmouth, Devon, where they care for people with dementia.
They are sleeping in a campervan and the staff offices to ensure the 17 residents are “kept safe”.
Manager Demelza Lamport said since moving in “we have established better relationships with the residents”.
She said the staff have “settled in really well”.
Finance and office manager Rebekah Hayden said: “We made the decision because we thought it was going to be the only way to keep them safe.
“It’s had a positive effect on the residents – seeing the same faces all the time.
“It wasn’t a difficult decision because I am one of the team, but I talk to my son and parents every day – I miss him and he misses me.”
She has been working in the kitchen to release other staff members who can work as carers.
“My office is now a bedroom for three of us. I moved everything around and turned it into three separate cubicles so we’ve got as much privacy as possible,” she said.
Katie Smith, a care assistant, said the decision to move in “keeps the residents safe and my family safe”.
“I’ve only been here for two months so it was a massive change. I’m getting to know the staff and residents better, like a family.”
The staff unable to stay with the residents have been working at The White House’s sister care home.
The National Care Association said what staff members were doing was “most admirable”.
A century ago blind and partially sighted people marched on London to lobby the government to improve their living and working conditions. The 1920 Blind March has become a milestone in the history of the disability rights movement. But as recreating a large gathering is not possible in current circumstances, blind people are using their daily personal exercise to mark the anniversary.
Sixteen years before the historic Jarrow Crusade, a less well-known but perhaps even more remarkable trade union march arrived in London to demand action to end poverty.
Carrying banners with slogans such as “Social justice not charity”, the protesters had travelled hundreds of miles to demand state aid, for those who like themselves were blind or visually impaired.
Over the previous three weeks the 250 marchers had promoted their cause to the wider public at large meetings in towns and cities along the way.
They sought government intervention to ensure that blind people were not condemned to poverty because of their impairment.
On their arrival in London on 25 April 1920, they were greeted at a rally in Trafalgar Square attended by 10,000 people.
Five days later a delegation was invited to Downing Street to put their case in person to the Prime Minister David Lloyd George.
While the march did not achieve all its aims, it increased pressure on the Liberal-Conservative coalition government to get the much-delayed Blind Persons Act onto the statute book.
This landmark legislation passed in September 1920, placed a duty on local authorities to “promote the welfare of blind persons”.
A century on the Royal National Institute of Blind People (RNIB), is seeking to commemorate the anniversary of the march, and is urging blind people to mark the occasion by articulating what they believe still needs to be done to achieve equality.
The march was organised by the National League of the Blind [(NLB)], a trade union founded in 1899 by blind and partially-sighted workers to represent their own interests.
The RNIB’s Director of Development Keith Valentine says: “The march is symbolic of what’s possible if you take the action yourself. It’s the sense of ‘this is not fair, and I will not be pushed around, and I am a citizen of this country.'”
Harsh charity
Historian Francis Salt says that in the years prior to the march the NLB had unsuccessfully campaigned for action to improve the lives of blind people, many of whom depended on employment in workshops, run by charities where conditions were often poor and wages low.
“The match was a culmination of their frustration that nobody seemed to be taking any notice,” says Salt, who is himself blind.
The charities exercised significant control over their workforce. In some cases, employees had to seek permission from their bosses to marry.
Francis Salt recalls how his own blind grandfather was employed as a brush maker at a workshop in Manchester.
“My mother told me that my granddad used to come home with tar all over his fingers,” he says. “And if you consider these men that we’re talking about in 1920, their main way of reading was by Braille, then the last thing they wanted was their fingers being burned every day.”
The low wages paid by the workshops left many struggling to get by.
One of the leading figures behind the march, NLB official David Lawley, a former miner who was blinded by a dynamite explosion in 1913, wrote: “Of 35,000 blind people in the country 20,000 were existing below the poverty line. There were 850 beggars on the streets of London and 200 at Manchester.
“The blind have lost faith in charitable institutions being able to promote their welfare, and what they wanted was state aid to make the unfortunate class, to which they belonged, as self supporting as possible.”
By comparison, the NHS says that today there are almost 2 million people living with sight loss. Of these, around 360,000 are registered as blind or partially sighted.
‘The bigger the better’
Efforts to introduce legislation to improve life for the blind people had stalled, even after some soldiers lost their sight in World War One.
The league resolved to do something that would make an impact.
“Let us go to London, and the bigger we do things the better,” the movement’s journal, the Blind Advocate proclaimed in February 1920, as plans for the march were formed.
On Easter Monday marchers from all over the UK set off in three groups from Manchester, Leeds and Newport. Although the workshops employed both sexes, it was decided that only men should march as conditions were expected to be quite basic.
A policy decision was also taken that blind soldiers should not go. The union did not want to play on patriotic sentiment in its efforts to raise public awareness of the plight of the blind Francis Salt says.
“They didn’t want sympathy. They wanted understanding,” he says.
One challenge that had to be overcome was finding a way for columns of blind men to safely travel through the country on foot, in an era before the use of guide dogs.
Salt says: “Some had a rope running through the centre with two men linking arms on either side and a sighted guide in front, whilst another group preferred to link arms four abreast following the guides.
“Whistles and shouted commands were used to direct and keep the marchers safe when mixing with other road transport and the local police escorted the march from town boundary to town boundary.”
It must have been an extraordinary logistical feat to pull off. And the sight of the marchers was according to contemporary accounts enough to move some women at the roadside to tears, says Francis Salt.
But he notes that the march was also not without its humorous moments: “They weren’t opposed to cadging a lift. From Stafford to Stone they got the train because it was pouring down. In another place the city fathers sent a fleet of buses out for them, so they could get to the meeting on time.”
At night, the marchers often stayed at the homes of supporters, and on occasion some were put up in police cells.
Downing Street meeting
Eventually the three groups joined up at Leicester for the final stages.
On arrival in the capital, the marchers spent several days waiting for their “interview” with the prime minister. During that time some of the men were invited to tea at the House of Commons by Lady Astor, only the second woman to be elected an MP.
The meeting with Lloyd George, when it came would prove to “disappointing” says Francis Salt.
The NLB’s leadership pressed for “a compensation for blindness grant” to ensure that the blind did not have to live on less the sighted. They also wanted the state to guarantee better education and employment opportunities.
Francis Salt says they also feared that the proposed Blind Persons bill, as drafted, would allow local authorities to sub-contract the duties the legislation placed on them to the very charities the NLB opposed.
Lloyd George responded that he would look at their demands sympathetically. But he stressed that the war had increased the national debt and “our taxes are about the heaviest in the world”.
The only firm commitments given were that the government would provide rail tickets, so the marchers did not have to walk home, and a promise that none of the men would face reprisals from their employers for going on the march.
After leaving the meeting, the NLB passed a resolution recording their dissatisfaction with Lloyd George.
“Such phrases as he employed do not lead us to anticipate that drastic changes are about to be made in the condition of the Blind and such a circumstance is in itself wholly unsatisfactory,” it noted.
Despite this disappointment, the bill that the march helped to bring about was the world’s first disability-specific legislation. Among the advances it contained was a lowering of the age at which [the blind people received their pension from 70 to 50.
Socially-distanced solidarity
A century on the march is regarded as a disability rights milestone.
To mark the anniversary the RNIB is urging blind and partially sighted people to use their daily exercise to take their own symbolic steps for equality. Some campaigners have responded by posting videos with the hashtag #BlindMarch reflecting on the march and life today.
Several of their contributions have been collected by the RNIB in a video which mixes archive footage of the 1920 marchers with their counterparts of today.
Among those featured is Holly Tuke, author of the blog Life of a Blind Girl, who said: “There have been many positive changes that have had a significant impact on the lives of blind and partially sighted people over the last 100 years, however we still have a long way to go to achieve equality.
“Over the next 100 years I’d like people to see our ability, not just our disability.”
For historian Francis Salt, the lockdown has removed a more literal obstacle that has prevented him living as he would like.
“The biggest hinderance to blind people like myself – who is very independent and got a guide dog – is people parking on the pavement. That’s the biggest threat to my wellbeing that I meet on a daily basis. And believe it or not in the last five weeks I’ve not had one incident, because they have all stayed at home!”
Diagnosed with borderline personality disorder, she believes she suppressed the grief she felt for three friends who died suddenly when she was a child.
It caught up with her years later when she was working as a nurse – she stopped sleeping, eating, started to self -harm, and had suicidal thoughts.
She spent nearly 10 years in acute mental health units and a therapeutic community. At times she felt she’d lost everything but Hannah always knew she wanted to return to nursing.
Twelve years on she has successfully returned to work as a hospice nurse. But no one could have predicted her first day would be the day the World Health Organisation declared Covid-19 a global pandemic.
It’s not just caring that Hannah has a talent for, as a keen embroiderer she also got a call-up to work on the Duchess of Cambridge’s wedding dress. But when she revealed to a nurse what she’d been doing, they presumed she was delusional!
Hannah speaks openly about the past 12 years and as such topics such as self-harm and suicide arise.
Her wife Holly is on immunosuppressants and has to shield for 12 weeks but is now going stir-crazy while Scout is becoming clingy and eating significantly less since lockdown started.
Kate weighs up all their mental and physical needs.
Her publicist Liz Dixson confirmed the news in a statement published on Ross’s Instagram account.
The statement, issued “with profound sadness”, said Ross “had succumbed to injuries from a tragic hit-and-run car accident”.
The show, which airs on the Lifetime channel in the UK, follows the lives of a group of women with dwarfism.
The reality show is based in Atlanta, Georgia, in the US.
The statement continued: “The family respectfully asks for their privacy as they grieve during this very difficult time.”
No holds barred
The sixth series of Little Women: Atlanta is set to air later this year and it’s believed filming has already been completed. Ross had been a part of the show since it began in 2016.
It was a spin-off of Little Women: LA and like the original, is full of real-life drama as the women navigate their way through life’s challenges – there’s boyfriend issues, pregnancies, tears, tantrums, you name it.
The women have even delved into the world of hip hop – well, it is Atlanta.
But it also has a serious side, showing the difficulties of having dwarfism.
In an interview with Madamenoire, Ross said she joined the show because she “wanted to be part of this movement because I want everyone to see our point of view in life. I want people to, you know, see what we go through. The everyday struggle that little people go through in life. When people say the struggle is real? It’s real. We go through hell and back.”
In one famously feisty episode in series one, Ross said of fellow star Shirlene Pearson, aka Miss Juicy: “She look like somebody grandma, I look like somebody daughter or sister.”
British Sign Language (BSL) users say they have been discriminated against because critical information is not conveyed to them.
A Twitter campaign which started as #WhereIsTheInterpreter? has now morphed into a class action legal case.
Number 10 said the BBC had agreed to use interpreters on the News Channel.
The daily press briefings, which often occur at 17:00 BST, provide the latest information from the UK government in relation to the Covid-19 pandemic.
Lynn Stewart-Taylor first tweeted #WhereIsTheInterpreter? on 9 March when she watched one of the briefings and found there was no interpreter, even though she could sense “critical information” was being given.
She said the lack of a BSL interpreter “made me feel very panicked and worried”.
While some may suggest deaf people could read subtitles during TV briefings, BSL and English are distinct languages.
Stewart-Taylor classes BSL as her first language and although she was taught to speak English at school she has an “average reading age of seven years old”.
She says: “Trying to decipher the information [from subtitles] is like trying to work out something written in a foreign language.”
Legal firm, Fry Law has started judicial review proceedings – where a judge considers the lawfulness of a decision or action by a public body.
It claims the lack of interpreters breaches the Equality Act 2010 which states that discrimination or unfair treatment on the basis of certain characteristics – such as being deaf – is against the law.
Pursuing the judicial review, however, is reliant on the campaigners raising £15,000 through crowdfunding by 6 May, to ensure that if they lose they can cover the government’s legal fees.
Chris Fry, from the legal firm, says: “It’s just disappointing they’re [the government] doing the bare minimum.”
He argues, that says even though interpreters are available on the BBC News Channel for some briefings, when clips are later replayed they do not feature an interpreter. It also puts the onus on the deaf person to seek out the News Channel when the information is of national importance.
In a statement, Downing Street said: “We have established British Sign Language (BSL) interpretation at the daily No. 10 press conference via the BBC News Channel and iPlayer…and are working to ensure greater replication of this signed interpretation across a wider range of media channels.”
In Scotland, interpreters stand 2m behind the minister during briefings because BSL is formally recognised as a language. Wales too has opted to provide interpreters on stage, even though BSL is not formally recognised there, while Northern Ireland relies on BBC inserts for its briefings.
Tobias Weller, from Sheffield, uses a walking frame and was only managing about 50m a day before lockdown began.
He had planned to walk 1km in his local park to raise money for charity, but is now walking 750m daily until he has completed the 26 mile (42km) challenge.
Tobias said he heard about Captain Tom and wants to raise £10,000 by doing this “ginormous” challenge.
He has raised more than £8,000 so far for his two favourite charities, Sheffield Children’s Hospital and Paces School, which he attends.
His mother Ruth Garbutt said: “He wanted to complete the sponsored walk in May and was disappointed he couldn’t do it.
“When he heard about Captain Tom’s challenge, he kind of saw the similarities and decided to replace his sponsored walk with a marathon attempt.
“We started on 21 March, which is pretty much when we started in lockdown, and we think we will be finished towards the end of May.
“He is very, very motivated to do it every single day which is fantastic.”
She added it was good physiotherapy for him, as he was missing the daily physiotherapy he usually received at Paces School.
‘Determined to do it’
Paces is a school for conductive education where the emphasis is on developing the children so they can achieve as much independence as possible. They follow physiotherapy programmes throughout the day as well as being educated at the same time.
She said it was “crazy” seeing the amount of donations rising. “As we see it smashing each thousand pound barrier, Tobias is just thrilled about it”.
Tobias, who also has autism and cannot stand or walk unaided, said: “It’s brilliant, we have loads of lovely neighbours who I have got to know loads better during lockdown.
In a video posted on his Just Giving Page he said: “This is going to be a ginormous challenge for me. A marathon is 42,000m but I am determined to do it.
“At the start of lockdown, I would use my crocodile walker to walk 50m a day, but now I am walking 750m a day”.
Tobias wants to raise money towards their new fundraising campaign “A New Home for Paces” to provide a new school with improved facilities.
Paces Sheffield is a specialist centre, school and charity for children and adults with cerebral palsy and other motor disorders of a neurological origin.
The tribunals service have issued new guidelines which say that PIP claimants who have had their PIP award removed can be considered for ‘urgent’ hearings.
The guidelines, dated 15 April 2020, say that the most urgent hearings are for claimants who have no benefit in payment at all.
According to the Tribunals Service:
“This will have arisen from Universal Credit and Jobseeker Allowance sanctions and failure to attend a medical assessment when benefit is stopped for a period and can have immediate knock-on effects in relation to Housing Benefit leading to repossession of the home.
The guidelines go on to say that the next most urgent cases are in relation to PIP, where benefit was in payment but has been removed, usually because of a revision or supersession.
“Particular urgency arises when appellants, who may already have severe illness, including severe mental illness, realise that their appeal may not go ahead as planned because of the restrictions in face to face hearings that are not remote.”
If you have had your PIP taken away from you and you are waiting for an appeal date, you can contact the Tribunals Service and ask for an urgent hearing, giving your reasons.
A judge sitting alone will consider the issue, just on the papers.
The judge has the power to make an immediate decision completely in your favour. Alternatively the judge can arrange for a telephone hearing of your case.
We are hearing from an increasing number of members who have missed their PIP telephone assessment because they block calls where the caller hides their ID.
Most health professionals carrying out telephone assessments are working from home and using their own telephone, so they are hiding their number from claimants.
However, many people have set up their phones so that they either do not accept calls where the caller’s number is hidden, or the call goes straight through to their answering service.
The result is that the health professional calls the claimant, can’t speak to them and hands the issue back to the assessment provider, IAS or Capita.
IAS or Capita will either then contact the claimant to try to rearrange the appointment and ensure that calls are not blocked or, in the worst cases, gives the case back to the DWP on the grounds that the claimant failed to attend their telephone assessment.
So, if you are due a telephone assessment, please make sure that callers who have hidden their number can still get through to you.
For most people the Covid-19 crisis is an unsettling, confusing time. But for hundreds of thousands of adults with autism in the UK the problems are acute.
Families and charities say this vulnerable group has been forgotten in the pandemic and they are often not receiving the care they need. Here some of them describe what things have been like since the lockdown began.
‘Sick with worry’
In a few weeks Simon will be 53. He was diagnosed with autism when he was three and has been in residential care his whole life.
He has very limited communication but can say when he wants a cup of tea. In normal times, he would go riding and swimming once a week.
“He’s a very active young man,” says his mother Andrea. “And to me he’s still a young man.”
But two weeks ago Simon fell ill, with a high temperature and severe cough.
“I just felt sick with worry,” Andrea says. “I mean what’s going to happen to him if he is so ill he has to go into hospital?”
Despite having typical symptoms, like thousands of others, Simon has not been tested for coronavirus and Andrea is not allowed to see him.
She has nothing but praise for the care home staff but says: “No doctors will come and that is the whole problem. We don’t know what we are dealing with.
“It’s been terrible – probably the most stressful week in my life.”
Simon has no way of communicating how he’s feeling, whether he’s getting better or worse, and no way of processing what is happening to him.
“I can’t imagine what he’s thinking,” Andrea says.
“Even his favourite cup of tea has disappeared because they are giving him cold drinks to keep his temperature down. He can’t even say to someone, I’d really love to have a cup of tea.”
Under NHS guidelines if someone with autism or a learning disability does need hospital treatment for Covid-19 then a single family member or carer can visit.
But Andrea still thinks Simon would struggle to cope.
“He would be absolutely terrified,” she says. “Most hospitals have very, very limited staff who can deal with autism and learning disabilities. I just don’t know what would happen.”
She says Simon’s condition has started to improve and he is now eating small amounts and sitting in the garden with a drink.
‘What protection do I have?’
David* was diagnosed with autism and multiple learning disabilities as a child. Now in his 50s, he’s spent the last 30 years living in three different residential care homes.
He is worried about what will happen if the virus spreads in the home and says people like him have been forgotten.
“Testing should be done daily on residents and care workers,” he says.
“If my care workers get it or other residents get it, I’m stuck. What protection do I have? I am concerned about the lack of PPE for all care providers not just my own.”
Like many people with autism, Christopher finds it hard to handle the unpredictable.
“He gets very confused, very frustrated, with any form of change to his timetable or his daily routines,” says his mother Jane. “So when situations like this arise you get a lot of anxiety from him.”
Christopher lives on his own, in his own house. He has two long-term carers who help with meals, cleaning, personal care and other everyday tasks he can’t do alone, but last month they both had to resign – one for health reasons, the other to look after their own children – leaving him with no support.
And because Jane lives with another vulnerable person, lockdown means she isn’t able to help her son face-to-face.
“Everything has to be done within his drive, keeping the two metre distance,” she says. “But that means we can’t provide the personal care he desperately, desperately needs.”
If – as seems likely – the lockdown continues for weeks, perhaps months, Jane fears it could be “catastrophic” for her son.
“The longer this goes on, the more anxious he’s becoming, the more unconfident he’s becoming, the more he’s losing what we’ve built up with him over the years.
“He’s a 40-year-old young man who has lots to give. He’s an absolute treasure, but I’m so worried about this time for him.”
‘I’m afraid he’ll lose his social skills’
Living in supported accommodation, James* has been used to receiving regular visits from his care workers.
But since the coronavirus outbreak his contact has been limited to brief phone calls or a knock at the door.
He has Asperger Syndrome and has recently been discharged from hospital where he was a patient for over 10 years.
“Gradually he’s staying in more, not seeing or speaking to anyone, staying up all night and in bed for a huge part of the day,” says his mother Kathy.
“I’m afraid that he’s going to lose all his social skills again and get very depressed, ending up back in hospital.”
Because of her age, Kathy is having to self-isolate so can only contact her son by email or video call.
“He keeps saying ‘what’s the point of living if we’re in lockdown’.
“He’s relying more and more on me for mental support rather than turning to his team. So I’m on the receiving end of the brunt of his frustrations. I’ll be very glad when the lockdown is over and he can get the full support he needs.”
Jane Harris, Director of External Affairs at the National Autistic Society, says “Autistic people often have communication difficulties. That means that it’s harder to understand what is going on in the first place.
“But also autistic people don’t often have the best support networks to start with so it’s really, really hard for them to get support in a crisis, things like shopping or even just a phone call just to check that somebody is okay.
“There will be thousands of people across the country who are deeply isolated during this crisis and who need support more than ever.”
The charity has published guidance for autistic people and their families to help during the pandemic. For more information on organisations that can help visit BBC Action Line.
At the time, doctors told him he had just “one or two” years left to live.
Four years have passed since his diagnosis, and he is now unable to move his limbs or breathe without a ventilator.
But he has refused to let the disease break his spirit, and last year managed to smash two Guinness World Records for running marathons in his wheelchair.
Phil says that it has become difficult to keep track of how far his disease has progressed: “I don’t notice day-to-day changes, but then looking back to the start of this year is a scary experience for me,” he told the BBC.
MND is a degenerative and often fast-progressing disease. Due to its nature, those with the condition have a heightened risk of complications if they catch a respiratory infection like Covid-19.
Phil and his partner, Brenda, have been self-isolating for the last month.
“The enforced isolation has meant that my blog and book have been the main respite from a world of hoists, wheelchairs and face masks,” he said.
“My speech is now completely incomprehensible, so writing is now my only form of communication with the outside world. I miss my St Christopher’s carers and the MND Association visitors, but my heart goes out to people who are desperately ill and who feel deserted by their own government.”
‘Mixed messages’
Despite relying on a ventilator to breathe, Phil was not initially included in the government’s list of who should be shielding. He says that the government’s advice since the coronavirus outbreak began has felt like a succession of “mixed messages” that left him and his partner unsure of his situation.
“I have two postgraduate degrees and have worked as a research manager, and yet I have been very confused,” he said. “Seeing that I have a debilitating condition and that I am reliant on ventilation 24/7, I was expecting to be included, but instead I was not in the 1.5 million most vulnerable in the country. All I can say is that there must be an awful lot of very sick people out there.”
While the disease is on the NHS England list of underlying health conditions, it has yet to be explicitly named on the list of those who should be “shielding”.
The advice on whether MND patients should be on the shielding list has said it depends on the stage of their illness.
The MND Association, a charity dedicated to the care and protection of those living with the disease, told the BBC it had been inundated with concerned and upset patients and families.
“Many are terrified of catching coronavirus, knowing the implications for them could be catastrophic,” said head of policy and campaigns, Susie Rabin.
She said more than 3,500 of the charity’s supporters had emailed their MPs urging them to ask Health Secretary Matt Hancock to add MND to the “extremely vulnerable” list.
“Not being automatically added to the extremely clinically vulnerable shielding and protecting list, means that people are struggling to get food and essential medicines delivered, particularly if they live alone.
“People with MND have died of Covid 19 already. We’d like all people with MND shielded and protected from this disease.
“We believe that inclusion on the ‘extremely vulnerable’ list is the safest and most appropriate option for people with MND.
“There needs to be more support for social care workers and much more adequate provision of PPE for carers both in care homes and in domestic settings to enable them to support and care for disabled people.”
‘Vital service’
As his primary carer, Phil’s partner is unable to leave him alone in the house. Because of this, the couple have come to rely on a delivery service from their local supermarket over the last three years.
However, due to not being classed as “extremely vulnerable” by the government, the couple were told that they were not eligible for a delivery slot.
“The fact remains that I was receiving a vital service until the ‘extremely vulnerable’ rules came in. Whether the omission of MND from the official shielding list was a result of incompetence, ignorance or prejudice, doesn’t matter to me.
“I will not go hungry. But for the first time in my life, I feel I am a victim of discrimination. I never get angry. I may be wrong, but I feel like I don’t count, that I belong to a group that’s not worth bothering about because we’ll be dead soon anyway.”
He felt forced to take matters into his own hands, and only after he had asked his consultant to send a supporting letter to his GP, did he finally receive the phone call to tell him he had been placed on the list.
Case-by-case basis
A spokesman for the Department of Health and Social Care told the BBC that patients with MND are being assessed on an individual basis.
“Expert doctors have identified specific medical conditions that put someone at greatest risk of severe illness from Covid-19, meaning they’re clinically extremely vulnerable and need to shield.
“The list will continue to be reviewed, and doctors are identifying additional people who need to shield depending on their individual circumstances.”
Those who are not classified as “extremely vulnerable”, but have underlying health conditions, are still advised to adhere to stay-at-home guidelines, he added.
Despite his victory, Phil says he’s concerned that others like him may not be so lucky.
“I am still concerned that other people with this terrible disease do not have the support I have.”
He added: “I am still angry that the government advisers forgot some of the most vulnerable people in the country and ignored our pleas for so long. Surely it shouldn’t be so hard.”
Justin Tomlinson, minister for disabled people, confirmed yesterday that PIP claimants have a right to have someone else take part in their PIP telephone assessment. This is in spite of some Benefits and Work members being told that no-one else could help them give evidence.
Tomlinson told the work and pensions committee on 23 April, 2020:
“If you are having a telephone assessment, we are allowing your friend, family, trusted partner to be part of that process which is something we introduced a few years ago for face-to-face assessments which has made a huge difference to the quality of the outcome of the assessments.”
Yet, we have heard from members who have not been told that someone else can be involved or have even been refused permission to have someone else take part:
“My partner has a telephone assessment on Thursday. Told him it could last for I hour .He has copd and heart problems. I asked could I speak for him as he gets very breathless they said no he has to speak himself.”
We will be updating our PIP claims guide to include this quote from the minister.
With coronavirus making going to the cinema, a gig or the theatre a distant memory, there is one area of culture that is more accessible than ever: television. Live viewing has soared by 17% since the lockdown began, with the BBC and Channel 4 reporting huge increases in ratings. In March, ITV recorded its highest ever numbers for an entertainment show, when 11 million tuned into Ant and Dec’s first Saturday Night Takeaway without a studio audience.
But while most people are tuning into more shows than ever, millions around the world are still struggling to access them – including those with visual impairments. This frustration is felt by many, not least blind viewers in Wales, who were reported in February to be feeling like “second-class citizens” over the lack of audio-described original programming in the country.
Robert Kingett is a Chicago-based journalist who has been blind since childhood due to retinopathy of prematurity. As well as consuming fiction podcasts and audiobooks, he is an avid TV-watcher. However, the audio description he relies on to fully understand shows is often frustratingly irregular, depending on the channel or the streaming service. “Very little gets reported on in terms of the state and history of these accessibility matters,” he says, despite the fact that they could have benefits for sighted audiences, too. “You can listen to a movie while driving. You can listen to a movie at the gym or when you have eye fatigue, or if you don’t like reading subtitles.”
Sonali Rai is the audio description manager at the Royal National Institute of Blind People. She outlines how awareness has improved over the past decade. “After an RNIB campaign in 2010, BBC, Channel 4, Sky and ITV made a public commitment to broadcast a minimum of 20% of their programming with audio description, with the others still required to do at least 10%,” she explains. “However, if you look at the latest Ofcom access services report, most broadcasters seem to be achieving more than the legal requirement.”
Despite this, she says that online catchup and streaming services need to make serious improvements. “Some are performing really well, but most are still trying to find a way to standardise the delivery of the audio-description tracks on their apps across different platforms. We would like to see content providers consider accessibility when they start designing their services, so they are not trying to retrofit it later.”
Take Netflix, for example. The streaming giant offers more than 500 audio-described series and films – including original content such as House of Cards – although it can often seem that there is no consistency to its approach, as became clear when the fifth series of Black Mirror was released. “When it dropped, there was no audio description,” says Kingett. “There are no regulations that say streaming companies have to be accessible – there’s no standard, so things are nowhere near as organised or even reliable.”
It is not just providing audio description that is the issue, however. Often the hardware itself can prove prohibitive. Despite devices such as the latest Sky remote control, which allows for full voice control, there are still limitations, such as unreadable electronic programme guides. One deep frustration is that the level of care and attention given to the technology varies wildly between streaming services. Kingett speaks highly of Microsoft and Apple’s accessibility policies, but they are exceptions rather than the rule. “Apple made its entire Apple TV+ platform accessible – and no other company has audio description in multiple languages.”
Craig Reekie, 34, lives in Glasgow. He started to lose his sight a few years ago and finds voice remotes particularly beneficial. “With Amazon Prime Video [unlike many other services], you can adjust the subtitles so they’re really large or in inverted colours,” he says.
For Reekie, there is a catalogue of seemingly small things that could be solved with even cursory attention. Audio description has improved, he says, but it is still laughably spotty. “I have to ask my girlfriend what happened in the epilogue on First Dates, when there could be a voiceover.” For many, it can also be an alienating experience, and means being excluded from the everyday cultural conversations that form the backdrop to our lives. “I also think blind people are missing out on so many foreign films or TV shows that could easily be dubbed,” he adds.
The greatest irony Kingett has encountered was with Daredevil, the Netflix show about the blind Marvel superhero, which was released without audio description. There was also some confusion around the first season of the CW’s 2019 dramedy In the Dark, in which the blind lead character is played by the sighted actor Perry Mattfeld. The show’s network is not mandated to provide audio description, which led to viewers taking to Twitter wondering if the show would be accessible at all, despite its visually impaired characters. In the end, it was, although some asked why accessibility measures had been slipped in almost as an afterthought.
On-screen representation is one thing, but it is not just inadequate hardware or poor audio description that cause difficulties for the partially sighted viewer. The past few years have witnessed the rise of the silent episode. Shows as diverse as BoJack Horseman and Mr Robot have made use of silence as a means of pushing TV boundaries, even if it presents a new barrier for visually impaired viewers. Audio description is a more ambiguous benefit in this instance, even if it were to be attempted. Would audio description applied to these episodes render them more audiobook than TV? Are more inventive approaches needed when the content is more experimental?
Perhaps one of the answers is for programme-makers to start considering visual accessibility as a question of form, as well as presentation. Kingett described Apple TV+’s recent extinction parable, See, as that rarest of things – and hopefully a portent of a more accessible future – a show that gives the sighted a taste of what it feels like not to be the priority.
This is unlike the less technically ambitious Daredevil or In the Dark, which, despite their blind protagonists, don’t go as far as they might have. See takes it that bit further, with its use of blind actors and the hiring of a “blind consultant”, Joe Strechay, as well as the inclusion of a host of disabled actors and crew. The on-screen characters use braille and there is crystal-clear use of audio description. “For once, it’s the sighted population who need the world-building so they can put things together, but we get the gist of things right away,” says Kingett. “I love how blind people just live, love, kill and thrive in this world without adapting to it.”
A trip to McDonald’s or the local pub had not only become a treat, but a key part of a settled weekly routine.
However, the coronavirus outbreak has taken away those routines, causing distress and anxiety for many.
So staff at an autism centre in south Wales have come up with ideas to help maintain structure, including a replica drive-through burger restaurant.
Support workers at Glamorgan House in Neath were eager to help those with autism get through the restrictions.
With the help of a local McDonald’s restaurant that was closed during the lockdown, staff sourced packaging and cups for an authentic experience as well as making their own uniforms by hand.
“As soon as we began serving up meals there were smiling faces all around and orders were flying in,” said senior support worker Abbie Williams.
It is reassuring for the parents of the 20 people who normally use Glamorgan House every day, including Catherine Russell, of Cardiff, whose son Matthew, 41, has been visiting the centre since it opened in 2004.
“Matthew likes to go to McDonald’s and also the pub for his tea once a week but he’s not able to do those things anymore,” she said.
“It’s difficult because he really needs to have his routines and keep to the same things. So it’s lovely that the staff are doing this under really difficult circumstances.
“It’s amazing they’re keeping them happy and are able to continue their routines, even when everything is changing. Matthew is really enjoying it.”
The burger bar drive-through is just the latest idea from the staff, which have already included an ice-cream parlour and pick ‘n’ mix sweet stand.
Glamorgan House offers help and support to autistic people as well as providing a place to socialise and and study in an environment similar to a college.
The National Autistic Society (NAS) said changes to routine, the sensory challenges of increased handwashing and the general anxiety of the pandemic can have a significant effect on those with autism.
“Many of the autistic people we support can feel anxiety about change or unexpected events and that is particularly the case at the moment,” said Nick Haake, of NAS Cymru.
“The staff cross all of our services have been amazing during this difficult period and have taken extraordinary steps to limit the impact that unexpected changes are having on the people they are supporting.”
He reveals what it’s like to be deaf at a time when everyone is social-distancing and where mouths are covered by masks, making lip-reading impossible. The writer and journalist also talks about the hashtag #WhereIsTheInterpreter which raised awareness of the fact sign language interpreters do not appear at the daily British government briefings. The hashtag has now morphed into a crowdfunding project to take the government to court using equality laws but Number 10 says it provides signers via the BBC News Channel.
Beyond politics we head to soap land to get the scoop on Charlie’s TV projects and, if you’re thinking of giving writing a try, he has some top tips to get you started and keep you going.
People who have suffered a brain injury are often already in a position where they don’t have access to specialist rehabilitation at the time they need it, particularly when they live in a rural area.
In the countryside, it can take far longer to reach a hospital, whether this in an emergency or for a planned appointment, and community based clinics are few and far between. Those who are unable to drive are often entirely reliant upon the goodwill of others to help them attend appointments, or face having to pay for taxis for long trips. Public transport is irregular at best and often not an option for someone recovering from a brain injury.
The restrictions put in place because of the COVID-19 virus are making an already difficult situation worse. I’m hearing of setbacks being faced by our clients and those in charity groups that I support, often because they are no longer able to receive the therapies they need. This is also because people are no longer able to participate in activities, or see their family or friends. We are all working hard to find ways around problems where possible. Specialist brain injury charities such as The Silverliningand Headwayare offering helpful resources, support and activities, by telephone and by video.
In rural areas, where people live some distance apart from others, they are already isolated. Specialist community brain injury support services are more stretched than in city or suburban areas, even in usual times. Each nurse or therapist is able to see fewer patients each day because of the time it takes to travel between their homes. For this reason, any further barrier to a service being provided will affect those in the countryside more acutely, unless those services are ring-fenced and prioritised.
Professionals are of course often attending to a number of different patients, and are vulnerable to becoming unwell with the virus themselves. Support workers being off sick mean that there are fewer brain injury specialist support workers available to provide care required. An agency support worker may be able to provide cover, however this means that an unfamiliar person is introduced to provide care, which can in itself be disruptive and stressful. They may also not be a specialist.
Where someone with a brain injury has family members available, it will inevitably fall to them to provide more help than usual. This can put a strain on relationships, where – whilst they are more than happy to help – they have to inevitably change their role to be that of a carer. This will have an impact, and where this involves intimate care, such as helping people wash or go to the toilet, may cause embarrassment or upset.
Potentially the most vulnerable are those with a brain injury who are isolated in a rural area, unable to travel and on their own, without family to help. They are entirely reliant upon professional carers coming in to help them at home, often to help them with mobility and to get up and around, and to make sure they have enough food and provisions. Those visits are literally a lifeline. If anything disrupts that service, it can have devastating consequences. Carers may be the only other faces they see, so the service also provides invaluable social support. In between visits, people on their own are reliant upon any systems they have in place, and a daily structure, to maintain their physical and mental wellbeing.
The current situation shines an even brighter light on the vital work that carers, both paid and unpaid, do to support the most vulnerable.
For most people today, the idea of disability inclusion is completely normal. We have ramps, we have sign interpreters, but do we have inclusive sex education?
Disabled people do have sex, however not many people seem comfortable talking about it.
The consequences of this for disabled people range from simply frustrating, to potentially dangerous, as disabled women are almost twice as likely to experience sexual assault as non-disabled women.
BBC reporter Octavia Woodward, talks to Fiona Allan and Aaron Simmonds about their experiences, while asking Enhance the UK’s Emily Yates what we can do to improve the situation.
Working from home is a challenge for many of us, from learning how to communicate with colleagues via Zoom, to acquainting ourselves with the nuances of telephone conference calls. But imagine what it must be like if you are deaf or have difficulty hearing.
Research published on Wednesday by the charity Action on Hearing Loss found that three-quarters of people who live with deafness fear they will be less productive working from home.
Rob Geaney, head of campaigns and public affairs at Action on Hearing Loss, says: “Home working is a huge challenge for people living with deafness or hearing loss. They are at greater risk of further isolation due to social-distancing measures. While many people will use phone and video calls to stay in contact with friends and families and work colleagues, people with hearing loss, especially those who lip-read or use British Sign Language, will be excluded from these interactions.”
Lip-reading requires an individual to concentrate intently on both the movement of the lips and the sound they can hear to piece together what is being said, Geaney explains. This is tiring and many people only get most of what is being said – with contextual clues being used to fill the gaps.
“It is therefore helpful to consider using text boxes or visual presentations alongside video conferences, particularly if communicating numbers or complex jargon,” he says.
“To make the workplace more accessible, face someone when speaking to them, speak one at a time in meetings, and don’t give people a desk facing a wall but allow them to face into the office, so they can communicate,” says Geaney.
“The key thing for home working is that managers should feel able to talk to members of staff about their hearing loss and the adjustments that they need,” he adds.
But the charity’s focus groups revealed a reluctance among employees to disclose hearing loss at work because of embarrassment, stress or fear that it might affect job prospects. One said: “You want to do a good job at work, you do not want anyone to see hearing loss as a weakness.”
“It’s a hidden condition and many staff who have concealed their hearing loss and coped without any support might now need support to find adjustments that work for them,” says Geaney. Similarly, those who had adjustments set up in their place of work might now need new adjustments put in place, such as an amplified telephone or handsets that can be linked to an individual’s hearing aid.
Behaviour changes that hearing colleagues could make include speaking one at a time, muting themselves when not speaking to reduce background noise, having a clear agenda to provide structure and contextual clues to what is being said. For video conferencing it is helpful if the camera is square-on and everyone is well lit from the front. If the source of light is behind the individual then faces might be in shadow.
Action on Hearing Loss research suggests the biggest reason people are without support is that they feel colleagues lack the knowledge to help. Almost half of respondents surveyed said deaf awareness (“information on educating your colleagues or managers”) would help them fulfil their potential, and more than a third said support to manage the anxiety of hearing loss at work would help.
City Lit adult education college in central London holds an annual Deaf Day to raise awareness (although this year’s has been postponed due to coronavirus). Founded in 1919, the college began running lip-reading classes for soldiers deafened in the first world war. Courses specifically for deaf people include BSL, English, maths and digital skills. There are 12 deaf tutors and six who are hearing (but teach in BSL) plus a network of BSL interpreters who offer support in meetings or job interviews. It also provides employment advice to its students in partnership with the Royal Association for Deaf people. A bursary helps low-income deaf students pay course fees and travel.
Mark Hopkinson, head of City Lit’s Centre for Deaf Education, says solutions to better integrating deaf people at work rest on attitudes: “Support in the workplace depends on the organisation and ethos. Are hearing colleagues prepared to help with deaf colleagues?” BSL, in particular, is vital, he says. “Supposing you weren’t allowed to speak for a number of years, [forced] to remain silent, how would you feel?”
English is often a second language for deaf people after sign language. But for Ilyaas Cader, a refugee from Sri Lanka, his first language is Tamil Sign, his second BSL and his third English. “I learned sign language first – that helped me learn the English. I had to learn English grammar, which is different from sign grammar,” he tells me, using a BSL interpreter.
Cader, 45, won a City Lit centenary award last year for outstanding achievement. He is a children’s mental health worker in a specialist NHS unit for deaf children, and says his career is largely due to his time at City Lit. Without the specialist classes and support to get a job, he says, “I definitely wouldn’t be working in mental health where I’m using my skills and my challenging experiences – barriers, emotional struggles, lack of access – to be a role model to children of how a deaf person can succeed.”
Deaf people are twice as likely to have mental health issues compared with hearing people, with communication barriers exacerbating symptoms like depression. There are also communication barriers for deaf people receiving mental health support. BSL interpreters are third parties in counselling sessions designed to be one-to-one. This can affect treatment because the counselling can be less intimate.
Cader believes that “audism” (negative attitudes towards deaf people) is deeply ingrained. More hearing professionals using sign language would help, he says.
“If a deaf person needs to go to the doctor, they should be able to have a conversation with the doctor in their first language. And there should be more people like me out there doing the sort of work I’m doing.”
Remote video trials could disadvantage people with learning disabilities, the equalities watchdog has warned, as courts switch to online hearings during the coronavirus crisis.
An interim report by the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has highlighed concerns about the impact of conducting cases without defendants being present in court.
“Video hearings can significantly impede communication and understanding for disabled people with certain impairments, such as a learning disability, autism spectrum disorders and mental health conditions,” the report says. “People with these conditions are significantly over-represented in the criminal justice system.”
The study is published as the Ministry of Justice pledges to switch more magistrates’ hearings to video sessions. This month 85% of cases heard in England and Wales were using audio and video technology.
The EHRC report quotes criminal justice experts warning that the “human element” was missing from such remote interactions. “Trust and rapport are harder to build up … people and behaviours can be easily misunderstood over remote technology.”
Such barriers to communication were “compounded by the short time slots available for video consultations” between lawyers and their clients who might be in a prison, at a police station or elsewhere.
“Slots for meetings are up to 15 minutes and often shorter, even if the quality of the link is poor,” the report warns. “This may be the first opportunity that a defence solicitor or advocate has to meet their client.”
The EHRC, the government’s advisory body on human rights and equality issues, has not called for video and audio hearings to be halted but has expressed concern about the lack of data available on remote hearings and has urged the government to begin collecting information.
One unnamed defendant told the EHRC: “It wasn’t what I would call a real court because I was in a room all on my own with a screen, but I couldn’t hear what was being said … I found it very difficult and I was unable to take part in it.”
David Isaac, the commission’s chair, said: “Coronavirus presents an unprecedented public health emergency and we know that the government is working hard to allow our justice system to continue to function … [But] it is vital that any new approaches should not accentuate the difficulties that already exist for disabled people in accessing justice.
“Equality before the law means that no one defending themselves in court should be disadvantaged because they are disabled – even during a time of national crisis.”
Cancer Research UK said that the number of urgent referrals by GPs for cancer treatment has dropped by 25 per cent – meaning an average of around 2,300 people every week will have missed a cancer diagnosis.
Screening services in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have been paused, while Cancer Research said they have also been “de facto” halted in England, with appointments not being made.
Around 200,000 people were screened for cancer every week before the outbreak, finding about 2,300 cases.
The charity said pausing screenings meant there were “a significant number of early cancers left undetected”, which meant that surgery to remove cancerous tissue may no longer be an option.
Cancer Research is pushing for the NHS to resume screening once safe, and for “cancer hubs” to be established in private hospitals.
These are areas in hospitals where staff and patients are regularly tested for Covid-19 to ensure that cancer patients are safe from the virus.
Professor Charles Swanton, chief clinician at Cancer Research UK, said: “This pandemic is having a major impact on patients suffering from cancer and the direction it’s heading is really concerning. Delays to diagnosis and treatment could mean that some cancers will become inoperable.
“But it’s not too late to turn this around. Cancer patients shouldn’t need to wait for the pandemic to pass before getting the treatment they need.”
He added: “We can create a safe environment for both staff and cancer patients now that testing efforts are escalating quickly.
“Staff in hospitals around the country are working extremely hard and with more testing of staff and patients – with and without symptoms – we will have hospitals and centres relatively free from COVID-19 where patients can be treated safely, and post-operative complications can be minimised.”
Peter Johnson, NHS clinical director for cancer, said: “We know if cancers are caught earlier more lives are saved which is why early referral for suspected cancer is essential and a major goal for the NHS Long Term Plan.
“Although the NHS is working day and night to tackle coronavirus, it is also open for business in other vital areas such as cancer diagnosis and treatment – if you have worrying symptoms, you should still contact your GP and be referred for further checks.”
Benefits And Work have put together a collection of members’ experiences of PIP telephone assessments. Published here with many thanks to them.
CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT In the main, people seem to be getting written notice of a telephone assessment, as they should, sometimes followed up with telephone confirmation. But it’s not always clear that they are getting the minimum 7 days that they are entitled to.
“I got a letter with a date and time for a phone assessment next week and I’m so stressed”
“I was given approx 10-12 days notice, by letter.”
“I then got a letter saying I would then have a telephone assessment due to Covid-19.”
“Capita confirmed this morning via a phone call that my telephone assessment (review) is still going ahead as scheduled later this week.”
“I had my Telephone Assessment, on Friday. I had 3 days notice, so it was quite a shock.”
NO SHOW We often hear from members that they have waited in for a home visit from a health professional who fails to turn up. They then discover that the assessor claims they visited and no-one was home.
It seems that the same thing can happen with a telephone assessment too.
“On Wednesday April 1 st (yes really) my wife had a telephone assessment booked at 1pm. All prepared with notes and water. We waited and waited and waited. Then at 1:30 I called the Capita “help desk” telephone line. I was told that the assessor had called at 1:10 and then at 1:20 but hadn’t received an answer on the telephone. I explained that we were both here, the phones both had a full signal. I was told it could be a problem at the assessors end and I should call back on Monday 6th to rearrange. I called today and was told that my wife’s case has been transferred back to the DWP and Capita could no longer help. I now have to ring the DWP to get the application transferred back to Capita! So far it has been 30 minutes in the queue”
LENGTH OF ASSESSMENT Members have generally said that this was quite a lengthy assessment process, with somewhere in the region of an hour seeming quite common.
“I have just had my telephone assessment which lasted for 1 hour and 7 minutes”
“I have had one today and what a nightmare 1 1/2 hours”
“The assessment lasted approx 50 minutes”
“The telephone assessment lasted for around one hour and ten minutes.”
ASSESSOR’S MANNER So far, the reports by members about the manner of the assessor have been largely positive. There is often a sensible scepticism about whether a friendly manner necessarily means a fair report. But it does seem that assessors find it easier to be pleasant on the phone than some do in person.
“I’m my son’s appointee and had a telephone assessment on his behalf. The guy was brilliant showed great empathy. I asked at the start could I get my copy of the PIP form I filled in which was no problem. I didn’t need to go back the form once as all he wanted was an expansion on my son’s limitations.”
“He was pleasant and patient with me, even chatty in parts. But I’m under no illusions as to why he was asking what he asked. He ended the call wishing me well, to rest and to expect a decision in 8 weeks time. Whether I get the decision I’d like, as in what I feel I’m entitled to, remains to be seen.”
“I had dla to pip telephone assessment last week, friendly lady, asked questions confirming how my condition affected my daily living, basically everything that I had put on pip application form was reiterated.”
“[The assessor] seemed very professional and encouraging. Whether that is reflected in the outcome remains to be seen.”
“I too just wanted to say that the PIP phone assessment I had was okay. The assessor was polite and respectful. I realize that a ‘nice’ assessor doesn’t necessarily equal a good result but it was not the terrible experience I was expecting.”
CONFIDENTIALITY In a time of lockdown, finding a private space to take part in a telephone assessment may be a real problem for many claimants.
But there really is no excuse for assessors to breach client confidentiality, just because they are working from home.
So, we were particularly appalled to hear from one member who told us:
“At the start of the call, the assessor said I would be on ‘Speaker phone so she could type at the same time. I wasn’t bothered about that, until she spoke to her husband about him putting the kettle on ? Now I’m wondering, if their partner was listening to me, on the Speaker phone?”
READING THE PAPERS IN ADVANCE When there is no possibility of observing the claimant in person, it seems even more important that the assessor has carefully read the PIP form and any other accompanying evidence. Whether this actually happens or not appears to vary.
“from snippets, the assessor said during our conversation, he seemed to have read my form and accompanying sheets so that reassured me a little.”
“seemed to have read my form and additional sheets from the things he mentioned throughout the assessment”
“I asked if she had read the form and 3 other pieces of evidence I sent stating I could walk less than 20 meters? She hadn’t seen the evidence. No I haven’t was the reply it’s not on the system. I phoned capita and asked if it was on the system , the capita agent on the phone said I’ll ring the health care professional to ask her, and she’d said the health care professionals had read them”
QUESTIONS ASKED Given the length of time the assessments are taking, it seems that the health professionals are going through the same questions they would ask if they were carrying out a face-to-face assessment.
“The assessor ran through most of the questions that you can find in the guidance on this site (PIP assessment and review guide, p78 ‘Questions you may be asked at your medical assessment’),and seemed very professional and encouraging.”
“asked questions confirming how my condition affected my daily living, basically everything that I had put on pip application form was reiterated.”
“He didn’t ask very much about my mobility (apart from could I use the stairs if I went out of my front door? – although he did acknowledge he knew I didn’t venture outdoors – was I able to move about my home? So I’m not sure if the few mobility questions were a good sign or not. The questions were more on the Care side of things – do I cook if so do I use the main cooker? what do I cook when I’m able? how often do I bathe? do I use my washing machine? do I manage my medication? Do I use a computer? how do I pay my bills?”
UNCERTAINTY ABOUT WHO CAN GIVE EVIDENCE It is well established in DWP guidance that claimants can have someone with them at a face-to-face assessment to help them give evidence. But this is something that does not seem to have been addressed by assessment providers in relation to telephone assessments, though there is no question that the same guidance should apply.
“I am the appointee for my son who has mental health problems. A phone assessment is scheduled for next week. My son doesn’t ever speak to anyone on the phone due to anxiety issues. Does anyone know if the assessor is likely to continue the assessment with myself only or terminate it due to non-participation by my son?”
“My partner has a telephone assessment on Thursday. Told him it could last for I hour .He has copd and heart problems. I asked could I speak for him as he gets very breathless they said no he has to speak himself.”
NOT WANTING TO USE PHONE Some people were very unhappy with the idea of a telephone assessment. One person clearly had not been made aware of the possibility of a conference call being set up.
“I feel very down and out about this [telephone assessment] as it’s breaching my “self isolation” as I could not go through it alone so my father who also falls into the vulnerable category must assist me and come into my home. I also feel a phone assessment would not highlight my health issues.”
“At a face-to-face assessment (with me present which reassures my relative) the assessor will see their condition. However if a paper assessment – there are no recent psychiatric reports – I fear the outcome. If a phone assessment – I know my relative cannot cope with talking to a stranger on the phone and may well put the phone down or say anything to end the conversation after 5 minutes. I have asked GP to send me letter stating relative cannot cope with phone assessment but realise after this post that now I should ask GP to write more about their condition. I still fear the outcome. But thank Benefits and Work for all the help you give everyone.”
GLAD TO USE PHONE But for some people, a telephone assessment is a definite improvement on having to attend an assessment centre.
“got a letter “inviting” me for a f2f in March (despite going into a great deal about my anxiety/agoraphobia and mobility problems on my forms). My stress levels went sky high. I then got a letter saying I would then have a telephone assessment due to Covid-19. I have to say I was relieved to get a phone assessment as I truly could not have made a f2f.”
Domestic workers make up one group that’s been affected most by the economic shutdown around the world. Many have suddenly been laid off by the families they work for. And since many have travelled abroad to find work, they have found themselves jobless and stranded in a foreign country, often going for years without seeing their children.
The BBC’s Ivana Davidovic hears from Lydia, a Ugandan woman in the US who has lost her job as a home care worker to elderly and disabled; Michelle, a Filipino woman in the UK, who had been a victim of modern day slavery. Just as she thought her life was stabilising, she lost all of her income and can’t support her four children, who she has not seen since 2014.
Simy in Kerala, India, is scared she will lose her house as a loan was secured on it which she and her husband cannot repay now. And Eugenica is stuck in Manilla, after her Hong Kong employers fired her because she wanted to go out and buy some food during lockdown, as they were not providing enough for her to eat.
Claire Hobden from the International Labour Organisation explains that only three countries – Spain, Argentina and France – have tried to protect their domestic workers legislatively, with limited success.
By 10 April, more than 1,000 people were confirmed to to have died in care homes from the virus, up from 217, the previous week. The number of people who died in private homes also more than tripled, to 466.
But the latest assessment of the virus’s impact on the most vulnerable by the Office of National Statistics, released on Tuesday, remains far short of the care sector’s own warnings that many thousands more have already died.
Amid growing concern that figures underestimating the scale of the crisis in care settings may have slowed down the UK government’s response, the Department of Health and Social Care said it was trying to speed up data collection and close the 10-day time-lag in data collection.
Figures gathered from care homes by the Guardian this week show the actual death toll is considerably higher, while Care England and the National Care Forum, which represent home operators, have estimated that between 7,500 and 4,000 residents may have already died from Covid-19. The official figures rely on death certificates, which can take 11 days to process and may not always include Covid-19 as a cause of death, sometimes including deaths from flu, pneumonia or other underlying causes.
By Monday, five of the largest care home providers had recorded 1,052 deaths from confirmed or suspected Covid-19, with the death toll rising sharply in recent days. At least 412 people had died at homes operated by HC-One, the UK’s largest operator. Care UK, which runs 122 homes in England and Scotland, recorded 140 deaths, a 65% increase, in four days, while Four Seasons Health Care reported more than 160 deaths in 190 care homes – a 60% increase in six days.
The latest ONS figures show that of 9,869 Covid-19 deaths to 10 April, less than 11% happened in care homes. By contrast, official figures from Scotland up to 12 April show one in four deaths are recorded in care homes. In Scotland, there were 237 deaths in care compared with 596 in hospitals and 128 at homes and in other non-institutional places, according to the National Records of Scotland.
Meanwhile, Covid-19 has pushed the overall weekly death toll for England and Wales to a record high for the second week running. For the week to Good Friday (10 April), there were 18,516 deaths, the highest number since weekly data was first gathered in 2000. Just over a third of all deaths were attributed to Covid-19 – rising to more than half in London and 37% in the West Midlands, two of the worst affected areas.
In the previous week ending 3 April, 3,475 of deaths registered in England and Wales mentioned “novel coronavirus (Covid-19)” – 21% of those who died.
According to separate, more up-to-date, figures from NHS hospitals in England and Wales released daily by Public Health England, the total death toll from confirmed Covid-19 since the start of the epidemic in hospitals in England and Wales reached 15,412 on Monday.
The latest figures on care deaths are set to fuel the row between social care bosses and ministers over whether enough has been done to save lives in care comes. Local Authority care bosses earlier this month warned the government that, in line with emerging research from the rest of the EU and North America, more people may be dying from coronavirus in care homes and the community than in hospitals, according to a leaked letter.
Ministers have continued to quote the ONS figures while being forced to acknowledge that it is out of data.
The Department of Health and Social Care says it takes a minimum of 11 days for deaths in care homes to feed through into reporting, with the process of death registration taking five days or more. It said it was working with the ONS to speed up the process. Care home operators are obliged by law to quickly inform the regulator, the Care Quality Commission, of deaths but it only started asking whether people had died from Covid-19 on 9 April, two and a half weeks after Boris Johnson announced the UK-wide lockdown. CQC figures are expected to be included in the official data from 27 April.
We hope readers can understand why we felt it was important for our post to include the graphs above.
While the coronavirus pandemic has led to unprecedented restrictions for billions of people, for many with disabilities, the lockdown has paradoxically opened up the world. As society embraces “virtual” living, disabled people – who for years have missed out due to poor access – are suddenly finding themselves able to take part in work, culture, or socialising from their own home.
Nicola Welsh, 43, has always loved going to museums but a painful nerve condition means she’s been housebound for 17 years. As cultural institutions including the National Theatre and the Royal Opera House go online, she’s been able to tour the world visiting museums.
“I ‘went’ to the Watts Gallery [in Surrey] and then the Louvre. The Rijks [museum in Amsterdam] had a walkthrough on their Instagram account,” she said. The experience has been profoundly moving. “Having the opportunity to visit virtually has given me back something that I’d resigned myself to not being able to do within my limitations. I hadn’t realised how much I had missed it.”
For Paula Knight, it was seeing gigs again. The 50-year-old, from Bristol, has been bedridden for two years with severe myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) and had to give up going to concerts. Like many artists, her favourite band, Low, are doing weekly Instagram shows from home during the lockdown. “[Watching them] felt elating, especially when they played my favourite song,” she said. “I was alone in my bedroom but felt part of the audience because everyone else was too. Suddenly, it seems like the abled world I used to inhabit has become accessible to me.”
Brian Spalding, 47, who has been on bed rest for four years with spina bifida, can now socialise with his friends online. “Since lockdown I have actually felt better about my situation, given all of society now experiencing a form of ‘bed rest’,” he said. Spalding, who lives in Argyll, Scotland, is even giving advice to loved ones on how to cope with isolation when they feel anxious or stressed. “I’m finding my community, for so long seeming so much further away, is now literally so much closer to home.”
For others, lockdown has seen career doors open. Laura Elliott, in Sheffield – who has hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, which affects connective tissue, and ME – has always wanted to be a writer. The 28-year-old has been mostly housebound since 2016 and has had a few short stories published in magazines, whilst plugging away at a novel.
“For years, I’ve been looking wistfully at Penguin’s Write Now scheme, which provides potential year-long support for under-represented writers trying to break into the industry, including those with disabilities. Sadly, they’ve always required physical attendance at workshops before,” she said. But because of coronavirus, suddenly the scheme will be conducted online. It means for the first time, Elliot was able to send in an application. “It’s entirely possible I won’t be selected – but at least now I’ll know, instead of being prevented from even giving it a try.”
Last week, churches and cathedrals across the UK broadcast Easter services online, with the archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, speaking from his kitchen using an iPad. Karin Turner, 42, who has a brain injury and broken ankle, is now able to “go to church” online with her pastor in his living room.
“I had been missing the feeling of community. Being able to listen to my pastor preach, hear stories about what is happening in the wider community and have some leadership has made the difference,” she said. “Of course, you can pray and have faith at home, but a big part of Christianity is community and it is difficult to feel cut off from that.”
Even healthcare has opened up; disabled people who have long campaigned to see their doctors virtually, report they are now being offered Skype time with consultants.
As well as joy at being offered new opportunities, many feel frustrated that it took the non-disabled world to become house-bound before access was granted. Emma Duke, 21, who has Pots syndrome – which results in an abnormally increased heart rate after sitting up or standing – and neurological problems, has been trying to get remote access to film classes for her degree for the last three years in Los Angeles. She was frequently refused – “I was told it wasn’t ‘feasible’” – but the coronavirus pandemic means her entire university is now online.
“I am so torn between being so grateful that I can get my education and […] feeling a bit betrayed that it was possible the whole time,” she said.
Rather than “more” opportunities opening up, 30-year-old Tom Staniford in Exeter describes the phenomenon as a levelling of the playing field. “I find it infuriating to see people moaning about reduced mobility, challenges of remote working, fear of illness risk, long periods of isolation – all things many disabled people already endure on a daily basis,” said Staniford, who has the rare MDP syndrome, which leaves him with physical and auditory disabilities. He thinks the lockdown could open up the chance for permanent accessibility. “But my overriding suspicion is it will be a massive missed opportunity.”
Turner is more hopeful. “I feel like people are finally understanding the physical barriers disabled people face,” she said. “I’m actually really optimistic good will come out of this.”
As most readers will know, due to coronavirus, there are no PIP face-to-face assessments for at least 3 months from 17 March to 17 June 2020.
Telephone assessments are not new, they have been going on since PIP was introduced. We already have detailed information about telephone assessments in our PIP guide.
But we are also gathering extra information about how telephone assessments are being carried out during the coronavirus crisis, with assessors working from home and carrying out many more assessments.
If you have had a telephone assessment, especially since the lockdown began, we’d be really grateful if you would complete our brief, anonymous survey to help us learn more. It is all multiple choice questions and should only take a few minutes.
Kate’s discomfort from Ehlers-Danlos syndrome intensifies due to her endometriosis, but any hope of alone time is impossible when isolating with a three-year-old.
Holly is on immunosuppressants and admits she hasn’t packed a hospital bag, as recommended by the NHS, for fear of ‘tempting fate’. Can Kate persuade her otherwise?
Produced by Amy Elizabeth.
Email amy.elizabeth@bbc.co.uk to get a message to Kate and Holly.
The government set up an online register billed as a way to reach “extremely vulnerable” households in England who have been told to shield for 12 weeks – either offering them food parcels via their local authority or liaising with major supermarkets to give priority for online delivery.
But it has emerged that large numbers of disabled and older people are being excluded from the scheme due to the highly selective criteria.
One hundred people with severe disabilities and chronic illness say they have been rejected for the government’s register and thereby left without any support to access food without leaving their home, despite being particularly vulnerable to coronavirus.
Their conditions include cancer being treated with chemotherapy, heart disease, tetraplegia, motor neurone disease (MND), myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) and muscular dystrophy. Some disabled people reported sleeping to avoid hunger pains, or living off fruit. At least one rejected for assistance has gone on to contract coronavirus.
“I’ve had four letters to say I should be shielding yet the Gov.uk site doesn’t recognise me to be put on the online vulnerable list,” said 40-year-old Vicky McDermott in Northumberland, who has the immune disorder rheumatoid arthritis and a daughter with a life-limiting condition who has also been told to shield.
“I tried registering last night for the fifth time. The supermarkets won’t put us on the priority list as we’re not registered with the government.”
McDermott has resorted to buying food from “online corner shops” with a large markup. “A tin of beans is £2,” she said.
Deborah Bhatti, 50, from Bury in Greater Manchester, is on 40 medications a day including for asthma and autoimmune disease, but has not made the list. It means she is not eligible for her local council’s scheme to collect prescriptions or give out food parcels. “I had to share a tin of tuna with my cat,” Bhatti said. “I feel desperate and fearful and have bad dreams every night.”
The Department for Health and Social Care said there was a short delay between people being identified as clinically extremely vulnerable by their GP, and receiving the NHS letter from their clinician, and their identity being pulled from GP records to enable them to register for support. It added it was updating the patient list that enables people to register for support from GP records on a weekly basis.
But both doctors and patients report confusion over how this is being handled. When Denise Stephens, 41, who has multiple sclerosis and is immunocompromised, was rejected, she followed instructions to call her GP but hit a brick wall. “My GP said they couldn’t help me and they didn’t know why the government is directing people to them about this,” she said. Last month, Stephens contracted coronavirus. She has had to call an ambulance twice to her London home but is still not eligible for help with food or medication.
In recent days, the government’s website has begun to allow some people to add their details even if they do not meet the criteria, but charities say this is not enough to stop people missing out.
“We’re hearing from people that their GP won’t put them on the list after they tried to self-register as MND isn’t listed,” said Susie Rabin, the head of policy and campaigns for the MND Association. “I’ve seen responses from MPs to people saying that not everyone with MND needs to be in the list as ‘some may have a mild form’. I’ve never seen a mild form of a terminal illness.”
The charity WellChild estimates any of the 100,000 children and young people with serious medical conditions in the UK do not meet the criteria for the gextremely vulnerable list.
There are also concerns the government is excluding people whose disability means they cannot physically distance safely at supermarkets, such as those with sight loss or autism. One woman with autism and mental health problems, who is self-isolating, said she had lost her carer who helps her shop but still did not make the vulnerable list. “I’m absolutely terrified I’ll be dying of starvation in the coming weeks,” she said.
Lee Kumatat left the UK on 2 January for a brand new life in San Francisco, USA.
Three months later we find her trying to live in lockdown in an unfamiliar city with a guide dog….and Pip, the cat she adopted a week ago.
Holly Lane in Perth, Australia is doing her best not to touch anything but says that’s surprisingly hard when she’s “stumbling” about all day on the sticks she uses. Being a person with cerebral palsy, she has to hold onto things around her to keep her balance.
She’s also cashing in on newly-discovered energy stores after cutting out her three hour commute by working from home.
People taking part in hearings are warned that they must behave in their own home as if they were in a court room, as 85% of all court hearings move to video and audio.
Figures released by HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) this week show that:
On 6 April 2020 around 85% of cases heard in England and Wales used audio and video technology
Between 19 March and 6 April 2020, courts and tribunals reported that the use audio in hearings increased from around 100 to around 1850
Between 19 March and 6 April 2020, courts and tribunals reported that the use video in hearings increased from around 150 to around 1100
Guidance issued by HMCTS on joining a video or telephone hearing warns appellants that during a hearing, even though they are in their own home, they must follow the same rules as if they were in a court room, including:
only drink water
no eating
no smoking or e-cigarettes
make sure the view behind you is blank or neutral
If you need to move away from your screen or phone during the hearing, ask permission.
If you need to have someone with you who is not a legal representative, you must ask the court’s permission.
Appellants are also warned that: “It’s a criminal offence to record or publish any court hearing without authorisation.”
At least that’s the novel approach taken by Teki Paper bags, an Ethiopian enterprise developed by deaf women.
They certainly have the numbers to back it up. With almost a million handmade paper bags sold, the organisation is slowly weaning the country’s bustling capital, Addis Ababa, off plastic bags while simultaneously empowering the deaf community.
It’s a situation that has particularly affected Addis Ababa, where plastic bags are clogging the waterways, causing floods in the rainy season and polluting the land.
“Plastic bags are cheap in Addis Ababa,” explains Mimi Legesse, the charismatic co-manager of Teki. “So business owners will give you a bag with every product you purchase.”
Clement Piguet, Teki’s co-founder, admits that persuading business owners to choose a more expensive alternative is a challenge but lecturing people about the environment won’t always have the desired impact. Instead, Teki believes that if they can also provide a clear social benefit along with the environmental impact, business owners are more likely to invest in a greener alternative.
Clement says: “With our paper bags we want to provide people with the opportunity to change the lives of deaf people, and through this create an alternative way to fight plastic.”
Meskerem Beyene, a resident interpreter at Teki, believes empowering deaf people to engage with clients has had a positive impact on the business. “When someone who can hear tries to sell the bags, people tend not to listen,” she says. “But when Mimi uses sign language people lend us their ear.”
Piguet, who is not deaf, believes sign language is a powerful communication tool, saying: “Sign language has a special power when you use it well; it has a universal aspect because we all have two hands. The way you move them, it fascinates people.”
This fascination led Piguet to visit the Alpha deaf school in his area four years ago. It was here he met Legesse, then a student, who had developed her talent for design while growing up in an orphanage.
Legesse, like many deaf people in Ethiopia, had struggled to find regular employment. “Most business owners are not open to hiring deaf people because they do not want to hire interpreters, so deaf people usually remain in their homes,” she says.
Their serendipitous encounter had an immediate effect on Piguet. “I saw from the way she was using sign language that there was something powerful about Mimi, and when she started to tell me about crochet bags she designs everything started to make sense.”
Today Teki has 18 full-time deaf employees and two interpreters, and services more than 50 clients. It has recently moved to a more central location, making it easier for clients and employees to visit.
Anis Ahmed, a local business owner interested in alternatives to plastic, came to pick up some samples, and after a whirlwind tour of the office, he departed visibly impressed. “I had no idea,” he says. “It’s just amazing to see these women at work, to see them utilising their skills.”
Anis, like all visitors, was asked to spell his name using his hands with the aid of a sign-language poster on the wall, followed by a lively question and answer session with Teki’s employees.
It can be a moving experience for some visitors. “We have around three visits per day,” says Clement. “When they see these deaf women doing such an amazing job, they get very emotional; they can start to cry.”
First impressions are important at Teki, and it can be useful to look your best. “In our culture, we give each person a name according to their appearance, or their experience,” Mimi explains with a smile. “With Donald Trump, for example, we copy his hairstyle by running our hand over our head.”
Few buildings in Addis Ababa have addresses, so bus drivers usually shout out the names of landmarks to indicate where they are heading, which makes transport particularly tricky for deaf people. Some of the women who work at Teki live two hours away. So Teki decided to cover their costs. “We want to create equal pay, especially for the ones who come from far away. I see them as warriors,” explains Clement. As a mother of two, Mimi has also ensured that mothers receive maternity leave.
Despite their success, Clement and Mimi believe they are just at the beginning of their journey. “Our dream at Teki is to initiate the hearing impaired, not just in Africa, but all around the world to fight plastic.”
The coronavirus pandemic could have a “profound” effect on people’s mental health – now and in the future, say psychiatrists and psychologists who are calling for urgent research.
And support would need to be tailored to specific groups, such as children and front-line health workers.
Surveys suggest anxiety and isolation are already affecting the public.
Mental health charity Mind said people were already struggling to access the support they needed.
Twenty-four leading mental-health experts want widespread “moment-to-moment” monitoring of the mental health of the population so that effective tools and support can be designed quickly to help people at home.
“Increased social isolation, loneliness, health anxiety, stress and an economic downturn are a perfect storm to harm people’s mental health and wellbeing,” said Prof Rory O’Connor, one of the paper’s authors, from the University of Glasgow.
He said doing nothing would risk a rise in conditions such as anxiety and depression, and more people turning to alcohol, drugs and gambling, as well as other consequences, such as homelessness.
The paper’s authors said the priorities were to monitor rates of anxiety, depression, self-harm, suicide and other mental-health issues.
Kate King, 57, who has depression, says these are particularly difficult times for people with mental-health conditions.
“Anxiety is a natural response to the situation we are in – I have low-level anxiety all the time.
“You can have waves of it – watching news coverage, thinking about your health and other people…”
But Kate has learnt ways to cope, centring on living for the day – and playing her melodeon (a squeeze box).
“It works for me,” she says. “I can’t go out for coffee so I sit down with people online, or my two daughters, and have one every morning.
“I try to enjoy what I do minute to minute.
“Just going and putting the washing on is something that doesn’t leave you room for worrying around the edges.”
Going out for a walk, however, can feel stressful if there are too many people to avoid – and can make things worse, she says.
Two online surveys, run by the Academy of Medical Sciences and carried out in late March, present a snapshot of the current state of people’s mental health.
One by UK charity MQ, covering more than 2,100 people, including many with mental-health conditions, highlighted their concerns about accessing support and services during the pandemic, as well as the fear that their existing health problems might get worse.
Another, of 1,099 members of the public, revealed worries about the effects of social isolation and financial difficulties created by the response to the crisis.
While a rise in anxiety and stress is expected during the pandemic, the paper says there is a risk that the numbers of people with depression and those self-harming or taking their own lives will increase.
During the Sars epidemic of 2003, for example, there was a 30% increase in suicide in the over-65s, the paper says.
It added that the policies used to manage the pandemic would “inevitably have serious effects on mental health by increasing unemployment, financial insecurity and poverty”.
Who are the most vulnerable groups?
The paper lists eight groups that might experience the pandemic differently from the general population:
children, young people and families (school closures, domestic violence, no free school meals)
older adults and those with underlying health issues (isolation, loneliness, bereavement)
people with existing mental-health issues (disruption to services and relapses)
front-line healthcare workers (fears of contamination, work stress)
people with learning difficulties (changes to routines and support)
people on low incomes (job and financial insecurity)
prisoners, the homeless and refugees (social exclusion)
society in general might experience increased health inequality and a rise in use of food banks
A mental health charity’s view
“While it is too soon to see the extent of the damage, we are hearing that people are already struggling to access the support they need,” says Paul Farmer, chief executive of Mind.
He said people were being discharged from NHS mental-health services, and referrals to children’s and adolescent mental-health services and psychological therapies had dropped.
“Government and services need to understand not only how to support people properly now, but also what the long-term impact is likely to be and the services that will need to be put in place to help people rebuild their lives.”
Mr Farmer said the longer people went without treatment and support, the more unwell they would become.
“The ultimate consequence of this is a rise in self-harm and suicides.”
What is helping people’s mental health and wellbeing?
According to people surveyed:
staying connected with friends and family, often online
keeping busy with hobbies, crafts, reading, films and home improvements
physical activity, such as walking, running and exercise classes
staying calm, thanks to mindfulness, meditation, prayer or pets
information intake – managing access to news and social media
maintaining routine by having a daily plan
What about the impact on the brain?
The experts behind the paper say almost nothing is known about the effect of the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) on the human nervous system.
But since other coronaviruses have been shown to pass into the central nervous system, the paper recommends more research on the effects of Covid-19 in those areas.
Symptoms linked to the brain in people with the infection have been reported, including headaches, dizziness, loss of smell and taste, muscle pain and weakness, among others.
The researchers say a database should be set up to monitor any psychological or brain effects of Covid-19.
Close family members will be able to say goodbye to dying relatives in hospitals and care homes under new coronavirus guidelines, Health Secretary Matt Hancock has said.
He said the UK would introduce new steps to “limit the risk of infection” and allow goodbyes “wherever possible”.
Mr Hancock also launched a new network to supply personal protective equipment (PPE) to care home staff.
It comes as the number of hospital deaths in the UK rose by 761 to 12,868.
Many loved ones have been unable to say goodbye to family and friends since stringent restrictions were introduced to life in the UK on 23 March.
Speaking at Wednesday’s briefing, Mr Hancock said wanting to say goodbye to dying loved ones was “one of the deepest human instincts”.
Announcing the new guidelines, Mr Hancock said: “I’m pleased to say that working with Public Health England, the care sector and many others, we are introducing new procedures so we can limit the risk of infection while, wherever possible, giving people’s closest loved ones the chance to say goodbye.”
Health Secretary Matt Hancock has made big play of the fact relatives are to be allowed to visit dying family in care homes.
This was already allowed under guidance issued on 2 April, but many care homes have blocked visiting because of concern about spread of the virus, partly fuelled by a lack of protective equipment.
The same applies to hospitals. It has meant many people with Covid-19 have died with no family or friends around them.
Just because a minister says it is allowed, it does not mean it will happen.
On the frontline, staff are under huge pressure and are reluctant to take risks.
The practicalities of the new guidelines have not been announced but further details could lie in the government’s social care plan, expected to be published later.
Care providers have been calling for more testing and PPE for weeks, amid outbreaks at more than 2,000 homes.
At the news conference, Mr Hancock extended that promise to include anyone moving from hospital into social care.
Labour’s shadow minister for social care Liz Kendall, said the UK needed a “clear and detailed plan” to protect care home workers and residents.
“More still needs to be done to ensure enough PPE regularly gets to frontline staff, who are desperate not to infect the elderly and disabled people they care for, or their own families,” she said.
“There are too many reports across the country that this vital protective equipment still isn’t getting through.”
Mr Hancock also announced the launch of a “badge of honour” to allow care workers to “proudly and publicly identify themselves” during the pandemic – in a bid to their boost public recognition of all those in caring roles.
And he said supermarkets have been asked to ensure social care workers are given the same priority access as NHS staff.
The consequences of a brain injury are varied and wide ranging. Individuals can experience a wide range of physical, cognitive and emotional difficulties. Even on what can be said to be a routine day, these difficulties can pose great challenges. The current Covid 19 pandemic is anything but routine and not only increases the anxiety and stress levels of those dealing with the effects of a brain injury, but also those of their families, friends and where appropriate carers.
It is even more important therefore to recognise what can trigger heightened stress and challenging behaviour in those with a brain injury and take into account what changes to their daily routine will be unavoidable in the current climate of social distancing. Whilst aids and equipment available and techniques employed to help with daily routines such as diaries, calendars, notice boards and text reminders will still be relevant, there will inevitably be differences to factor in to day to day life to help reduce as much as possible the challenges to be faced during this time of great uncertainty and worry.
In what constitutes normal circumstances those dealing with the effects of a brain injury may find decision making difficult, may be prone to impulsive decision making, mood swings, difficult behaviour and disinhibition. These traits may become even more pronounced at a time when significant changes to daily routines may be being experienced, with possibly difficulties in being able to process efficiently why this is happening. It is therefore even more important than ever to engage in as much planning and discussion as possible, not only to help those with an injury to the brain, but also their families and friend, and in some instances carers. For those living relatively independently and on their own, having to deal with the effects of a brain injury in the current time of substantial change will make day to day living even more stressful and difficult to manage. More than ever they will benefit from the support and understanding of those they interact with on a regular basis. Communication is crucial in helping explain why such a change to daily routines has arisen, and devise the most practical and appropriate strategies to adjust as best as can be achieved and limit the potential harm resulting from a time when certain traits and characteristics may become more challenged.
In some instances a person may be somewhat disinhibited or lack understanding, so struggle with the social distancing measures now in place. Whilst use if remote access to counselling and support is available, this may be difficult to implement where someone is suffering with a more severe brain injury. In the current circumstances it may be appropriate to reduce rehabilitation and/or therapeutic goals to focus on some key objectives and determine how best these can be implemented. There is now wider access to video conferencing facilities, which many businesses are now relying on heavily to continue to operate as effectively as possible. As such facilities become more easily accessible, this may open up more opportunities for a whole range of people, not just those who have suffered a brain injury. There may be even more simple changes to consider, for example, how a shopping experience will now be different for those who can access their local community. All these potential changes to routines need to be considered, discussed and coping strategies devised. This could be by use of cue cards, repeated reminders, or if possible to be accompanied by a family member or support worker, taking all necessary social distancing precautions.
Of is of course highly likely that the current climate will magnify some of the difficulties faced by those living with the effects of a brain injury. This is not only as a consequence of changes to routines, but also the inevitable increase in stress and anxiety levels being experienced by everyone else. It is now more crucial than ever to access support resources, such as Headway for information and guidance. In addition it is important for people to stay as active as possible. This not only will assist with mood, but should also help with maintaining good sleep hygiene, which is vitally important. It is also important to ensure people do not start to rely more on alcohol, caffeine or other stimulants. As with everyone in society at present it is more important than ever for people to talk.
Families of children with special educational needs and disabilities are a resilient and resourceful group of people. Many of the qualities required to endure the coronavirus pandemic – vigilance, self-containment and mutual aid – are basic skill sets to parent carers. Whether at school, work or in community life, we are past masters at social distancing and social isolation.
Our families have poorer physical and mental health than most. We earn less, have higher household costs, are more isolated, and break up and break down more. Somehow, perhaps because we have no choice, we manage to endure.
Ours is also a vulnerable group – not just to the virus itself, but to the social and economic consequences of the pandemic.Little has been said by government or the national media about the very complex needs of our families during this crisis; no answers yet for a parent-carer like Debbie Taylor, an NHS psychotherapist and key worker who cannot send her daughter, Sarah, to school as she has tuberous sclerosis and is prone to chest infections.
The pressure on the NHS also means Sarah’s annual MRI scan, to check that tumours on her major organs have not grown, has been cancelled. Meanwhile, Debbie works and juggles caring for Sarah over an 18-hour day. “I am exhausted, there is no let up,” she says. “Normal coping strategies or self-care mechanisms are all gone. All our support systems were already unravelling. There is no plan B. We are now on our own.”
While Debbie’s daughter is one of 1.5 million people advised by the government to self-isolate for 12 weeks, Maria Barnes, whose son Tom has quadriplegic cerebral palsy, epilepsy and visual impairment, didn’t get that message. Drugs used to control Tom’s epilepsy may have weakened his immunity. A high temperature can trigger his epilepsy. Maria took no chances: she quarantined her family before schools officially closed and now refuses entry to paid carers in order to protect Tom.
Quarantining for Tom means missing out on specialist therapies: physio, speech and language therapy, and support with his visual impairment. Maria is sick with fear. “What if Tom does get the virus and there are two children and one ventilator. What then?”
Maria refers to our families as the “great unseen”. She has a point. Maybe 10-20% of the families who Reaching Families provides with information, training and peer support would fit the government definition of vulnerable: those who have a social worker or an education, health and care plan, which legally entitles children to additional resources and support.
The remaining 80% usually survive with minimal or no external help. Like Lisa, struggling to know how to support her daughter Kaitlin, who has reacted to self-isolation by questioning whether she actually exists, and has begun self-harming and writing the word “REAL” on her arm. Kaitlin is waiting for diagnostic assessment for special educational needs but that has been put on hold. “We’ve essentially lost our support system so have used Reaching Families’ Facebook group to ask other parents for advice,” she says.
These stories are just a handful of what we have learned at Reaching Families in the past three weeks. Charities like ours are doing what we can to meet families’ needs. As a small grassroots organisation, we are fortunate that we can adjust our services to suit the current reality.
Our books and factsheets are already available in PDF and eBook format, and our training has been adapted to deliver as live chat and webinars. Our support groups are on Zoom, and our befriending and counselling is now delivered by video chat or by phone. We are lucky too to have supportive funders, and like many smaller organisations our size and flexibility has enabled us to change track quickly.
But how to ensure the very survival of families already living close to breaking point is something else entirely. It urgently requires national attention, government acknowledgement that our families are a vulnerable group, and investment and support that does justice to that definition. We also need new, creative and flexible solutions to education, health and care needs.
If the pandemic has proved anything, it is that government can move mountains when it has the political willpower to do so. For our community, so long ignored, that must at last mean now. We might be resilient but are far from invincible.
Dr Hannah Barham-Brown, a Leeds GP trainee with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, is helping elderly and vulnerable people recover during the COVID-19 crisis with support from her WHILL powerchair from TGA.
Hannah Barham-Brown is a British Medical Association Council member, speaker, and gender and disability equity campaigner. She is a practicing GP however is currently working for Leeds Community Healthcare which supports an increasing number of senior patients who have been rapidly discharged from hospital. As she has reduced mobility due to Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, she uses a technologically advanced powered wheelchair known as a WHILL Model C.
Hannah is the UK Ambassador for TGA who supplies this multi-award winning product in the UK. In addition to her career, charity work and media commentary, she gives motivational talks and for the second year running, was included in the Shaw Trust’s Power 100 list – making her one of the most influential disabled people in the UK. Hannah is currently caring for elderly people who require support during rehabilitation from hospital before returning to their homes.
Hannah says: “When I went to medical school, I trained for many unexpected things however nothing could have prepared me for everything I would face working during Coronavirus. In many ways, I am very lucky. I’m currently based in the Leeds NHS ‘Recovery Hub’ for older patients who have been discharged from hospital, but need some rehabilitation or a care package starting before they are able to go home. However COVID 19 is now everywhere, with many of those who have it appearing to have no symptoms at all. I am spending much of my day in my WHILL wearing a facemask, visor over my glasses, apron and gloves. My patients aren’t able to have visitors so sometimes I have to make difficult phone calls to loved ones to explain the situation and the options we may or may not have.”
Hannah is able to complete her rounds and consultations with her TGA WHILL which she calls ‘Merida’. As walking is very challenging, she moves around using ‘omni-wheel’ technology which allows pioneering manoeuvrability – with the ability to position herself in tight spaces and closer to patients. This contemporary product can be dismantled and stored in a car boot and ‘parked’ using a remote-control smartphone app.
Hannah continues: “I’m also lucky that my condition doesn’t leave me especially ‘vulnerable’ to Coronavirus – whilst as a healthcare professional I know I am at higher risk of catching it than the average member of the population. I know there is a lot of very justified fear in the disabled community at the moment; as ever, it feels like the challenges faced by wider society are magnified for those who rely on care, and have additional health needs. Please, if you are struggling, reach out. Sites like Facebook and Twitter have an amazing community of disabled people sharing their experiences and supporting each other. TGA Mobility are also helping their customers through social media and to try and support people with mobility and independence. In medical school, the most important thing I learnt was the importance of working as part of a team – my WHILL helps me do this, especially during this incredibly demanding clinical situation.”
The National Records of Scotland said 962 deaths had now been registered in Scotland where the virus was mentioned on the death certificate.
The majority of these deaths occurred in hospital, but 25% were in care homes and 13% in other settings.
In the week from 6 to 12 April, the virus was mentioned in 31% of all deaths registered in Scotland.
The NRS figures provide a wider picture of the impact of the virus on Scotland than the Health Protection Scotland statistics which are announced each day.
The HPS figures, which only reflect cases in hospitals where a positive test has been recorded, placed the death toll at 566 on 12 April.
The new NRS figures said coronavirus had been logged on the death certificate in 962 cases – 608 of them in the past week.
Of the total, 596 deaths occurred in hospitals, 237 were in care homes and 128 were in the home or outside of care.
Just under 70% of all registered deaths involving Covid-19 were of people aged 75 or over, and only eight of those who died were aged under 45.
The report also examines which areas of Scotland have been worst affected.
The Covid-19 death rate is 2.7 per 10,000 of the population in Greater Glasgow and Clyde, and 2.6 in the Borders. However, the rate was 0.8 in Grampian and Western Isles had no recorded deaths.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said the NRS report provided “a comprehensive figure and therefore a more accurate one”.
She said she was “acutely aware” that the figures were “hard to hear” and were “higher than anyone would ever want to think about”.
But she said the information was vital in understanding the spread of the virus and informing what to do next.
Ms Sturgeon said 433 care homes in Scotland had now recorded cases of coronavirus, and stressed that the government was “doing all we can to prevent infection and to control it when there is infection in a care home”.
She said moves would be made to test all patients in care homes who were showing symptoms of Covid-19.
However, she said guidance to homes was “already very clear”, and that isolation and social distancing remained “the most important factor” in managing and preventing infection.
And she stressed that “none of us are powerless” in the face of the virus, as “all of us have some control here” by following lockdown rules.
The provisional total number of deaths in Scotland for the week up to 12 April was 1,969 – “much higher” than the average for the same week over the last five years, which was 1,100.
Ms Sturgeon said that while much of the increase could be attributed to the virus, “not all of it can”. She said this was a “very serious issue for us to look into and explore further”.
The first minister also said 1,748 people were currently in hospital with the virus, 195 of whom are in intensive care.
Both of these figures are down on recent days, which she said was “cause for some very cautious optimism”.
How is this different from the daily data?
The figures announced each day by the Scottish government come from Health Protection Scotland (HPS), and reflect coronavirus cases which have been confirmed by laboratory testing.
This daily figure reveals how many people have died in hospital within 28 days of testing positive for the virus.
The wider figures which come out on Wednesdays are from the National Records of Scotland, and capture a bigger picture.
They include all cases where Covid-19 is mentioned on a death certificate – even if the patient was not in hospital and had not been tested, and even where the virus is a “suspected” cause of death or one of a number of factors.
This is why they are referred to by NRS as cases “involving” coronavirus – the data captures all deaths where the virus was a confirmed, suspected or probable cause of death, either as an underlying cause or directly contributing to it.
As well as being wider, these figures are also broken down in more depth than the HPS ones, with extra figures including the age range of those dying, their gender, where they were in the country, and whether they were in hospital, a care facility or at home.
All care home residents and staff with Covid-19 symptoms will be tested for coronavirus as laboratory capacity increases, the government has promised.
Health Secretary Matt Hancock said he was “determined” to ensure everyone who needed a test had access to one.
Labour welcomed the pledge but said the social care sector needed more support.
Care providers have been calling for more testing for weeks, with charities saying the virus is “running wild” amid outbreaks at more than 2,000 homes.
At the moment only the first five residents who show symptoms in a care home are tested, to determine whether there is an outbreak of the virus.
Providers have also complained that deaths among residents were being “airbrushed” out of official figures and demanded greater support for the industry.
Sir Keir said his party would support the government if, as expected, it extends lockdown measures later this week. But he called for more transparency about how and when the rules will be relaxed.
However, Mr Sunak insisted: “It’s not a case of choosing between the economy and public health.”
Figures released on Tuesday revealed 12,107 people had died in hospital with the virus, an increase of 778 on the previous day.
And Office for National Statistics data, which includes every community death linked to Covid-19 in England and Wales, showed 406 such deaths registered up to 3 April had occurred outside of hospitals – 217 of them in care homes.
However, the total is expected to have increased since then.
Britain’s largest care home operator, HC-One, said the virus represented about one-third of all deaths at HC-One’s care homes over the last three weeks. And MHA, a charity which operates 131 homes, said it had recorded 210 coronavirus-related deaths to date.
Mr Hancock said he would ensure anyone in a care home with symptoms of the virus, as well as any new care home residents being discharged from hospital into care, would be tested.
“Testing is key in our battle against coronavirus, and as part of our plan to prevent the spread and save lives we will ensure that everyone in social care who needs a test can have a test,” Mr Hancock said.
‘Sense of insecurity’
Gail Grant, from Swindon in Wiltshire, has not been able to visit her husband Ian for three weeks.
Ian, a former dentist, has dementia and lives in a care home in Marlborough, some 12 miles away. He turned 70 this month.
“Because of his cognitive level, we can’t Skype or talk on the phone. He doesn’t have any understanding of the situation and doesn’t really know us anymore. But it’s more me – I’m aware I’m not going to see him,” Dr Grant says.
“They say they don’t have any cases at the moment at his home. But I think it’s a matter of time. And when any carers go down with it, it will be a difficult situation.”
She says of the official figures currently just including hospital deaths: “What right do they have to withhold information that should be in the public domain?”
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is co-ordinating the effort and will offer tests to the UK’s 30,000 care providers by the end of the week, the Department for Health and Social Care said.
Mr Hancock is set to give further details of the scheme when the government’s coronavirus social care action plan is outlined on Wednesday.
The latest figures show a total of 302,599 coronavirus tests have been conducted in the UK.
Dr Clare Wenham, assistant professor of global health policy at LSE, told BBC Newsnight the government was “nowhere near” hitting its target.
“I just don’t know how they can,” she said.
“We don’t have the same infrastructure and laboratory capacity of some of the countries which are really leading the way on this like South Korea and Germany. So I hope they can [hit the target], but I’m not hopeful they will.”
Labour’s shadow minister for social care, Liz Kendall, said her party looked forward to details of how the increased testing would be delivered.
Ms Kendall also called on ministers to ensure care homes are given sufficient personal protective equipment (PPE) to safely care for people with the virus.
And she renewed her party’s call for the government to release daily figures on deaths outside hospitals “so we know the full scale of the challenge we face”.
“The current figures are airbrushing older people out like they don’t matter,” Age UK director Caroline Abraham said.
Britain’s largest care home operator HC-One said coronavirus was present in two-thirds – 232 – of its homes.
The ONS figures show more than one in five deaths in England and Wales is linked to coronavirus, with Covid-19 mentioned on 3,475 death certificates in the week ending 3 April.
Unlike the daily figures, which only include people who have tested positive for Covid-19 and died in hospital, the ONS includes deaths in other settings.
Its data shows one in 10 coronavirus deaths this year have been in the community with more than half – 217 – in care homes.
‘Very difficult time’
Ms Lyons said: “It is like losing 15 grandparents all in the space of two weeks.
“You spend every day with these people – 12 hours a day – often more than… your own family.
“It has been a very difficult time.”
Oak Springs appealed earlier this month for more “hands-on” staff after 50 of its 72 workers had to self-isolate.
Ms Lyons said she had managed to fill the rota after an “absolutely amazing response” from agency staff, ex-doctors and Liverpool City Council.
An independent care home in Southport, Merseyside, with 25 residents, said it had not had a single case of the virus or any staff off self-isolating.
Lynsey Mylrea, who runs Glade Residential Care, said: “I had a sixth sense and pre-empted the government lockdown by about three weeks. I’m so glad I did.”
Paralympic gold medallist Kelly Gallagher has spoken of her joy at becoming a mother for the first time in the midst of the coronavirus crisis.
Kelly gave birth to Brigid Mary on 25 March in the Ulster Hospital.
“We were so anxious with all the coronavirus going on around the place. It’s an uncertain time anyhow when it’s your first pregnancy,” said Gallagher.
“But it was a lovely experience, even if it wasn’t the experience we were initially expecting. We are delighted.”
The 34-year-old added: “When you come out of the hospital you just want people to be around you but there were no balloons or flowers or visitors.
“We are trying to look on the bright side – it means that me, Gerard [Kelly’s husband] and Brigid get to really bond and hang out together.”
Gallagher, who is visually impaired, picked up her gold medal in the super-G category at the 2014 Sochi Winter Games and is also a multiple World Championship medallist.
‘Brigid Tohill’s Diary’
The Bangor woman says the restrictions imposed by self-isolation and social distancing to help prevent the spread of coronavirus are necessary but make for a different experience for parents of newborns and their families.
“I was probably a bit naive in the run-up. I thought we would be able to show our baby off and be able to visit friends and family,” explained Gallagher.
“Before I went into hospital I was in and out of my mum’s house but it has escalated since then and now none of my family or friends can physically touch her.
“We are really in our own little self-isolation in order to stay home and save lives and make sure everyone is as safe as possible.
“I put together little videos on social media of her basically breathing and smiling and I call them ‘Brigid Tohill’s Diary’. We are trying to make the most of being close but being separated at the same time.
“It is heartbreaking when you are putting a baby up to the window so someone can have a little look.
“It’s a new way of life that has come on everyone so quickly but if it means more people are safe and healthy it is worth it.”
Professionalism of NHS staff ‘unreal’
The County Down native is fulsome in her praise of the care and attention she received during her hospital stay and the work being carried out by NHS workers in general during the Covid-19 pandemic.
“Pregnant women are worried whether their husband or birthing partner will be there with them or what it’s going to be like in the present circumstances but the nurses and doctors are working so hard to make sure you are prepared and cared for.
“All the midwives and everyone else were so supportive and so helpful. The corridors are so quiet but the doctors are trying their best to make sure we are all happy and healthy.
“Their professionalism is unreal. All these people are pulling together and putting themselves and their families at risk.”
‘Like having a crazy friend to stay’
Gallagher adds that one-week-old Brigid is already making her presence felt in the Tohill household, a scenario which most first-time parents will empathise with.
“Wednesday afternoon was the change of our lives. We have a new boss and we are under a new regime,” she quipped.
“It’s like having a crazy friend to stay who is ordering you around your own house. Hopefully soon we will be able to celebrate together with everyone.”
People with learning disabilities or autism can leave the house for exercise more than once a day and can travel outside of their local area under current lockdown measures, the government has said.
The guidance, which had previously stated that non-essential workers should only leave their homes once a day for exercise or to shop for basic necessities, was amended on Wednesday.
The updated advice reads: “If you (or a person in your care) have a specific health condition that requires you to leave the home to maintain your health – including if that involves travel beyond your local area – then you can do so.
“This could, for example, include where individuals with learning disabilities or autism require specific exercise in an open space two or three times each day – ideally in line with a care plan agreed with a medical professional.”
Although those with autism and mental health conditions are advised to limit their travel, and stay as close to their local area as possible, carers and support workers who do not live in their household can accompany them.
The change comes after lawyers from Bindmans LLP and 39 Essex Chambers were asked for help by two families with children on the autistic spectrum.
Bindmans said one of the children, whose conditions mean it was necessary for them to leave the house more than once a day for their wellbeing, was deliberately taken to a quiet location outside of their local area because of their particular needs.
The firms argued that the “inflexible policy”, which also says people should stay two metres apart from anyone outside of their household, disproportionately impacted those with certain health conditions and was “therefore unlawful and discriminatory”.
After the amendment was made to the guidance, one of the affected families said they were “delighted” they could support their son’s needs “without breaking the rules”.
That would have added an extra 11% to the official UK figures, based solely on deaths in hospitals, that were being reported at that time.
Of those extra deaths, 217 took place in care homes, 33 in hospices, 136 in private homes, three in other communal establishments and 17 elsewhere.
Northern Ireland’s chief medical officer has said details about the number of coronavirus-related deaths in care homes remain unclear, but it was reported last week that there were cases of Covid-19 in 20 care homes across the nation.
They have also called for a daily update on deaths in the care system.
It comes after the government confirmed there had been coronavirus outbreaks at more than 2,000 care homes in England – although they did not specify the number of deaths that had occurred.
The figures prompted the charity Age UK to claim coronavirus is “running wild” in care homes for elderly people.
“The current figures are airbrushing older people out like they don’t matter,” Caroline Abrahams, the charity’s director, said.
Meanwhile, Britain’s largest care home operator said coronavirus was present in two-thirds – 232 – of the group’s care homes.
Its director, Sir David Behan, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that coronavirus deaths represented about one-third of all deaths at HC-One’s care homes over the last three weeks. HC-One has 329 care homes throughout England, Scotland and Wales.
About 410,000 people live in care homes in the UK, living in 11,300 care homes for older people supplied by 5,500 different providers.
Addressing why deaths in care homes are not being included in the government’s data, Ms Coffey told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that the figures published weekly by the ONS is a “fair” way of establishing the “unfortunate picture” of where deaths are occurring.
England’s care home regulator, the Care Quality Commission, has said it will begin recording deaths in adult social care from this week – asking care providers to give daily updates on the number of confirmed and suspected cases.
Labour’s shadow social care minister Liz Kendall said daily figures were essential to dealing with the “emerging crisis” in care homes and called for the government to offer social care “whatever resources it needs”.
Conservative peer and former work and pensions minister Baroness Altmann told Today that “one or two” people in care homes had said to her they felt as though older people are being treated “like lambs to the slaughter”.
“They [care homes] are left without protective equipment, they are left without testing,” she said.
She added that “the mark of a civilised society” was “how it treats it most vulnerable and oldest citizens”.
It comes after Ms Abrahams said care homes were “underprepared” for the outbreak, adding that the lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) and testing was leading to the spread of coronavirus across the care home sector.
However, Ms Coffey told the Today programme that the care sector was not being left behind, adding that PPE was being delivered “to over 26,000 care settings across the country including care homes, home care providers and also hospices”.
On Monday, the UK’s chief medical adviser Prof Chris Whitty told the daily Downing Street coronavirus briefing that 92 homes in the UK reported outbreaks in one day.
The Department of Health and Social Care later confirmed 2,099 care homes in England have so far had cases of the virus.
Care England has estimated there have been nearly 1,000 deaths from coronavirus in care homes, leaving social care as “the neglected front line”.
The Labour Party has called on the government to publish daily figures of deaths in care homes to highlight the “true scale” of the spread of the virus, which causes the Covid-19 disease.
The issue has regularly been raised by journalists at the daily Downing Street briefing and the government response has been that the number announced each day is based on hospital figures as this can be quickly gathered and analysed – whereas deaths in the wider community take much longer to be collated after death certificates are issued by doctors.
The government says it is following the international standard by quoting the hospital figures each day – and that the fuller ONS figures can lag many days behind.
St David’s Care Home owner Ivan Cornford, 58, decided the best way to protect residents was by blocking access to the outside world.
It was only possible thanks to 11 of his employees volunteering to live in the home — and sacrificing contact with their own families for the entire time.
The ‘St David’s 12’ moved in on March 19 — a week before the UK-wide lockdown — and will stay until April 20.
Mr Cornford told STV News: “There wasn’t any clear guidance, so we decided that by sealing off the home and not letting anyone in we should keep the virus out.
“We got 11 volunteers to come and join us, they all said ‘yes’ without any hesitation. The families have been overwhelmed by the dedication of the staff. Their selflessness and dedication has been incredible.”
St David’s in Forfar, Angus, is home to 22 residents who hope the self-imposed isolation will keep them safe from Covid-19, which poses a greater threat to the elderly.
In the past week, two Scottish homes have suffered suspected outbreaks. Sixteen residents died at Glasgow’s Burlington Court, while eight lives were lost at Castle View Care Home in Dumbarton.
Other care workers have complained that a lack of adequate personal protective equipment is increasing the risks to those they are looking after.
Care workers Izzy Pringle and Lynn Morrison are sharing a makeshift bedroom at St David’s which they’ve named the ‘Shangri-la suite’, after the mythical paradise.
Izzy, 58, from Colliston, Angus, did not hesitate when asked if she would move in, adding: “It’s been amazing, really good, and the residents are enjoying having us here full-time. No one is bringing in the virus.
“I’ve been FaceTiming my husband and my two daughters and grand-daughter every night so I can keep in touch that way. Coming out of here is going to be emotional, we’ve all become so close.”
Lynn, 54, from Forfar said: “It was a case of whatever is better for the residents. If their wellbeing is better with us here, then that’s where I’ll be.
“It does feel a bit like we’re living in a bubble though. When I watch the news it’s hard to believe what’s going on.”
During the evening, staff and residents can unwind and enjoy a takeaway treat on Saturday nights.
Christine Macrae is one of two resident cooks. The 53-year-old, from Forfar, said: “In the evenings we get to have a bit of social time, and a few beverages – just a few though.
“A lot of the residents like to come and sit with us and join in the banter and they’re really enjoying that. We’re getting more involved with their life stories as we have more time to sit with them, they’re telling us things that they wouldn’t normally have told us.
“Sealing off the home was definitely the right thing to do. The residents are very vulnerable and if we can protect them by doing this then we can go to bed at night and sleep easy.”
Care worker Karen Black, 57, also from Forfar, said: “When they asked for volunteers to do this I thought there are people at home with young kids, and I have a son of 21, so I’m able to do it.
“It’s not the same as being at home but it’s as close as you can get. I love working here anyway, it’s a lovely home, a great place to work.”
Staff and residents can speak to visitors from the home’s balcony. Families can book visiting slots online and must stand in a designated safe space in the car park.
Mr Cornford maintains regular contact with other staff who are self isolating at home in preparation for their month-long stay.
He said: “The main aim for us is that the four weeks of isolation gives us a grace period, and the chance to plan ahead for the next round of staff coming in.
“They have all been following strict social distancing and calling in every day to report how they are.
“What we’re doing at the moment, sealing off, for most care homes this isn’t an option, and I get that. We have the bed space, we have staffing able and willing to do it and for us it is working.
“This is a care business, but you build up relationships with the people you look after, you get to know them, they’re part of your family, and you wouldn’t want family members to be ill.”
Dr Donald Macaskill of Scottish Care, which represents most independent care homes, said: “During these unprecedented times, I would like to commend everybody working in the frontline of the health and social care sector, who are trying their utmost to provide care and support to those who need it.
“This includes a thanks to all of the care staff who have made the decision to reside in the care homes they are working in, putting others before themselves by selflessly looking after residents day and night.
“These individuals are a shining light of the sector but by no means alone.”
The Care Inspectorate confirmed there had been a number of deaths at Almond Court in Drumchapel, Glasgow.
According to the Scottish Sun, a total of five residents have died after contracting coronavirus, and one staff member is currently ill.
The 42-bed care home, owned by the Holmes Care Group, specialises in dementia care and frail elderly care.
A spokeswoman for the Care Inspectorate said: “We are aware of the tragic death of residents at this care home as a result of suspected cases of Covid-19.
“Our thoughts are with the loved ones of those affected as well as the staff and wider community of the home.
“We have been notified of the circumstances and we are in contact with the care service and the local health and social care partnership during this difficult time.
“All of Scotland’s social care sector is working under very difficult circumstances to care for people during the pandemic and the Inspectorate is doing everything it can to support them.”
Almond Court is the fourth care home to report multiple Covid-19 deaths in the last month.
Health Secretary Jeane Freeman said 406 care homes in Scotland had at least one confirmed or suspected case of coronavirus, representing 37% of the country’s care homes.
Nicola Sturgeon said in her Monday briefing that figures due out later in the week would detail where people had died including whether it was in a hospital, a care home or at home.
Earlier the owner of a Scottish chain of care homes told BBC Scotland he believed nearly two thirds of his homes have coronavirus cases.
He told Good Morning Scotland the official figure for deaths in Scotland did not reflect the actual number of suspected care home deaths.
He estimated there would have been a further 200-300 deaths due to the virus not included in the total.
He also described the situation regarding testing as a “postcode lottery”.
He said: “As far as testing of care home residents goes, it doesn’t seem to be government policy.
“I would ask the question why are these vulnerable elderly being treated as second class citizens and not being given access to testing when they have symptoms?
“We are discouraged from asking for them to be hospitalised and the tragic sad death figures are for hospital deaths, not for care home deaths or deaths at home.”
At the weekend, trade body Scottish Care said the impact of the virus on residents alongside staff absence levels of up to 30% had put homes under huge strain.
Scottish Care’s members provide the vast majority of Scotland’s 36,000 care home beds, with chief executive Dr Donald Macaskill saying the virus had left the sector facing an “unprecedented challenge on every front”.
Information gathered by Scottish Care from its members suggests that about half of care homes in Scotland have at least one suspected case of coronavirus.
It has not been disclosed how many other residents at the 72-bed home are ill. One resident who tested positive for the virus is in hospital.
Care UK regional director Karen Morrison said: “We are completely devastated that this many residents have lost their lives to what we believe to be Covid-19.
“Our thoughts and condolences are with all those families who have lost someone.
“The team at the home continue to be absolutely amazing and I cannot thank them enough.
“Despite all that has happened, they continue to deliver the very best care in a kind and professional way.
“They have had all the necessary PPE and have been using it meticulously ever since the first case was seen at the end of last month.”
Limited access to Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), hygiene products and a lack of interaction are some of the biggest concerns for parents.
One charity said these families urgently needed reassurance.
Speaking in the assembly on Thursday, Education Minister Peter Weir said his department was in constant contact with special schools.
There are 39 such schools across Northern Ireland, all of which closed amid coronavirus health and safety concerns last month.
‘Inhumane’ lack of support
Marian Bradley’s 17-year-old daughter Meabh has cerebral palsy.
Mrs Bradley said the lack of support she had received since the school closed had been “inhumane, unfair, unjust and once again it’s the people who need the most help being left behind”.
“Families in our situations are so isolated at the best of times,” the Belfast woman told BBC News NI.
“When your child goes to school, it’s the first time parents start to hear good news and that their child has potential and they’re in an environment which, hopefully, allows them to start fulfilling that potential.
“But that’s now gone.”
The charity Children in Northern Ireland said the government had a responsibility to young people with disabilities and their families “to ensure no further structural discrimination takes places during this pandemic”.
Its chief executive, Pauline Leeson, said the charity had experienced an “overwhelming” number of calls from parents of disabled children.
At Stormont on Thursday, Alliance MLA Chris Lyttle asked Education Minister Peter Weir how children with special educational needs (SEN) were being catered for.
Mr Lyttle told BBC News NI that the education and health ministers “must urgently clarify what they are doing to support the delivery of learning, health and social care normally accessed by pupils at special schools at home”.
Mr Weir told the assembly: “In the vast bulk of cases most parents – even if there is a level of medical vulnerability – have expressed a desire that they want to look after their child directly at home.
“Many of the schools are not open at present and we’re trying to facilitate where there is opening.
“But we’ve been told by 23 of the special schools that they’ve had no request by any parent to be open.”
Mrs Bradley said she would like to see schools “becoming leaders in all of this”.
“Just because (the pupils) are not able to go to school, doesn’t mean they should be forgotten about,” she said.
‘Parents are struggling’
“You don’t want a child that is making so much progress in school to go backwards now and the poor parents, stressed out, worrying about them.
“We had finally got Meabh a social life where she went to school, all her wee groups and swimming, and now none of that is happening.
“We’ve had to explain to her that it is just too dangerous for us to take her out and we have to stay well, but that’s very hard for a young person to understand.”
Some parents say that, with limited access to PPE, they are also struggling to secure online shopping slots for food and are worried about going to pharmacies.
Ashling Fitzmaurice, from Newry, County Down, is concerned about her three-year-old daughter, Lily, who has CASK gene mutation.
They are self-isolating, to protect Lily, whose condition affects brain development.
Lily attends Rathore Special School where she receives physiotherapy, speech therapy and occupational therapy.
“She also attended music therapy, equine therapy and play therapy via the autism group which all helped with Lily’s development but with the current situation they have been all cancelled,” Ms Fitzmaurice told BBC News NI.
“I’m missing the advice from the other parents in the autism group, too, as they have been a great source of information and support.
“We really won’t know the full extent that missing months of therapies will have on Lily as early intervention is key for Lily and other children with SEN.”
‘Taking steps backwards’
Ms Fitzmaurice added: “Lily is coping well at present – she enjoys her own space – but our worry is that Lily has a lot of anxiety around others.
“It took a long time for her to settle into school and she struggled to go to play centres or anywhere too busy.”
After a few months of tears, Lily was progressing well at pre-school and she was even able to attend assembly a few weeks ago.
“But the longer she is out of school and therapies, the harder it will be for her to adjust back into them again,” said her mother.
“We will be taking steps backwards in her ability to socialise.”
A spokesperson for the Department of Education said the minister had decided all schools should open for the children of key workers and vulnerable children where it was safe to do so.
“Schools have put provisions in place to maintain the educational needs of children,” they added.
“The Education Authority has moved many of its services to support children with SEN online.
“Parents who have concerns that the needs of their children are not being met should discuss this with the school or their health and social care trust.”
Psychological first aid should be provided as the UK runs the risk of a “future mental health crisis”, the British Psychological Society said.
Ministers say NHS staff can call a helpline if they are feeling stressed.
But MPs say this is not enough and that the government should provide extra support to those feeling overwhelmed.
The cross-party group says any support should be extended to all front-line staff such as care home staff, mortuary workers and cleaners.
In a letter, MPs call for management in front-line organisations to put in place preventative measures like regular breaks, encouraging people to look after themselves and to tell people that it is “OK to not be OK”.
The MPs and British Psychological Society also say professional help from psychologists and therapists needs to be easily accessible – so trauma can be dealt with early.
Front-line staff in the coronavirus crisis are routinely exposed to things the general population would never encounter – loss of patients, illness of colleagues, high levels of stress and increased exposure to Covid-19.
Trauma can leave some with insomnia, feeling disorientated, with a sense of guilt or even physical symptoms like shaking, headache, loss of appetite and aches and pains.
Some people could see a deterioration of their mental health or develop anxiety or PTSD.
“We are running the risk of a future mental health crisis and a generation of burnt-out health workers,” said Kathryn Scott, director of policy at the British Psychological Society.
“If we act now with a plan focused on prevention and leadership we can minimise the impact of trauma on responders to Covid-19.”
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: ”We share the concerns that this epidemic poses challenges to the mental health and wellbeing of all our health and care workers.”
The spokesperson said NHS England had partnered with Headspace, UnMind and Big Health to offer “free-to-use mental health apps for both NHS and care staff”.
A £5m grant was also available for mental health charities to fund additional services for people who are struggling, the spokesperson said.
Dr Andrew Molodynski, a consultant psychiatrist and mental health lead for the British Medical Association, said: “Health workers are used to seeing death, but we aren’t used to seeing lots and lots of people die when we can’t do anything about it.
“That will cause a lot of symptoms of anxiety, depression and trauma.
“I’m already seeing that in my hospital – staff are anxious and some are already off work because of the impact that has had on their mental health.”
The all-party group of MPs has asked the government to encourage the NHS and care organisations to treat their staff with compassion, and signpost ways to get help.
The MPs also call for a focus on psychological first aid, developed for use in disasters like hurricanes or wildfires in the US.
It sees people at risk encouraged to seek help and support one another with stress before it becomes a serious permanent problem.
SNP MP Lisa Cameron, who wrote the letter to Health Secretary Matt Hancock, said protecting the mental health of staff was “essential” – just like providing adequate protective equipment.
Ms Cameron added: “If we fail to act now, front-line staff and communities will be living with the psychological consequences of coronavirus for decades to come.”
When her newborn son was placed in her arms for the first time, Lucy Lintott shed tears of joy. It was the most natural of reactions after what was, undeniably, a remarkable pregnancy.
The 25-year-old was diagnosed with motor neurone disease (MND) in 2014, making her the youngest person in Scotland with the terminal disease.
The illness cast doubt over the very possibility of Lucy bearing children – and so when baby L J arrived in February, she could not believe he was real.
“I had built it up so much in my head, I didn’t think it was going to happen,” said Lucy. “I was very emotional and I wouldn’t let anyone take him off me.”
MND gradually makes gripping, walking, talking and swallowing extremely difficult – and eventually impossible. It kills about a third of people within a year and more than half within two years.
Yet six years on from her diagnosis, Lucy, from Garmouth in Moray, says she is experiencing the “best feeling ever”, taking care of her “strong, cheeky bundle” – who has a “great set of lungs”.
Lucy says she has navigated early motherhood without much advice, given that MND usually affects people over the age of 40 and, as such, pregnancy among patients is incredibly rare.
She said: “I think there’s only five or six cases in the world of people who have given birth while having MND.
“They didn’t know how my body or lungs would deal with it so it was really up to me.
“But it went really well – the only thing I did was come off medication to give L J the best start in life.”
Just weeks ago, Lucy and her fiancé Tommy were planning a May wedding, which has now been postponed due to the coronavirus pandemic.
As one of the 400 people in Scotland with MND, Lucy has been advised to stay at home for 12 weeks.
Normally she would go about her daily life with assistance from three carers – however, she has had to move back to her parents’ home in order to protect her health and still receive the care she needs.
She said: “Because of isolation, I’m down to one carer and I can’t really go out.
“The coronavirus has had a massive impact, I’d normally be out shopping, at the gym or seeing friends.
“I’ll have to reorganise the wedding – and it’s hard enough preparing one wedding then to have to change it all. So I’m quite gutted.”
‘It’s crazy and surreal – but the best feeling ever’
In 2017, Lucy gave a stark account of how MND was like being “slowly paralysed” in the BBC documentary MND and the 22-year-old Me.
However, her strength, positivity and good humour were very much at the forefront of her story – she confessed most people knew her for her “weird-ass laugh”.
Such qualities have now carried her through not just the upheaval of lockdown, not just illness and not just the challenges of parenthood – but all three at once.
She says that living with her parents has been a “godsend”, and laughs as she admits the greatest challenge to her family – “probably dealing with me”.
She said: “I’m really looking forward to introducing LJ to friends and do what we’d normally do over the summer, like going swimming or taking him to the park. Just the little things.
“I’m staying away from the coronavirus and my MND is stable and hasn’t really changed.
“It’s very crazy and surreal that I’m a parent – I’m responsible for a little bundle. But honestly, it’s the best feeling ever.”
This made a very good watch over the Easter weekend. If you’re trying to fill an hour in lockdown, do put it on your watchlist!
Elizabeth developed Tourette’s when she was 40. This personal, fun and moving documentary provides an insight into how an ordinary family deals with an extraordinary condition.
Voyage Care, which cares for the group, was sent the letter by a surgery in Somerset amid the coronavirus crisis.
On Twitter, the firm’s boss Andrew Cannon said there had been “no consultation with families” and most involved were “working age adults”.
Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) has declined to name the surgery.
It said it was investigating the matter.
The paperwork is known as a “do not resuscitate” (DNR) order or an advanced care plan.
It is sometimes used if someone is nearing the end of their life or have a complex medical condition.
The paperwork is usually drawn up by medical professionals with the co-operation of the patient in question, if they have capacity to do so, or with their family.
The Somerset Local Medical Committee, which represents all GP practices in the county, said the letter had been withdrawn.
The CCG was alerted by the Somerset Parent Carer Forum.
A forum spokesman said: “We have reported our concerns to Somerset CCG that this has happened with our area and they are taking this matter very seriously.
“The CCG are investigating the reports that have been made and have assured us they will take appropriate action. Please do let us know if you come across this.”
Similar cases happened last week in Brighton and south Wales, as health and social carers respond to the coronavirus pandemic.
The type 1 diabetics had become known for their videos on the social media platform TikTok and dispelled myths around the condition, but the current pandemic and self-isolation has meant they’ve had to get creative with how they make their content.
In this episode of Cabin Fever the duo reveal why diabetes is classed as High Risk in relation to Covid-19, how their emotions affect their blood sugar levels and their recent obsession with tie-dye loungewear.
This week’s presenters are having quite different quarantine issues. Simon Minty is a little person and says that had a stranger turned away from him in the street he would have taken it badly a few weeks ago – now it’s positively welcome!
And Emma feels liberated by lockdown. As a blind mum she says her house and garden are her “castle” and being at the home she knows so well means she can run about and play with her young boys independently.
The UK’s organ transplant network could be forced to shut down as a result of the coronavirus outbreak, the body that runs the scheme is warning.
One factor is the pressure on intensive care beds, according to NHS Blood and Transplant (NHSBT).
But there is also the risk to transplant patients, who have their immune systems suppressed so their bodies don’t reject new organs.
Since the beginning of March the number of transplants has fallen dramatically.
This time last year more than 80 transplants were being carried out each week in the UK.
But now just a handful of the most urgent cases – mainly heart and liver – are going ahead.
Pressure on intensive care
Prof John Forsyth, medical director for transplant and organ donation at NHSBT, admits the system may struggle to operate while the epidemic continues.
“When I hear from other countries who have been at the centre of this Covid pandemic, they have got to the point where no transplant is possible in certain regions at all.
“We may get to that point, and we may get to that point in the next days or weeks.
“But we are working very hard to keep organ donation and transplant open for as long as possible, accepting the safety of our patients is paramount.”
The pressure Covid-19 cases are exerting on intensive care units is one important factor.
Both donors and recipients need that high level of care, so fewer potential donor families are being approached.
But surgeons are also understandably reluctant to treat immuno-suppressed transplant patients anywhere near those with the highly infectious Covid-19.
This is the dilemma for those like Ana-Rose Thorpe, from Manchester, who is waiting for a liver transplant.
Now aged 29, Ana-Rose has lived with hepatitis almost her entire life after contracting it as a baby.
The disease has taken its toll and now her liver is failing and she is in desperate need of a transplant.
‘I could get sicker and sicker’
“Having to go into hospital while there are coronavirus patients there is very worrying,” she says.
“This is a window of opportunity for a transplant without the coronavirus.
“Whilst my body could withstand the transplant, the longer I’m not being monitored, not being seen as often as I was, the longer I leave it, I could just get sicker and sicker.
“I feel like it’s patients that are already on the transplant list, patients waiting for other operations, we have just been swept aside.
“Its not any fault of the NHS, no-one can help what is going on.
“They are trying to make it safe for us but we are still terrified of going into hospital.
“It’s my life – it is a matter of life and death,” Ana-Rose says.
‘Balance of risk’
Vanessa Hebditch, director of policy at the British Liver Trust, says this is a very worrying time for everyone.
“The outbreak means that unfortunately many intensive-care unit beds across the United Kingdom are now being used to care for those affected by this pandemic.
“The British Liver Trust understands that at the moment liver transplant centres will remain open, and urgent transplants are still taking place.
“However, transplant recipients are considered to be an extremely high-risk group should they develop coronavirus.
“Whilst, we are concerned that some people who need a transplant may have this delayed because of this unprecedented crisis, the balance of risk needs to be assessed and vulnerable patients need to be protected from contracting the virus.”
Each year 450 patients die before their transplant can be carried out.
The sad reality is that many more will die if transplants cease altogether – another hidden cost of the coronavirus emergency.
Another 21 residents are displaying Covid-19 symptoms at the Hawthorn Green home in Stepney – which houses 48 people.
A dozen staff members are also off work, either self-isolating or shielding, the care home said.
The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) said it was “working around the clock to give the social care sector the support it needed”.
A care home spokesman said: “Regrettably, seven residents have died who had symptoms consistent with Covid-19.
“Twenty-one residents are showing at least one symptom consistent with the virus.”
Jamshad Ali, an 87-year-old retired tailor who moved to London from Bangladesh in 1962, is one of those who died.
Mr Ali, who had worked for Burberry, died in the Royal London Hospital on 24 March after contracting Covid-19, a week after being discharged from hospital for a chest infection.
His daughter Luthfa Hood told the Local Democracy Reporting Service : “If we had known the virus was so prevalent in Hawthorn Green we would not have sent him back there after he had been in hospital.
“We knew that if he got it, that would be him done.
“We cannot praise the NHS enough for what they did. But there needs to be more testing, especially in places like care homes where the most vulnerable live.”
“Care home staff said they were forced to wash or reuse disposable aprons and face masks. Some care homes had run out of gloves and face masks entirely”, she said,
“I was shocked to hear that one care home had been forced to borrow protective eye equipment from a local secondary school.
“This situation is completely unacceptable and puts the health of care home staff and residents at serious risk.”
A DHSC spokesman said: “We are providing personal protective equipment to over 26,000 care home providers across the country.”
Very sadly there are similar situations in Luton and Belfast.
Hundreds of thousands of workers who may need help will be able to call or text a free number staffed by more than 1,500 trained volunteers.
The volunteers, from organisations such as Hospice UK, the Samaritans and Shout, will listen to NHS staff and give psychological support to those in need, as well as offering advice.
Staff may also be signposted to further support, such as financial assistance or specialist bereavement and psychological services, if necessary.
The hotline comes after health leaders warned that the strain on the mental and physical health of NHS staff during the Covid-19 crisis was already unprecedented, even though the epidemic has not yet reached its expected peak.
Dr Alison Pittard, dean of the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine, told The Independent some patients and staff would suffer “forms of PTSD” due to the intense workload brought on by the pandemic.
She warned intensive care units were facing a huge surge in demand and staff were “already struggling physically and mentally”.
The NHS phone line will be open between 7am and 11pm every day, with a text service which will run 24/7.
The phone number is 0300 131 7000, or staff can text “FRONTLINE” to 85258.
“We need to do everything we can to support our incredible NHS workers as they care for people through this global health emergency,” Prerana Issar, chief people officer for the NHS, said.
“That’s why we have developed a range of support for all NHS staff, from one to one mental health support to a sympathetic voice to confide in.”
She added: “The NHS is rightly doing everything we can for our staff, but the best thing the public can do for nurses, doctors and other NHS staff, is to protect them by staying indoors and washing your hands.”
The NHS has also partnered with Headspace, UnMind and Big Health to offer free apps to staff, providing services for guided meditation, practical help with anxiety and help with sleep problems.
Danny Mortimer, chief executive of NHS Employers, said staff were already providing “tremendous support” to patients and colleagues across the health service.
“It’s extremely heartening to see this kind of support will be available to NHS teams, via phone, text and online,” Mr Mortimer said.
“As the pandemic continues, our people will face new and growing challenges on a daily basis, and it’s therefore more important than ever that they are able to access resources to help them manage their wellbeing, in a way that suits their needs.”
In February, an NHS survey found two in five staff members had felt sick from work-related stress at some point in the last year — the highest level in five years.
A majority of respondents (51 per cent) had also thought about leaving their current job in the health service.
Some claimants will see a temporary increase in their benefits payments because the DWP have suspended the recovery of benefits overpayments for three months from last week.
Deductions for the recovery of Universal Credit and legacy benefit overpayments, Social Fund loans and Tax Credit debts are being paused.
The DWP say that the majority of deductions will be suspended automatically. But if you currently make repayments through a standing order or similar arrangement, you should cancel this.
Recovery of overpayments by private sector debt collection agencies where people are no longer on benefits has also been suspended.
However, the DWP is continuing to recover advance payments of universal credit by deduction.
As a result of the coronavirus outbreak, the Scottish government is to postpone changes to benefits which had the potential to make life easier for disabled claimants.
Due to staff sickness and the huge upsurge in claims for universal credit, the timetable for introducing Child Disability Payment and the Scottish replacement for Personal Independence Payment, as well a new method of decision making which is aimed at ending face to face assessments, have all been put on hold.
Child Disability Payment had been scheduled for introduction in early 2021
Disability Assistance for Working Age People, the replacement for PIP was due to be introduced at the same time.
No new date has yet been set for their introduction, but a statement should be made in late summer 2020 giving an update.
Selena Gomez has spoken out about her mental health, saying that she recently discovered that she has bipolar disorder.
The singer spoke about her diagnosis while talking to fellow ex-Disney star Miley Cyrus on Instagram Live as part of Cyrus’ ‘Bright Minded: Live’ series.
During the conversation she said that the thing that has helped her most with her mental health is learning more about her condition, as the more she knows the less scared she feels.
“Recently, I went to one of the best mental hospitals… McLean Hospital and I discussed that, after years of going through a lot of different things, I realised that I was bipolar and so, when I go to know more information, it actually helps me,” Gomez said. “It doesn’t scare me once I know it and I think people get scared of that.”
She went on to say that in her native Texas it is “not known to talk about your mental health” because young people want to be seen as being “cool”, but that having conversations is what will help the most.
“When I finally said what I was gonna say, I wanted to know everything about it and it took the fear away,” Gomez explained.
“When I was younger, I was scared of thunderstorms and my mom bought me all these different books on thunderstorms, so she’s like, ‘The more that you educate yourself on this, the more that you’re not gonna be afraid’, and it completely worked and that’s kind of something that helps me big time.”
Gomez, who has previously spoken out about experiencing depression, said that she is no longer afraid of talking and learning about her mental health, saying: “When I have more information, it actually helps me, it doesn’t scare me once I know it.”
Bipolar disorder is a mental health condition that affects your moods, often causing swings between depression and feeling very high and energetic. More information can be found on the NHS website.
I received an NHS text telling me to stay home and to have no contact with other people for the next 12 weeks. For the past four years I have been treated with immune therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. I also receive personal independence payments because I have to wear a rigid back brace due to 11 vertebral compression fractures. I live on my own in a rural location.
I have had delivery passes for Sainsbury’s home delivery for the last six years but their website will not let me book a delivery as their system states that I am not a vulnerable customer. According to its website, my 85-year-old mother who lives on her own and has dementia is also not a vulnerable customer. When I ring the helpline it is either engaged or there is a message and then I get cut off.
I really need help getting food delivered in the next 12 weeks and don’t seem to be able to even talk to any member of staff at Sainsbury’s. Please can someone help to get them to acknowledge my status?
AK, Penzance, Cornwall
As a vulnerable woman aged 78 with multiple disabilities I have been trying for a week now to inform Sainsbury’s of my situation in order to get my regular online shopping given priority. The website is useless and the telephone help centre is permanently engaged.
My disabilities include type 2 diabetes, osteoarthritis and asthma. I have no help whatsoever and have been online grocery shopping for some time now.
On 17 March I started trying to inform them of my situation. At that stage each day I hung on for periods ranging from 30 minutes to an hour and three-quarters. Finally on the Saturday I spoke to a man who assured me a form to fill in would be online on the Monday. No such thing has appeared and telephone lines are now permanently engaged.
With the latest government advice to stay at home and unable to contact Sainsbury’s, I am at my wits’ end. Please can you help?
MR, Chelmsford, Essex
The coronavirus outbreak and government advice on self-isolation and the need to stay at home has inevitably led to all supermarket delivery services (which typically account for only 7% of supermarket sales but which have since soared to 20%) struggling to meet demand.
We know retailers are buckling under the strain but what has not helped has been little clarity about the definition of who is deemed to be vulnerable. The problem is that while you, AK, appear to be among the 1.5 million most vulnerable identified by the government, you still struggled to get your delivery. Amazingly, MR does not seem to qualify. In addition to correspondence via this column from other readers unable to get their deliveries, the Guardian’s switchboard has been swamped with calls on the same problem.
We contacted Sainsbury’s, which agreed to escalate both your cases. You have subsequently managed to book slots – and another for AK’s mother – with, we understand, all three deliveries successfully made.
The retailer apologised to you both for the inconvenience caused by the long wait times and said: “We are doing our absolute best to offer online delivery slots to elderly and vulnerable customers. Elderly and vulnerable customers have priority over all slots. We have proactively contacted 270,000 customers who had already given us information that meant we could identify them as elderly or vulnerable. Our customer careline is working at full capacity to help other vulnerable customers and we are able to give an additional 8,000 customers a day access to delivery slots over the phone. We have already booked in slots for 115,000 elderly and vulnerable customers this week and this number is growing every day.
“We will (shortly) receive the government database which tells us which people the government considers to be most vulnerable. Where these people are registered with us, we will start to write to them next week to offer them a delivery slot.”
It later added: “MR and AK have both been added to our vulnerable customer list and received priority delivery slots.”
Sainsbury’s is also prioritising elderly and vulnerable customers with its click-and-collect service, which is also busy.
In response, AK told us: “Thank you so much for all your help, which has given me the best possible result and has made my birthday a much happier day today.” MR said: “Delivery arrived with very knowledgable driver. Sainsbury’s should be asking them for their opinions as they get to know their customers very well.”
The disability advocate has a life-limiting condition which includes multiple organ failure and restrictive lung disease requiring 24-hour care.
As the British Medical Association (BMA) releases guidance preparing doctors to make “brutal” decisions and prioritise treatment for those most likely to recover, Lucy fears that if she contracts Covid-19 she will not be saved.
“My life is devalued on the basis of my disabilities and needs, rather than my life and the difference I have made to the world,” she says.
This is an edited version of a blog Lucy wrote over several days, trying to make sense of her personal situation
I know full well in this Covid-19 pandemic that my life is not one that will be saved.
This is part-writing therapy, part-rant. It’s full of anger and hurt and fear. It’s trying to make peace, it’s wanting to fight back.
And it’s true, every last word.
I will be isolating for a minimum of 12 weeks, possibly longer. I have 24-hour care needs, and am usually cared for by intensive care nurses for 16 hours per day, but my nurses could be recalled to the NHS at any time. My mum can manage the nursing role, but she can’t do my care 24/7.
We are practising strict infection control. I have made the difficult step to say that if I get Covid-19, I will not be going to hospital.
I will be considered too frail, too unlikely to survive and too difficult to be weaned off ventilation on the other side – I have respiratory muscle weakness and therefore I’m unlikely to return to a meaningful quality of life – and that’s only IF I survived.
This situation is about who has the greatest chance of survival.
I have had to accept this over the last few days. It doesn’t sit comfortably with me. I rage and cry that my life is devalued on the basis of my disabilities and needs, rather than my life and the difference I have made to the world.
I’m the 9th most influential disabled person in Britain, I have an MBE for services to young people with disabilities and in 2019 I became a fellow of the Royal Society of Arts for my commitment to disability rights.
I have more than proved my worthiness of being alive, but it counts for nothing in this pandemic.
I’ve changed hearts and minds through work, passion, determination, skills and experience.
But my life will not be deemed worth saving where cut-throat (metaphorically) decisions have to be made due to limited resources and the large numbers infected with Covid – we’re struggling now, and we’re not yet near the peak.
Whilst the decision not to go to hospital is mine, the decision about treatment is not within my control.
I have to accept my life is not a priority and will not be saved.
But as much as it makes me livid and distraught, I am a level-headed person who knows this is about saving those who have the highest chance of survival.
My body is on its last legs.
I have so much going on – a nameless syndrome that stops cells making enough energy for my organs and muscles to work. I have multiple organ failure, restrictive lung disease and respiratory muscle weakness, a bowel that is always in and out of obstruction, chronic pancreatitis that keeps flaring up, an immune system that doesn’t fight infection well and a new issue causing joint pain and fever 80% of the time.
And yet I have managed to survive sepsis 14 times – is that not a great track record?
Doesn’t that show, despite how weak and fragile my body is, I’ve got a 100% success rate in surviving life-threatening events?
But do I have a high enough chance of surviving this virus – potentially at the expense of someone else’s life?
It’s a funny head space to be in, feeling like I want to live at all costs, but knowing efforts to prolong my life could cost someone else’s.
I’ve gone through the stages of grief – denial, anger, bargaining, depression – but the “end” of this cycle for me does not end in “acceptance”. I do not accept this. I do not accept that my life is less worthy to be saved.
Does it end in understanding? Yes, to an extent, I understand.
I cannot accept I’m not worth saving, but I understand why it has to be this way.
I understand it’s not personally levied against me. It’s a pandemic in which we have so few resources.
I just want to live. I have so much to do, so many plans, so many ideas.
My life matters, my life is worthy, my life is valuable. But we’re in a crisis of innumerable proportions, and people on the frontline have to make heart-breaking decisions. Decisions that aren’t fair in any way, but still have to be made.
I say thank you to the NHS, for all everyone is doing. I may make it out the other side of this pandemic; I may not. One thing I can say, however, is that the NHS has kept me alive against the odds for years. It gave me the ability to live an amazing life and to achieve great things and make a difference in the world.
My life matters now and it matters after this. I’ve created a legacy to be proud of.
Although Lucy is only presuming she will not be treated in hospital and thankfully does not have Covid-19, the BMA’s ethical guidance does prepare doctors that they will face “agonising choices” over who gets potentially life-saving treatments, including ventilation.
It says: “It is legal and ethical to prioritise treatment among patients,” and urges doctors to consider: “Severity of acute illness; presence and severity of co-morbidity; frailty or, where clinically relevant, age.”
The BMA says managers and senior doctors will set “thresholds” for admission to intensive care units – patients whose “probability” of dying, or requiring prolonged intensive support, exceeds the set threshold would not be considered for intensive treatment.
Julian Sheather, an ethical advisor for the BMA, said: “In our present circumstances, the question will no longer be how best to meet individual need, but how to maximise benefits.
“It is preferable to save the lives of three patients with high need and a high likelihood of benefiting than one patient with high need and a low – but nonetheless real – chance of benefiting.
A couple with learning disabilities who recently got engaged say they are struggling to be apart as they live in isolation with their parents.
Emma Drakeley and Paul Thomas say it has been a challenge as they rely on each other for support.
Their conditions mean they find it difficult to be inactive and communicate with each other remotely.
They say more should be done to help those with learning disabilities understand coronavirus and how to cope.
Ms Drakeley, 23, of Bushbury, Wolverhampton, is currently studying photography at college, while Mr Thomas, 28, of Wombourne, works as a gardener.
He said: “I’m used to being outdoors and always having something to do, but it’s hard to motivate myself now.
“I feel like I don’t have anything to get up for and not seeing Emma has added to that.”
Paul has dyslexia and dysphasia which means he finds spelling difficult along with concentrating for long periods. He says he is finding the lack of activity caused by isolation very testing.
Ms Drakeley has cerebral palsy and neurofibromatosis type one (NF1) – a genetic condition that affects the nervous system. It means balance and co-ordination can be difficult for her.
To help, the couple usually attend drama, dance and swimming classes, all of which have stopped since the lockdown.
“I help him with his reading and writing and he helps me keep positive and go to classes,” Ms Drakeley said.
“But now, I’m tired more because I’m just doing my college work.
“But I understand that we have to stay home to save lives.”
The couple, who have been together for about seven years, have managed to use messaging apps to keep in touch but say it may not be easy for others.
Mr Thomas said: “It’s hard only being able to text or call, it’s not the same and though we can use Facetime, other people can’t.”
The pair also think information about the virus should be clearer.
“I understand about staying in and keeping clean, but some people might not,” Emma said.
The charity Mencap has published an easy-read guide to help people with learning disabilities understand the virus.
Richard Lawrence, of Mencap, recognises being in lockdown “can be especially difficult” for those with learning disabilities.
They are “less likely to live with their partners and so often they can’t even see the person that they love the most”, he said.
“It can also be hard to understand what is happening because information isn’t always accessible” which can make it “even scarier and confusing”, he said.
Mencap advises anyone who is struggling to use technology to ask for help.
For Ms Drakeley and Mr Thomas, focusing on the future is helping.
“I just want to get back to normal – whatever that will be after this,” Ms Drakeley said.
The coronavirus pandemic has caused daily difficulties for everyone. But what if you are visually impaired? Blind journalist Kate Pounds explores the particular challenges the virus has thrown up.
As the train approached London Waterloo on my last journey home from work before lockdown, a fellow passenger remarked he didn’t want to press the button to open the doors because of Coronavirus.
It got me thinking. As someone who cannot see, I have to touch objects and surfaces much more than your average person.
Just at the station I have to feel around the ticket machine to find the card reader, touch the escalator’s moving handrail to see if it’s going to take me up or down, and touch the side of the train doorway to gauge the width of the gap I’m so often reminded to “mind”.
Added to these obvious hygiene problems, it’s also harder to find a bathroom or alcohol gel point when you want to wash your hands.
So how are other visually impaired people adapting?
Sajid Ali, a 40-year-old market researcher from West Yorkshire, says a trip to the supermarket is difficult – holding a week’s shop in one hand and a white cane in the other makes navigating a challenge.
He says he can lose balance and that it’s hard to walk in a straight line.
He says he usually asks for help to find the items he needs, but getting that vital assistance has proved challenging recently.
“They said they were not sure they could help because of ‘current things going on,'” he says. “I guess it was a contact thing, because of having to take someone’s arm for guiding. I waited around for over five minutes, and in the end they did help.”
Just getting to the shops is a challenge for Reanna Parkinson, 22, from Lancashire.
“There are a lot of main roads around here and hardly any crossings so I can’t get to other shops safely on my own,” she says.
Her dad gave her a lift last time but she feels this threatens the safety of her mum, who is classed as high risk and needs to shield for 12 weeks.
Reanna, a graduate in criminology and sociology, values her independence but says she now may have to move in with her parents to survive.
“Normally I get a delivery, but all the slots have been taken,” she says. “Some online services say they have prioritised people with disabilities for delivery slots. I’ve seen a lot of tweets from blind people asking how they get these priority deliveries but I haven’t seen any responses.”
But even if you manage to get a slot, shopping online is no picnic. For blind and visually impaired people, the process involves many more steps and is far slower, which matters when everyone is rushing to buy.
Sajid says by the time he had listened to the electronic voice of his screen reader, which tells him what’s available, other shoppers had already bought the items he needed.
“I’m worried everything will be out of stock by the time I’ve even looked,” he says.
Another issue with online shopping occurs when items are sold out and substituted, which can be a far bigger problem for some people with multiple impairments.
Hampshire mum-of-three, Mandy O’Malley, 42, has allergies, diabetes and children with particular dietary needs, so if the delivery people arrive with items she has not researched, she has to turn them away.
“In our delivery yesterday we had seven items unavailable and 14 substitutions,” she says.
Despite needing them, she had to decline the items because she couldn’t read the packaging, and social distancing meant the driver couldn’t help.
She isn’t alone here. In 2017, the RNIB reported that the employment rate among visually impaired people was around 25%, compared to 81% for the UK generally, putting them among the poorest in society.
The charity also reported higher rates of isolation and subsequent depression among sight-impaired people in normal times.
Sajid, who usually enjoys taking part in his local Parkrun at the weekend, is concerned that a lack of contact with people will get worse during the current crisis.
“I think there will be some lonely days ahead. Usually I work and go out, but I still spend a lot of time alone, I am used to it, but with all the
Despite these difficulties, many of the sight-impaired people I spoke to reported they were managing well. Some feel the complications of coronavirus are the same for them as for sighted people.
And Sajid thinks visually impaired people’s strategies and resilience may sometimes put them at an advantage in tough times.
“There’s always a lot to concentrate on for visually impaired people, it’s ten times harder,” he says. “You’ve got to keep your sense of humour.
“We face this kind of stuff every day so we probably have more of that humour in the locker.”
Almost 400 care companies which provide home support across the UK have told the BBC they still do not have enough personal protective equipment (PPE).
Without protection, providers say they may not be able to care for people awaiting hospital discharge.
Of 481 providers, 381 – 80% – said they did not have enough PPE to be able to support older and vulnerable people.
The government said it was working “around the clock” to give the sector the equipment it needs.
The BBC sent questions to the nearly 3,000 members of the UK Homecare Association.
About a quarter of respondents said they have either run out of masks or have less than a week’s supply left.
Others said they were struggling to get the gloves and aprons they needed for staff who go from one client’s home to the next to support them with washing, dressing and eating.
Just under a third of the home care providers the BBC heard from were looking after people with Covid-19 symptoms.
Suzanne Catterall, a senior care worker at Westmorland Homecare in Cumbria, speaking after visiting the first of seven clients she would see during her day, said: “I needed to use seven pairs of gloves on one call and an apron.
“This is due to cleaning, then doing personal care for the client, including applying three different creams, and preparing food.”
Dr Chris Moss, who runs Westmorland Homecare, said they have had to get supplies of PPE from local nail bars and vets’ practices.
They have had some government supplies, he said, but estimated their stock would last about a week.
“Without having it you risk transmission, you risk making more of society unwell and you put more pressure on the NHS,” he added.
And care providers warned that without the right protective equipment, they would have to make hard decisions about who they support.
Raina Summerson, chief executive of Agincare – one of the largest independent care companies, said: “If we cannot get access to PPE and follow public health guidance safely, we will be left in no position but to say we cannot accept people who are COVID 19 positive, because we will not have the equipment to deliver their care safely.”
Nearly all of the firms said they had some staff self-isolating, with a handful estimating that half their workforce was unavailable.
A further 621 UK deaths were announced on Sunday, bringing the nation’s total to 4,934.
The Department of Health and Social Care said it was providing more than 26,000 pieces of PPE to social care settings, including care homes, home care providers and hospices.
A spokesperson said: “We are working with the military and established distributors to ensure PPE is available to all staff fighting this virus on the frontline.”
As a recipient of a kidney transplant, Kate’s wife Holly falls within the high risk category, so together they are spending their third week in strict isolation.
Kate, who has mobility difficulties, admits to feeling guilty she can’t do more to help her community or to entertain their daughter Scout.
This week’s highlight is The Food Delivery which creates both euphoria and a bit of a household debate. Is anyone else disinfecting every single item before allowing them into the kitchen?
Plus Kate and Holly introduce a new podcast feature they call Isolation Issues – a game which will unite (or divide) households across Britain.
RSS Error: A feed could not be found at `https://tools.prnewswire.com/en-us/live/25821/rss`; the status code is `404` and content-type is `text/html; charset=utf-8`